Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Swiss International says five injured after flight aborts takeoff in India
    • Mali’s Defence Minister Sadio Camara killed amid coordinated attacks | Conflict News
    • 49ers GM is begging for somebody to trade for Brandon Aiyuk
    • Column: Millennial sensation Lena Dunham paid a high price for being famous, young and female
    • Small plane crash near Minneapolis kills North Dakota state legislator and pilot
    • When is London Marathon 2026? Start time and how to watch race for FREE today
    • White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner At The Washington Hilton
    • Who is Cole Allen, the suspect in the White House Correspondents’ Dinner shooting?
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»Opinions»LGBTQ+ ‘opt out’ ruling sets a dangerous precedent for U.S. schools
    Opinions

    LGBTQ+ ‘opt out’ ruling sets a dangerous precedent for U.S. schools

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsJuly 1, 2025No Comments2 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    To the editor: After studying the complete textual content of the Supreme Court docket’s determination in Mahmoud vs. Taylor, there’s little doubt in my thoughts that this precedent shall be used to restrict the flexibility of public faculties to show LGBTQ+ historical past in any respect ranges, regardless of some ambiguous and unconvincing sops to age appropriateness (“California law faces revise as high court allows parents to ‘opt out’ of LGBTQ+ school stories,” June 27).

    When dad and mom are instructed they will choose and select what historical past is taught to their kids based mostly on their faith, the door is opened to ignorance, persecution and the proverbial doom of repeating historical past’s previous errors.

    In what sounded disturbingly like a political, not judicial, determination, Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. made reference to the truth that “many People” oppose same-sex marriage, as if that was a justification for denying the truth of years of discrimination. He awkwardly threw in, as an apart, that in Maryland same-sex marriage is the legislation after which acted as if this didn’t matter the place kids’s training was involved. He couldn’t disguise his disgust on the considered a same-sex marriage being roundly celebrated even in a kids’s fairy-tale guide.

    Sadly, 4 justices who I may need thought knew higher went alongside.

    Thomas Bailey, Lengthy Seaside

    ..

    To the editor: As a Christian, I’m deeply disheartened by the Supreme Court docket’s determination to permit dad and mom to make use of spiritual beliefs as grounds for opting their kids out of books that includes LGBTQ+ characters. This ruling raises issues about different situations the place spiritual beliefs could be used to exclude books that depict interracial {couples}, ladies working, males doing family chores, racial equality, evolution, non-Christian religions, civil rights and rather more. Many Christians have traditionally held these beliefs, and it’s seemingly that many nonetheless do, which might result in widespread opt-outs of necessary literature, science and historic matters.

    Public training has been and continues to be a energy of our nation. It exposes us to information, after all, but in addition the good variety of individuals and concepts in order that we’re not divided into and by small silos of knowledge.

    Chris Soltow, Thousand Oaks



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleTrump’s latest business venture: A fragrance he says is ‘all about winning’
    Next Article Sharks sign former top 10 pick to three-year extension
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Opinions

    Column: Millennial sensation Lena Dunham paid a high price for being famous, young and female

    April 26, 2026
    Opinions

    Letters to the Editor: I used to be a landlord. Los Angeles’ policies made that unfeasible

    April 25, 2026
    Opinions

    Letters to the Editor: Governor’s debate didn’t inspire much confidence in any candidate

    April 25, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    Delegates walk out as Netanyahu speaks at the United Nations

    September 26, 2025

    1 dead, multiple injured after shooting inside Las Vegas Athletic Club: Police

    May 17, 2025

    US Senate likely to reject bid to curb Trump’s Iran war powers

    March 4, 2026
    Our Picks

    Swiss International says five injured after flight aborts takeoff in India

    April 26, 2026

    Mali’s Defence Minister Sadio Camara killed amid coordinated attacks | Conflict News

    April 26, 2026

    49ers GM is begging for somebody to trade for Brandon Aiyuk

    April 26, 2026
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.