“DISGUSTING BEHAVIOUR”
He recalled assembly the primary complainant, who accused him of raping her in 1999 after a cabaret present within the southern metropolis of Bournemouth in the course of the Labour Occasion Convention.
He stated he discovered the lady engaging and “hoped and thought there was at the very least a chance of intercourse”.
He insisted she consented to intercourse.
“Consent is prime, important, vital and certainly in some ways extra vital than intercourse itself,” he stated.
He stated he had used a condom, as a result of “that was the best way individuals had intercourse in 1999”.
He denied grabbing the breast of one other girl in a bar in 2004, saying this was “clearly disgusting behaviour”.
That girl accused him of then orally raping her in a rest room.
Model stated they did go right into a cubicle, the place “it is doable I might have taken my penis out of my trousers” however there was “no contact between her mouth and my penis”.
Model stated he remembered having anal intercourse with a 21-year-old girl who claimed he raped her in 2009, however stated this was consensual.
He denied asking her to clear up a “mess” afterwards or figuring out she was in ache, whereas saying: “it will be tough to disclaim that anal intercourse includes blood”.
He denied remembering three different ladies, certainly one of whom accused him of fondling her at work, one other who stated he put his head in her groin after demanding a therapeutic massage and one who stated he tried to tug her into a rest room at MTV’s workplaces.
The jury is anticipated to retire to think about its verdict subsequent week, the decide stated.
