Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • How This Debt Ceiling Debate Could End
    • As Congress Slashes Funding to NPR and PBS, the Real Losers May Be Far Downstream, Say Experts
    • Trump insists Iran nuclear sites destroyed amid reports some survived
    • Could Trump’s threats against Brazil backfire? | TV News
    • Saints QB competition impacted by rookie contract development
    • Trump calls those who want Epstein files released ‘troublemakers’
    • Why So Many States Want to Ban China From Owning Farmland
    • With No Clear Front-Runner, Democrats Begin Testing 2028 Presidential Waters
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»Politics»Trump’s NATO Victory – Better Trade Deals, Lifting Tariffs and Selling Weapons to Europe | The Gateway Pundit
    Politics

    Trump’s NATO Victory – Better Trade Deals, Lifting Tariffs and Selling Weapons to Europe | The Gateway Pundit

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsJune 29, 2025No Comments4 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    President Trump talking on the 2025 NATO Summit. Photograph courtesy of the White Home.

    Simply days after President Trump’s historic NATO breakthrough compelled allies to double protection spending, the financial dividends are already materializing. European Union Council President Antonio Costa confirmed Friday that NATO’s settlement to boost protection spending targets from 2% to five% of GDP “has solved the primary trade-related difficulty between Europe and the USA” and can see Europe “purchase American” weapons, immediately rebalancing commerce relations.

    Republicans have lengthy argued that Europe’s underinvestment in protection positioned an unfair burden on U.S. taxpayers and distorted the transatlantic alliance. Since World Warfare II, the USA has carried that burden, sustaining the world’s strongest navy even after ending conscription in 1973. In 2024, the U.S. spent $997 billion on protection, greater than double the $485 billion spent by all European NATO members mixed.

    The hole in functionality is even wider.

    Most European international locations slashed protection budgets after the Chilly Warfare and phased out conscription, shifting assets towards expansive welfare techniques now strained by mass migration. Solely 9 international locations in Europe nonetheless keep necessary service, and most supply civilian options that almost all of younger males select over navy responsibility. Main powers just like the UK, Germany, France, and Spain ended conscription a long time in the past. In consequence, European militaries have steadily weakened, leaving the continent depending on American energy for each deterrence and protection.

    Throughout his first time period, Trump embarrassed NATO allies by publicly calling them “freeloaders” and accusing them of being “delinquent,” claiming that “many international locations owe us an amazing amount of cash from a few years again” as a result of “the USA has needed to pay for them.”

    Whereas Trump didn’t actually current a invoice for US protection companies, he used language that advised allies owed cash for many years of American navy safety and made it clear he seen the association because the US subsidizing European protection.

    He constantly demanded that NATO members improve their protection spending past the prevailing 2% of GDP goal, publicly shaming international locations that failed to satisfy even that modest threshold and threatening penalties for individuals who continued to depend on American taxpayers to fund their safety.

    Throughout his first time period, Trump publicly known as NATO allies “freeloaders” and accused them of being “delinquent,” arguing that the U.S. had been subsidizing European protection for many years. He demanded that members meet and exceed the two% spending goal, typically shaming international locations that did not comply. His stress marketing campaign has now produced outcomes: the 5% pledge far exceeds what even conservative assume tanks just like the Heritage Basis had proposed.

    Costa confirmed {that a} portion of this spending will go towards shopping for American weapons, representing probably tons of of billions of {dollars} in future gross sales. Between 2014 and 2024, European NATO members and Canada raised protection spending from 1.43% to 2.02% of GDP. Leaping to five% marks an unprecedented shift.

    Protection Secretary Pete Hegseth has emphasised that as Europe assumes extra duty for its personal protection, the U.S. can redirect assets toward countering China within the Indo-Pacific. The NATO settlement thus helps each longstanding strategic priorities and Trump’s home agenda, together with expanded defense funding within the new funds invoice.

    The elevated European protection dedication marks probably the most important shift in burden sharing in NATO’s 75-year historical past. It additionally indicators worldwide recognition of President Trump’s management and a transparent rejection of claims that American energy is in decline. Assertions that the world might transfer on with out U.S. commerce and military protection have been confirmed false.

    NATO Secretary Common Mark Rutte mentioned Trump “deserves all of the reward” for the breakthrough, asking, “Would you ever assume that this may be the results of this summit if he wouldn’t have been re-elected president?” The European Union is now speeding to finalize new commerce agreements with Washington forward of Trump’s July deadline for reciprocal tariffs, a textbook case of “The Artwork of the Deal” in world diplomacy.

    Because the Heritage Basis famous, Europe’s adoption of Trump’s agenda displays a strengthened Atlantic alliance. His imaginative and prescient of “peace by way of power” is producing actual outcomes, for American staff, protection contractors, and U.S. strategic pursuits. In a time of nice energy rivalry, solely the USA, not Russia, not China, and never even Britain, France, or Germany, might have achieved this sort of realignment.

    If anybody nonetheless wonders: America is again.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleUkraine F-16 pilot killed in large-scale Russian attack, Zelenskyy calls for US help
    Next Article Growth is competing with Labour’s other missions
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Politics

    As Congress Slashes Funding to NPR and PBS, the Real Losers May Be Far Downstream, Say Experts

    July 19, 2025
    Politics

    With No Clear Front-Runner, Democrats Begin Testing 2028 Presidential Waters

    July 19, 2025
    Politics

    Will Gen Z Realize Its Future Runs on Fossil Fuels?

    July 19, 2025
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    Zohran Mamdani Claims Victory in NYC’s Mayoral Democratic Primary, Cuomo Concedes

    June 25, 2025

    Russian drone attacks on Kharkiv, east Ukraine kill two and injure dozens | Russia-Ukraine war News

    March 30, 2025

    Paramount to Pay $16 Million to Settle Trump’s ‘60 Minutes’ Lawsuit

    July 4, 2025
    Our Picks

    How This Debt Ceiling Debate Could End

    July 19, 2025

    As Congress Slashes Funding to NPR and PBS, the Real Losers May Be Far Downstream, Say Experts

    July 19, 2025

    Trump insists Iran nuclear sites destroyed amid reports some survived

    July 19, 2025
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.