As two former members of the California Legislature, we perceive the complexities and hard fiscal selections that include a tightly constrained price range. As mayors of two of California’s largest cities, and members of the state’s Huge Metropolis Mayors coalition, we additionally know the devastating penalties of abandoning a statewide dedication to deal with the homelessness disaster — a disaster pushed by many years of underinvestment and insufficient housing manufacturing.
Homelessness is by far probably the most urgent concern dealing with communities up and down California, and the cash the state has invested by means of the Homeless Housing, Help and Prevention Grant Program, often called HHAP, has had an infinite impression on our skill to get unhoused folks off our streets.
That’s why we’re involved that the proposed state price range doesn’t embrace one other spherical of funding for this system. HHAP grants — which for California’s greatest cities, with the largest homeless populations, run into the thousands and thousands of {dollars} — are important to fulfill the purpose of decreasing encampments and getting unsheltered Californians on a path to everlasting housing. Merely put, with out these grants the state’s homelessness downside will balloon.
Because of HHAP, our two cities have seen vital reductions in homelessness. In January, San Diego’s point-in-time rely showed a 14% drop in contrast with 2024. Sacramento, the place the newest rely was final yr, achieved a 29% drop over two years. Earlier rounds of HHAP funding allowed us to develop modern, domestically tailor-made options, leading to actual progress for 1000’s of our most susceptible residents. Since HHAP’s inception in 2019, California’s 13 largest cities have used the state funds to create 17,691 shelter beds, join greater than 152,000 folks to shelter, construct 2,295 everlasting housing models and place 42,215 Californians into momentary or everlasting housing options.
In Sacramento, HHAP assets assist greater than 1,300 models of emergency shelter and a whole lot of everlasting supportive housing models. San Diego has doubled its citywide shelter capability, expanded avenue outreach groups and created new interventions, together with its Secure Parking Program for folks dwelling of their vehicles.
We perceive that addressing homelessness is expensive, and but leaving folks on the streets is much costlier. Our law enforcement officials and firefighters discover themselves on the entrance traces of the disaster, and that drives up prices for taxpayers. Companies and faculties are left to select up the tab, too.
We acknowledge the significance of accountability. Our backgrounds as former legislators have taught us the worth of fiscal accountability, transparency and exhibiting outcomes with public {dollars}. California’s huge cities are dedicated to making sure HHAP funds are spent properly and successfully. Huge Metropolis Mayors tracks and stories how HHAP {dollars} are used, and we welcome further oversight to make sure each greenback achieves most impression.
The information show that earlier state investments are making an actual distinction. However the scale of the disaster calls for sustained funding. We’re at a important juncture. Because the Trump administration retreats from its duties on homelessness, it’s extra necessary than ever for California to steer.
The human price of inaction is immense. Each day, we see the faces of those that are struggling — veterans, households, youngsters and folks with disabilities. And daily, we see what’s potential when somebody is moved from the sidewalk into shelter after which into a house.
We urge the Legislature to fulfill this second by totally funding HHAP at $1 billion — with a state general fund of greater than $225 billion to work with, that ought to be potential.
The problem of homelessness will not be insurmountable — however we can’t afford to go backward. With assist, our cities can proceed their work making homelessness within the Golden State uncommon, temporary and non-recurring.
Todd Gloria is the mayor of San Diego and Kevin McCarty is the mayor of Sacramento. Each are former members of the California Legislature, and members of the 13-city California group Huge Metropolis Mayors.
Insights
L.A. Times Insights delivers AI-generated evaluation on Voices content material to supply all factors of view. Insights doesn’t seem on any information articles.
Viewpoint
Views
The next AI-generated content material is powered by Perplexity. The Los Angeles Instances editorial workers doesn’t create or edit the content material.
Concepts expressed within the piece
- The authors argue that California’s Homeless Housing, Help and Prevention Grant Program (HHAP) has been important in decreasing homelessness, citing examples like San Diego’s 14% drop in homelessness in 2024 and Sacramento’s 29% discount over two years[provided article].
- They emphasize that HHAP funding has enabled cities to create over 17,000 shelter beds, join 152,000 folks to shelter, and place 42,215 people into housing since 2019, highlighting localized options like San Diego’s Secure Parking Program[provided article].
- The authors warn that defunding HHAP would exacerbate homelessness, stressing that police, firefighters, and taxpayers bear larger prices when unsheltered populations stay on streets[provided article].
- They advocate for sustained $1 billion HHAP funding, arguing that California’s $225 billion common fund makes this possible and needed to take care of progress[provided article].
Completely different views on the subject
- Critics level to federal information exhibiting California’s homeless inhabitants grew by 3% in 2024, with over 187,000 folks unhoused—the very best uncooked quantity nationwide—suggesting current packages haven’t halted progress[1][4][5].
- Regardless of state efforts, 66% of California’s homeless inhabitants stays unsheltered, the very best fee within the U.S., elevating questions on shelter accessibility and long-term housing methods[2].
- Los Angeles noticed a 35% surge in homelessness in 2025, indicating regional disparities in program effectiveness and potential gaps in addressing localized crises[3].
- Whereas California’s homelessness progress fee (3%) is decrease than the nationwide common (18%), opponents argue even modest will increase sign systemic challenges, notably as 22 states confronted double-digit rises[4][5].