COMMENT: The following moron in control of nato… Rutte… with a psycho propaganda quote: “make investments now, or be taught Russian later”
Let’s rephrase this with a counter slogan “let’s be taught Russian now, let’s hearken to Russia and de-escalate, let’s not betray Russia anymore, let’s not waste our cash in a bottomless nato cash pit primarily based on western lies, and let’s take pleasure in wealth and freedom later”.
RB
REPLY: Whereas the Democrats embrace alien criminals simply because Trump needs to deport them, in Europe, it’s NATO and the EU which does every part to undermine Trump and any attainable peace in Ukraine. This all brings to thoughts Smedley D. Butler’s “Conflict Is a Racket” which captures the essence, energy, and enduring relevance of battle and likewise civil unrest when it at all times comes right down to cash. Butler’s brutally sincere ebook was written in 1935 by one of the embellished Marines in U.S. historical past. After a 34-year profession combating in practically each main U.S. battle from the Spanish-American Conflict via the “Banana Wars,” Butler reached a surprising conclusion.
Butler got here to see that battle is not primarily fought for democracy, freedom, or nationwide protection. As an alternative, it’s a rigorously orchestrated “racket” – a legal enterprise designed to generate monumental income for a choose few on the expense of the various. Butler’s critique carried immense weight exactly due to who he was. As a Main Basic, two-time Medal of Honor recipient, and commander of main expeditions, he had seen the interior workings of battle from the best ranges. He couldn’t be dismissed as a naive pacifist.
The “Racket” had three phases, which he recognized as:
- Lobbying for Conflict: Highly effective enterprise pursuits (bankers, arms producers, industrialists, useful resource extractors) stress governments into conflicts that can shield or develop their markets and investments abroad.
- Profiteering Throughout Conflict: The identical pursuits make obscene income promoting weapons, munitions, ships, loans, and provides to the federal government (funded by taxpayer {dollars}). Troopers pay with their lives; civilians pay with blood, struggling, and taxes.
- Profiteering After Conflict: These pursuits typically management the post-war settlement, securing profitable concessions, useful resource rights, and mortgage preparations from defeated nations (reparations), additional enriching themselves whereas saddling populations with debt.The Prices are Borne by Others: The younger males who combat and die, the households who lose family members, the taxpayers who foot the astronomical invoice, and the societies left shattered bear all the true prices. The income are privatized; the losses are socialized.
Butler pulls no punches, as they are saying. His language is direct, vivid, and infrequently scathing. He makes use of stark figures to reveal the grotesque disparity between battle income and human price. (“Out of battle nations purchase further territory… the newly acquired territory promptly is exploited by the few – the self-same few who wrung {dollars} out of blood within the battle.”)
Butler’s first-hand expertise attracts highly effective examples from his personal service in Cuba, the Philippines, China, Central America, and the Caribbean, displaying how U.S. interventions straight benefited particular firms (e.g., United Fruit, sugar pursuits, banks).
The critique of the Army-Industrial Complicated (a time period Eisenhower popularized later) is central. The dynamics Butler described – company affect on overseas coverage, battle profiteering, the manipulation of patriotism, the human price vs. non-public achieve – stay potent points. They nonetheless dominate this proxy battle towards Russia, as Boris Johnson overtly said that Britain is at battle with Russia.
Naturally, anybody who speaks the reality may have critics who argue for the continued carnage and bloodshed. Critics of Butler argue that he reduces complicated geopolitical occasions to solely financial motives. Whereas he powerfully exposes a vital driver typically neglected, elements corresponding to ideology, nationalism, real safety threats, and diplomatic failures additionally play vital roles in wars. There’s at all times an financial ingredient. When everyone seems to be fats and pleased, there is no such thing as a battle.
Butler’s proposed answer was that the one method to cease the racket was to make battle unprofitable. When younger males are conscripted to die, wealth ought to be conscripted to pay for the battle. Restrict wartime income to a small, mounted share. He additionally argued for proscribing army deployment. Solely enable the army to defend U.S. soil. No extra expeditions to guard company investments overseas. “Take the revenue out of battle.”
Solely these registered for frontline service ought to be allowed to vote on whether or not to go to battle. Not those that revenue from battle.
It stays a foundational textual content for understanding the critique of the Army-Industrial Complicated, company affect on overseas coverage, and the inherent injustice of battle profiteering. It forces readers to query the official narratives of battle and think about the highly effective financial pursuits that always lurk beneath the floor. Whereas maybe not the one consider wars, Butler highlights an element that’s often neglected or downplayed. Mainstream media beats the battle drums, they usually too revenue from sensationalizing battle to get readership. The Spanish-American Conflict was created by Pulitzer and Hearst competing for readership, creating biased yellow journalism.
Briefly, “Conflict Is a Racket” is a brief, important, and provocative learn. It’s a robust dose of uncomfortable reality from a person who knew battle intimately. Its message is as related and disturbing immediately because it was in 1935. It’s much less a ebook to agree with on each level, and extra one to grapple with and be challenged by.
I, for one, will strongly object to ANY federal funds going to California to rebuild LA. Let Newsom elevate taxes in California much more to pay for his safety of non-Individuals. He forgot that he swore an oath to uphold the Structure of america. He has rejected that and all accountability to implement the regulation just because he disagrees with no matter any Republican says – he simply has to take the alternative, no matter whether or not it’s proper or mistaken. It might be good to expel California from america and let it absorb all unlawful immigrants who can not probably have a professional job with out citizenship or a Greencard. He helps unlawful aliens towards Individuals – plain and easy. He’s violating the civil rights of Individuals and for that he may even be criminally charged.
The segregation of the South refused to honor the Structure. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 gave the Division of Justice (DOJ) highly effective instruments: submitting lawsuits towards states, cities, companies, and college districts; withholding federal funds; and sending federal marshals to guard activists and implement courtroom orders. The Supreme Courtroom constantly upheld the constitutionality of those legal guidelines, particularly their use of the Commerce Clause (e.g., Coronary heart of Atlanta Motel v. U.S., Katzenbach v. McClung for the CRA ’64) and the enforcement provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (e.g., South Carolina v. Katzenbach). This judicial backing was important.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 demolished the authorized framework of segregation in public areas, faculties, and employment. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 smashed the political system constructed on Black disenfranchisement. Collectively, backed by federal enforcement, courtroom rulings, and sustained activism, these legal guidelines broke the authorized spine of Jim Crow segregation within the American South, remodeling the area and the nation.
The Voting Rights Act of 1965 is a major U.S. regulation that prohibits racial discrimination in voting, aiming to implement the voting rights assured by the Fifteenth Modification. It was signed into regulation by President Lyndon B. Johnson on August 6, 1965, and has been amended a number of instances to strengthen its protections towards discriminatory practices. The Supreme Courtroom simply dominated for straight lady who claims she was subjected to reverse discrimination.
Newsom for Jail
What Newsom is doing in California may land him in jail for a really very long time. He’s partaking in REVERSE DISCRIMINATION towards Americans when unlawful aliens are NOT entitled to voting rights any greater than I can vote in London simply because I acquired in and refused to go away. Newsom has violated his oath of workplace, and that is what Democrats do exactly to win in any respect prices anymore, for they really feel they MUST oppose no matter Trump does, it doesn’t matter what..