Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Akron High School Football Game Halted After Off-Field Violence
    • UAE investigators say flydubai co-pilot was planning ‘terrorist act’
    • Remains of Bulgaria’s Czar Samuel return ‘home’ after 1,000 years | History News
    • Mississippi State drops SEC showdown to Alabama
    • Contributor: There’s federal progress on women’s health. No joke
    • Tennessee Correction commissioner to resign days after botched execution of Christa Pike: Governor
    • UCLA Coach Scouts High School Football During Bye
    • Protests over housing flare in Spain after relief measures rejected
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»World Economy»South Korea Wants Military Independence — Good, Let Them Pay For It
    World Economy

    South Korea Wants Military Independence — Good, Let Them Pay For It

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsAugust 19, 2026No Comments4 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    South Korea has responded to Trump’s determination to scale back joint army workouts by speaking about turning into extra militarily independent. President Lee Jae Myung desires South Korea to regain wartime operational management of its forces and speed up its army capabilities. The institution instantly presents this as if Trump has one way or the other endangered America by pushing an ally towards self-reliance.

    The American taxpayer ought to by no means have been anticipated to finance the protection of rich international locations indefinitely. South Korea is just not some impoverished creating nation incapable of defending itself. It is likely one of the world’s largest economies, possesses a classy industrial and technological base, and has constructed a formidable army. If Seoul believes it ought to have higher management over its personal nationwide protection, then by all means it ought to.

    Trump has complained for years that America’s allies anticipate Washington to hold a disproportionate share of their protection burden. South Korea isn’t any exception. The US maintains roughly 28,500 troops on the Korean Peninsula, and the 2 international locations have repeatedly fought over how a lot Seoul ought to contribute towards the fee. They reached one other burden-sharing settlement extending by 2030, however Trump’s elementary grievance has by no means modified: why ought to American taxpayers be anticipated to defend affluent overseas nations without end? The identical argument applies to NATO, and that is in the end why NATO will face an existential disaster.

    The Europeans have constructed their postwar governments across the assumption that America would offer the last word army assure. That allowed European politicians to spend huge sums on welfare states and home political initiatives whereas neglecting their very own army capabilities. At any time when anybody questioned the association, Washington’s foreign-policy institution insisted that America one way or the other wanted NATO greater than Europe wanted America.

    If NATO disappeared tomorrow, is Canada going to invade america? Is Belgium going to assault Washington? Is Poland going to ship troops throughout the Atlantic? The US possesses its personal nuclear deterrent, huge typical forces, two huge oceans, super pure sources, and one of many world’s largest economies. Europe requires American army energy to stability Russia way over America requires European army energy to defend North America.

    South Korea faces the identical fundamental actuality in Asia. North Korea threatens Seoul immediately. It doesn’t threaten Washington in remotely the identical geographical sense. South Korea subsequently has a far higher speedy curiosity in sustaining deterrence on the Korean Peninsula than the American taxpayer does.

    This doesn’t imply alliances are nugatory. Alliances can serve strategic functions, enhance intelligence cooperation, deter battle, and forestall adversaries from dominating necessary areas. However an alliance should profit each side. It can’t turn into a everlasting association the place one nation gives the last word army assure whereas everybody else treats that assure as an entitlement.

    South Korea refused Trump’s request to assist America’s actions in opposition to Iran. Trump then publicly complained about that refusal whereas ordering the Pentagon to scale back joint workouts with Seoul. Trump additionally argued that the workouts price “Tons of of Tens of millions of {Dollars}” and questioned why America ought to proceed conducting them when Kim Jong Un had been “unthreatening and respectful” towards america throughout his presidency.

    South Korea is completely entitled to say Iran is just not its struggle. However America is equally entitled to ask why North Korea should subsequently stay America’s monetary accountability. You can not have sovereignty solely when it’s handy.

    If Seoul desires an unbiased overseas coverage towards Iran, Ukraine, China, and each different geopolitical dispute, then that’s exactly what a sovereign nation ought to have. South Korea has been equally cautious relating to Ukraine. It has condemned Russia, supported sanctions, supplied humanitarian and financial help, but resisted turning into immediately concerned within the struggle at the same time as North Korea moved nearer to Moscow.

    President Lee desires wartime operational management transferred again to South Korea, and Seoul is discussing stronger indigenous army capabilities. That ought to not frighten Individuals. American taxpayers ought to welcome rich allies turning into able to defending themselves.

    The foreign-policy institution has constructed this weird doctrine whereby any discount in American army accountability is portrayed as American decline. They measure American energy by what number of international locations rely upon Washington. That’s not power. That’s legal responsibility.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleAlia Shawkat Addresses Brad Pitt Dating Rumors
    Next Article Trump signals economic pressure in Iran conflict as talks stall: ANALYSIS
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    World Economy

    Market Talk – October 2, 2026

    October 2, 2026
    World Economy

    The ’26 Midterms – The Demise Of Both Republicans & Democrats

    October 2, 2026
    World Economy

    Developed World Resembles Emerging Markets With Debt Spiral

    October 2, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    Israel and Iran agree ceasefire amid waves of missiles | Israel-Iran conflict News

    June 24, 2025

    Joe Rogan Expertly Schools Bono After Far-Left Singer Makes Up an Outrageous Lie Regarding Elon Musk and DOGE – Musk Responds with Fire (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit

    May 31, 2025

    New York Real Estate Brokers Say They’ve Been Flooded With Calls From People Looking to Flee the City After Mamdani Primary Win | The Gateway Pundit

    June 26, 2025
    Our Picks

    Akron High School Football Game Halted After Off-Field Violence

    October 3, 2026

    UAE investigators say flydubai co-pilot was planning ‘terrorist act’

    October 3, 2026

    Remains of Bulgaria’s Czar Samuel return ‘home’ after 1,000 years | History News

    October 3, 2026
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.