Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Career Risks That Futureproof Your Engineering Path
    • Market Talk – July 15, 2026
    • Former Federal Reserve Adviser Sentenced to 38 Months in Prison After Lying About Sharing Restricted Information With Suspected Chinese Intelligence Operatives
    • Commentary: What science loses when T rex becomes a trophy
    • Iran says peace deal voided, fighting ‘existential war’ after US attacks | US-Israel war on Iran News
    • Alvin Kamara, Saints show loyalty with restructured contract
    • LAPD officers’ offensive comments are worse than the privacy violation
    • US Mint to begin striking dollar coin featuring Trump
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»Opinions»Rosalind Franklin made James Watson’s historic discoveries possible
    Opinions

    Rosalind Franklin made James Watson’s historic discoveries possible

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsNovember 11, 2025No Comments1 Min Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Nov. 11, 2025 6:30 AM PT

    To the editor: James Watson’s 1962 Nobel Prize, awarded collectively with Francis Crick and Maurice Wilkins, is among the many best-known Nobel honors (“James Watson, Nobel Prize winner and DNA pioneer, dies,” Nov. 7). It must be famous, nevertheless, that it was British chemist Rosalind Franklin who, in May 1952, made Watson’s achievement potential by exhibiting in her well-known {Photograph} 51 that DNA was a double helix, not a triple helix favored by Caltech’s Linus Pauling. Sadly, Franklin couldn’t win a Nobel Prize as a result of she died of ovarian most cancers in 1958, at age 37, and the prize isn’t awarded posthumously.

    The outspoken and controversial Watson had described Franklin unflatteringly in his 1968 guide “The Double Helix.” Nonetheless, years later, he agreed that Franklin’s work was indispensable to figuring out the construction of DNA in remarks he made in 2000 on the opening of King’s School’s Franklin-Wilkins constructing in London.

    Harold N. Bass, Porter Ranch



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleJimmy Kimmel’s bandleader Cleto Escobedo III dies
    Next Article The ‘2024-25 NBA scoring leaders by team’ quiz
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Opinions

    LAPD officers’ offensive comments are worse than the privacy violation

    July 15, 2026
    Opinions

    Coastal Commission has done the right things. Trump should back off

    July 15, 2026
    Opinions

    State needs higher standards for teachers and stronger evaluations

    July 15, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    Five MLB players who could be traded during spring training

    February 24, 2026

    ICC rejects release for Philippines ex-president Duterte

    November 28, 2025

    Column: Thoughts and prayers? Sure, but hold the Trump administration accountable

    July 11, 2025
    Our Picks

    Career Risks That Futureproof Your Engineering Path

    July 15, 2026

    Market Talk – July 15, 2026

    July 15, 2026

    Former Federal Reserve Adviser Sentenced to 38 Months in Prison After Lying About Sharing Restricted Information With Suspected Chinese Intelligence Operatives

    July 15, 2026
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.