Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • The Complicated Reality of 3D Printed Prosthetics
    • Canada unveils new sanctions on Russian drones, energy
    • Toyota opens US battery plant, confirms $10bn investment plan | Automotive Industry News
    • Rob Gronkowski earns “full circle” moment with Patriots 
    • Letters to the Editor: Kratom and 7-OH products need safe regulation, not prohibition
    • ‘Tragic event’: Indiana sheriff’s deputy fatally struck while assisting stranded motorist
    • Danish man given suspended sentence for sharing nude film scenes on Reddit
    • Epstein alleged Trump ‘knew about the girls’: Democrats
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»Opinions»Rosalind Franklin made James Watson’s historic discoveries possible
    Opinions

    Rosalind Franklin made James Watson’s historic discoveries possible

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsNovember 11, 2025No Comments1 Min Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Nov. 11, 2025 6:30 AM PT

    To the editor: James Watson’s 1962 Nobel Prize, awarded collectively with Francis Crick and Maurice Wilkins, is among the many best-known Nobel honors (“James Watson, Nobel Prize winner and DNA pioneer, dies,” Nov. 7). It must be famous, nevertheless, that it was British chemist Rosalind Franklin who, in May 1952, made Watson’s achievement potential by exhibiting in her well-known {Photograph} 51 that DNA was a double helix, not a triple helix favored by Caltech’s Linus Pauling. Sadly, Franklin couldn’t win a Nobel Prize as a result of she died of ovarian most cancers in 1958, at age 37, and the prize isn’t awarded posthumously.

    The outspoken and controversial Watson had described Franklin unflatteringly in his 1968 guide “The Double Helix.” Nonetheless, years later, he agreed that Franklin’s work was indispensable to figuring out the construction of DNA in remarks he made in 2000 on the opening of King’s School’s Franklin-Wilkins constructing in London.

    Harold N. Bass, Porter Ranch



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleJimmy Kimmel’s bandleader Cleto Escobedo III dies
    Next Article The ‘2024-25 NBA scoring leaders by team’ quiz
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Opinions

    Letters to the Editor: Kratom and 7-OH products need safe regulation, not prohibition

    November 12, 2025
    Opinions

    Klamath farmers are looking for ‘stability’ in law implementation

    November 12, 2025
    Opinions

    Capitalism should work, but the U.S.’ version of it is ‘out of whack’

    November 12, 2025
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    Letters to the Editor: GOP megabill isn’t so beautiful when it comes to our warming planet

    June 2, 2025

    The Two Reputations of Robert E. Lee

    September 4, 2025

    Palestinians flee as Israel strikes Gaza City with ‘unprecedented force’ | Israel-Palestine conflict News

    September 19, 2025
    Our Picks

    The Complicated Reality of 3D Printed Prosthetics

    November 12, 2025

    Canada unveils new sanctions on Russian drones, energy

    November 12, 2025

    Toyota opens US battery plant, confirms $10bn investment plan | Automotive Industry News

    November 12, 2025
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.