Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Charles Proteus Steinmetz: Electric Vehicle Visionary
    • US Iran War – Here We Go Again
    • Iranians in Istanbul jittery but jubilant at US, Israeli strikes
    • Lamine Yamal hits hat-trick as Barcelona beat Villarreal 4-1 in La Liga | Football News
    • Why NFL team asked Fernando Mendoza to get arrested
    • Letters to the Editor: Paramount’s dominant bid for Warner Bros. could have startling consequences
    • Trump starkly warns of potential US casualties in ‘massive ongoing operation’ to stop Iranian regime
    • Security stepped up at Singapore’s checkpoints following US, Israeli strikes on Iran
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»Opinions»Rosalind Franklin made James Watson’s historic discoveries possible
    Opinions

    Rosalind Franklin made James Watson’s historic discoveries possible

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsNovember 11, 2025No Comments1 Min Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Nov. 11, 2025 6:30 AM PT

    To the editor: James Watson’s 1962 Nobel Prize, awarded collectively with Francis Crick and Maurice Wilkins, is among the many best-known Nobel honors (“James Watson, Nobel Prize winner and DNA pioneer, dies,” Nov. 7). It must be famous, nevertheless, that it was British chemist Rosalind Franklin who, in May 1952, made Watson’s achievement potential by exhibiting in her well-known {Photograph} 51 that DNA was a double helix, not a triple helix favored by Caltech’s Linus Pauling. Sadly, Franklin couldn’t win a Nobel Prize as a result of she died of ovarian most cancers in 1958, at age 37, and the prize isn’t awarded posthumously.

    The outspoken and controversial Watson had described Franklin unflatteringly in his 1968 guide “The Double Helix.” Nonetheless, years later, he agreed that Franklin’s work was indispensable to figuring out the construction of DNA in remarks he made in 2000 on the opening of King’s School’s Franklin-Wilkins constructing in London.

    Harold N. Bass, Porter Ranch



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleJimmy Kimmel’s bandleader Cleto Escobedo III dies
    Next Article The ‘2024-25 NBA scoring leaders by team’ quiz
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Opinions

    Letters to the Editor: Paramount’s dominant bid for Warner Bros. could have startling consequences

    February 28, 2026
    Opinions

    Column: There are two Americas. Falling mortgage rates matter only to the wealthy one

    February 28, 2026
    Opinions

    Contributor: The U.S. hockey team took gold. Its bigger feat? Transcending politics

    February 27, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    Contributor: The shroud of silence over Gaza

    September 25, 2025

    US mulls letting Nvidia sell H200 chips to China, sources say

    November 22, 2025

    Tax breaks for homeowners don’t only benefit the super rich

    September 16, 2025
    Our Picks

    Charles Proteus Steinmetz: Electric Vehicle Visionary

    February 28, 2026

    US Iran War – Here We Go Again

    February 28, 2026

    Iranians in Istanbul jittery but jubilant at US, Israeli strikes

    February 28, 2026
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.