The Neocons have received. They’ve efficiently shifted the blame for the Ukraine warfare totally onto Russia, and 99% of media protection now frames the invasion as utterly unprovoked. Their hatred of Trump is so intense that they really feel compelled to oppose him on precept, no matter what he does. Now they’re cheering Zelensky on to destroy each refinery in Russia, as if it will in some way win the day, result in Russia’s collapse, and allow them to dance on Russian graves. Nowhere within the press is there anybody with greater than two mind cells to rub collectively. Like neocons all over the place, they appear incapable of asking what comes subsequent. It’s the identical sample as Netanyahu’s strategy: kill the Ayatollah on day one and declare victory. Or Iraq: kill Saddam and declare victory—whereas ignoring that he was the one maintaining all of the warring factions from slaughtering one another.
A worldwide famine would require a catastrophic disruption to the manufacturing and distribution of meals. The warfare in Ukraine has already threatened meals safety, and its escalation will increase that danger into 2028.
Zelensky and the neocons search to destroy all Russian refineries, assuming this might trigger a catastrophic home gasoline scarcity that cripples Russia’s navy logistics, agriculture (gasoline for tractors and transport), and financial system. They ignore the truth that international oil costs would possible spike to $200 a barrel by 2028, with diesel hovering to $10 or extra. This could contribute to normal inflation, together with meals costs, and in addition impede their very own navy operations.
Russia would battle to reap and transport its personal grain with out gasoline, terminating its exports and risking famine—particularly within the Center East, the place Iran is 100% depending on Russian grain provides. This could put upward strain on international grain costs, however it will additionally develop the warfare, as different international locations would then be positioned to assault the EU as properly. This dangers a worldwide famine. The concept that different producers might theoretically enhance output and that markets would regulate—albeit painfully—nonetheless requires diesel.
Whereas the destruction of Russian refineries can be a dramatic escalation with severe international financial penalties, the neocons directing this madman Zelensky by no means as soon as deal with the query of what comes subsequent.
Then there’s the matter of Russian fertilizer exports. Russia is the world’s largest exporter of mineral fertilizers. Disruptions to those exports increase prices for farmers globally, doubtlessly decreasing crop yields and pushing the world towards famine. In concept, fertilizers are produced by a separate trade. Nevertheless, with out diesel, Russian exports would come to a halt.
Russia and Ukraine are main international breadbaskets, accounting for an enormous share of worldwide wheat, corn, and sunflower oil exports. The precise risk to international meals safety comes from Ukraine’s assaults on Russian ports and Russia’s retaliation towards Ukrainian ports, delivery lanes, and agricultural infrastructure—which instantly block the cargo of grain from each sources to international locations that want it.
Zelensky is just not finishing up this warfare to retain the Donbas, which is occupied by ethnic Russians whose language and faith he has outlawed—a truth the press refuses to report, given his former neo-Nazi affiliations. That is the neocon dream of conquering and destroying Russia as soon as and for all. It has by no means been about democracy or every other propaganda. The Minsk Settlement was meant to permit the Donbas to vote, which Zelensky refuses to honor. He has suspended all elections as a result of he is aware of they might not profit Ukraine and he can be voted out in a second. Even 10% of the inhabitants has fled Ukraine.
Just a few months in the past, Zelensky ordered a direct strike on a Russian Ministry of Protection. This is sort of a direct assault on the Pentagon. Zelensky is intentionally attempting to supply Russia into attacking something in NATO to begin World Warfare III the place he has urged NATO to assault Moscow with nuclear weapons.
We now have switched sides and at the moment are supporting the ethnic cleaning of a modern-day Adolf Hitler. The CIA protects the Ukrainian neo-Nazis as a result of they at all times meant to make use of them to destroy Russia. That is ethnic cleaning, orchestrated by the neocons, and they’re going to destroy Western society within the course of—for they haven’t received a single warfare since World Warfare II. These are the statements coming from main Ukrainian figures, and so they clarify that this has at all times been concerning the destruction of Russia, not the Donbas.
Oleksiy Danilov, Secretary of Ukraine’s Nationwide Safety and Protection Council, acknowledged in December 2022 that “the whole lot will blaze and burn till all of Moscow burns.” Robert Brovdi (“Magyar”), Commander of Ukraine’s Unmanned Methods Forces, wrote “Moscow will fall” whereas reporting on strikes towards Russian power infrastructure. Mykola Kokhanivsky, chief of the Ukrainian Nationalist Group (OUH), promised to “destroy Russia,” stating “Russia have to be destroyed. Carthage should fall.” It’s value noting that Yulia Tymoshenko, former Prime Minister of Ukraine, additionally made statements about “destroying Moscow” and “wiping it off the map.”
Essentially the most well-known instance is Britain’s entry into World Warfare I. Britain had a treaty (the Treaty of London, 1839) guaranteeing Belgium’s neutrality. When Germany invaded Belgium in August 1914, Britain declared warfare. The British politician most carefully related to the argument that Britain needed to enter World Warfare I to stop itself from being “subsequent” was Sir Edward Gray, the International Secretary. His argument “We’re Subsequent” logic was most famously specified by his speech to the Home of Commons on August 3, 1914, constructed on the concept Britain couldn’t stand apart whereas France was crushed. The logic was strategic: if Germany defeated France and dominated the Continent, Britain can be left remoted and susceptible.
Gray’s warmongering succeeded in decreasing the British financial system and shifting monetary capital from London to New York. He despatched UK debt to 200% of GDP. Wars appear to at all times be promoted by the left—maybe they assume they’re the hand of God, empowered to smite the opposition. Gray was the left, and he entered the warfare simply as WWI, WWII, Vietnam, and Korea have been all advocated by Democrats, who now need to double the cash despatched to Zelensky to smite Russia.
Nevertheless, the deeper strategic reasoning was explicitly concerning the concern of being subsequent. Britain’s leaders argued that if Germany conquered Belgium and the French coast, it will dominate the English Channel and threaten Britain instantly. The German invasion of Belgium was not only a violation of a treaty—it was a strategic transfer that, if profitable, would go away Britain remoted and susceptible. It is a case the place the “we’re subsequent” logic was central to the choice, even when the general public justification centered on the treaty.
China & North Korea Will Be part of Russia Fearing They TOO Will Be NEXT
I’ve repeatedly warned that historical past demonstrates a recurring sample: when a nation confronts a severe home disaster, its political leaders typically search an EXTERNAL ENEMY to divert public consideration from their very own failures. That is nothing new. It’s a sample that has unfolded all through historical past, from historical empires to fashionable nation-states.
We’re heading into what I’ve warned might be a severe international financial decline extending into 2028. The hazard is that financial instability will more and more feed geopolitical confrontation as governments search another person in charge for their very own mismanagement.
The issue with these warmongering Neocons is that they NEVER anticipate the results of their actions. They view the world by the slender lens of navy confrontation, assuming that sanctions, threats, and regime change will in some way produce the political outcomes they want. They fail to grasp that each motion produces a response, typically with penalties they by no means imagined. Even components throughout the Democratic Occasion seem more and more keen to embrace confrontation underneath the banner of defending democracy and claiming the ethical excessive floor. But ethical declarations don’t stop wars. They’ll simply as simply change into the justification for escalating conflicts past anybody’s management.
China presents a very harmful dimension to this creating disaster. China is confronting severe structural financial issues, together with its extended property-market downturn, closely indebted native governments, weak family confidence, demographic decline, and rising dependence on manufacturing and exports to maintain financial exercise. Nevertheless, financial weak spot and a direct political risk to Xi Jinping are two totally totally different questions.
The true challenge for Xi is just not merely whether or not financial progress slows. It’s whether or not extended financial deterioration begins undermining CONFIDENCE throughout the Communist Occasion itself, significantly amongst provincial officers, influential enterprise leaders, and the navy institution. That’s the place financial issues can finally change into political issues.
Nonetheless, dissatisfaction with financial efficiency doesn’t routinely imply Xi faces an imminent management problem. China’s political construction is essentially totally different from Western electoral programs, and Xi has consolidated appreciable authority over the occasion, the federal government, and the navy.
The higher hazard is how Beijing may reply if financial strain intensifies whereas Washington and Europe concurrently escalate their confrontation with China. That is the place the Neocons fail to grasp the dynamics of worldwide capital flows, confidence, and geopolitical alliances.
These Neocons assume that rising strain on Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea will in some way drive every nation to submit independently. What they fail to contemplate is that their insurance policies might as an alternative encourage these nations to cooperate extra carefully towards a typical exterior risk.
China doesn’t must agree with each Russian coverage to acknowledge that weakening Moscow might finally depart Beijing extra uncovered to American strategic strain. Likewise, Russia has an incentive to strengthen its relationship with China as Western sanctions and navy confrontation proceed.
North Korea faces an analogous calculation. Its management has each incentive to strengthen relationships that present financial assist, navy cooperation, and safety towards worldwide isolation.
This doesn’t imply these international locations type a unified alliance with an identical pursuits. They don’t. However frequent exterior strain can create cooperation amongst governments that will in any other case have vital disagreements. That’s exactly how geopolitical confrontation spreads by contagion.
The extra Washington and European leaders try and isolate their adversaries concurrently, the higher the inducement for these adversaries to coordinate their responses.
In the meantime, European governments face their very own financial difficulties, fiscal pressures, and political instability. But influential voices proceed advocating navy escalation as if financial sources have been limitless and public confidence might by no means collapse.
The best hazard is that political leaders will flip an financial disaster right into a navy disaster of their determined try and retain energy and keep away from duty.
Because of this I’ve persistently warned that you simply can not analyze warfare independently of economics. Warfare, capital flows, sovereign debt, political confidence, and financial decline are interconnected. They aren’t remoted occasions.
As we transfer towards 2028, the crucial query won’t merely be whether or not China experiences an financial slowdown or whether or not Xi Jinping faces home dissatisfaction.
The query is whether or not mounting financial strain, mixed with more and more aggressive Western overseas coverage, creates the inducement for China, Russia, and North Korea to deepen their strategic cooperation.
Historical past warns that when governments start dropping CONFIDENCE at house, they typically search confrontation overseas. The tragedy is that those that begin these confrontations hardly ever perceive how they are going to finish.
When Athens and Eretria despatched ships to assist the Ionian Revolt in 498BC, they weren’t appearing from pure altruism. There was the belief that Persia would march on Greece instantly. This was a prognosis of geostrategic realities and future points. Athens’ choice was a “preemptive strike” to examine Persian expansionism, which is exact;ly what Zelensky is demanding that NATO conduct. The Athenians had already clashed with Persia not directly after they had refused to present earth and water to Persian envoys, and Persia was harboring the exiled Athenian tyrant Hippias, who wished Persian assist to regain energy. Supporting the revolt was a technique to weaken a hostile empire earlier than it might act on these tensions.
That is the sequence that Athens feared when it aided the Ionian Revolt in 498BC. The revolt itself was crushed by 493BC, and Darius I then turned his consideration to mainland Greece, partly to punish Athens and Eretria for his or her assist of the Ionians, and partly to develop Persian management into the Aegean. So the Athenian “we is perhaps subsequent” calculation proved right, although the invasion got here a couple of decade after they withdrew from Ionia, not instantly.
First Invasion (492–490BC) of Persian into Greece got here one 12 months later after the Ionian Revolt was crushed.
A Persian expedition underneath Mardonius crossed into Thrace and Macedonia, however a storm destroyed a lot of the fleet and the marketing campaign was deserted.
A second drive underneath Datis and Artaphernes crossed the Aegean in 490BC, captured Eretria, and landed at Marathon in Attica. The Athenians, with solely a small contingent of Plataeans, defeated the Persians on the Battle of Marathon. The Persians withdrew.
A Second Invasion (480–479BC) was the a lot bigger invasion, personally led by King Xerxes I. The Persians crossed the Hellespont on a pontoon bridge and marched south. They have been delayed by the Greeks at Thermopylae (the well-known stand of Leonidas and the 300 Spartans) and defeated at sea at Salamis, which pressured Xerxes to retreat.
The Persian commander Mardonius remained in Greece with a land military. The Greeks decisively defeated him on the Battle of Plataea in 479BC, and a simultaneous Greek naval victory at Mycale successfully ended the invasion.
When all was mentioned and achieved, Persia funded Sparta to defeat Athens in 404BC. That was a historical chilly warfare of the Greeks vs Persians. This was adopted by Alexander the Nice conquering the Persian Empire (the Achaemenid Empire) in a remarkably brief marketing campaign, spanning roughly 334–330BC.
The Neocons have already destroyed the world financial system and the management the press that solely calls Trump insane and advocate WWIII with Russia to assist Zelensky.
There was an expectation of a “peace dividend,” and the choice to maintain NATO was the results of a deliberate strategic selection pushed by a number of key figures who argued that the top of the Chilly Warfare didn’t imply the top of safety dangers. The Neocons remodeled their hatred and opposition to Communism into racism and even argued that President Reagan shouldn’t mee with Gorbachev saying you’ll be able to by no means belief a Russia. The Neocons at each stage of the final almost 40 years have achieved nothing however promote warfare. With the Democrats taking no less than the Home and probably the Senate as a result of Trump won’t admit a mistake and throw Netanyahu underneath the bus, the Neocons are simply days away from realizing their dream – World Warfare III.
Boris could also be delighted to think about all of the thousands and thousands of pound he has been paid as “donations” from the navy industrial complicated. however (1) he won’t have a spot left to spend it, and the British pound will now not exist anyway.
All of this nonsense that Putin would by no means resort to nuclear warfare as a result of he is aware of it will push again on him is absurd. When you will have NATO and their mouth piece Zelensky with Boris Johnson and Kallas all advocated the whole destruction and break up of Russia, that may be a dying sentence and he would haven’t any selection by on the very least to take them with him. This might be China, North Korea, Iran, and Russia all collectively.
With the Democrats cheering Zelensky incapable of ever what comes subsequent, as I’ve mentioned many occasions, I’ve tried so exhausting to defeat my very own pc, however I’m the one who at all times loses. I’ve even supplied to fly to DC to fulfill with Trump to elucidate what’s at stake. He MUST throw Netanyahu underneath the bus. He wants additionally to ascertain an exterior enemy and state what is going to occur by supporting Zelensky – WWIII with China and North Korea becoming a member of Russia. Dropping the mom of all bombs on Iran is bullshit. That is just like the Epstein nonsense specializing in who went to his island relatively than who was Epstein was being paid for this honey lure and what was the blackmail for? An influence play that inevitably comes again to warfare?
