Palantir co-founder Peter Thiel lately met with New York Instances columnist Ross Douthat to debate many subjects, together with innovation, life extension know-how, the antichrist, and transhumanism.
The subject of transhumanism was introduced up when Douthat requested Thiel, “Ought to the human race survive?”
Thiel responded, “Sure. However I additionally would love us to radically clear up these issues. And so it’s at all times, I don’t know, yeah — transhumanism.”
The co-founder of Palantir added, “The perfect was this radical transformation the place your human, pure physique will get remodeled into an immortal physique.”
He later acknowledged that transgenderism doesn’t go far sufficient with regards to altering one’s physique and shared, “We wish greater than cross-dressing or altering your intercourse organs. We wish you to have the ability to change your coronary heart and alter your thoughts and alter your entire physique.”
WATCH:
I utterly agree with Thiel. In fact we wish to enhance ourselves. In fact we wish to obtain mastery over our flesh. In fact we wish to advance to date that someday we’d not be recognizable as human. pic.twitter.com/wvcLUihlIs
— Hunter Ash (@ArtemisConsort) June 29, 2025
In case you’re unfamiliar with transhumanism, it’s an ideology that promotes utilizing know-how and science to reinforce human capabilities.
Primarily, transhumanists welcome an period the place people merge with machines.
Later within the interview, Thiel and Douthat focus on the antichrist.
Thiel shared that “The way in which the Antichrist would take over the world is you discuss Armageddon nonstop. You discuss existential threat nonstop, and that is what it’s worthwhile to regulate.”
The New York Times offered a transcript:
Douthat: You might have been giving talks lately concerning the idea of the Antichrist, which is a Christian idea, an apocalyptic idea. What does that imply to you? What’s the Antichrist?
Thiel: All proper. Properly, I may discuss it for a very long time. I feel there’s at all times a query of how we articulate a few of these existential dangers, a number of the challenges we’ve got, they usually’re all framed on this form of runaway dystopian science textual content. There’s a threat of nuclear battle, there’s a threat of environmental catastrophe. Possibly one thing particular, like local weather change, though there are many different ones we’ve provide you with. There’s a threat of bioweapons. You might have all of the completely different sci-fi situations. Clearly, there are particular varieties of dangers with A.I.
Thiel: However I at all times suppose that if we’re going to have this body of speaking about existential dangers, maybe we also needs to discuss concerning the threat of one other sort of a foul singularity, which I’d describe because the one-world totalitarian state. As a result of I’d say the default political resolution individuals have for all these existential dangers is one-world governance. What do you do about nuclear weapons? We now have a United Nations with actual enamel that controls them, they usually’re managed by a world political order. After which one thing like that is additionally: What will we do about A.I.? And we want international compute governance. We’d like a one-world authorities to regulate all of the computer systems, log each single keystroke, to verify individuals don’t program a harmful A.I. And I’ve been questioning whether or not that’s going from the frying pan into the hearth.
Thiel: The atheist philosophical framing is “One World or None.” That was a brief movie that was put out by the Federation of American Scientists within the late ’40s. It begins with the nuclear bomb blowing up the world, and clearly, you want a one-world authorities to cease it — one world or none. And the Christian framing, which in some methods is similar query, is: Antichrist or Armageddon? You might have the one-world state of the Antichrist, or we’re sleepwalking towards Armageddon. “One world or none,” “Antichrist or Armageddon,” on one stage, are the identical query.
Thiel: It’s a really implausible plot gap. However I feel we’ve got a solution to this plot gap. The way in which the Antichrist would take over the world is you discuss Armageddon nonstop. You discuss existential threat nonstop, and that is what it’s worthwhile to regulate. It’s the alternative of the image of Baconian science from the seventeenth, 18th century, the place the Antichrist is like some evil tech genius, evil scientist who invents this machine to take over the world. Individuals are means too scared for that.
Thiel: In our world, the factor that has political resonance is the alternative. The factor that has political resonance is: We have to cease science, we have to simply say “cease” to this. And that is the place, within the seventeenth century, I can think about a Dr. Strangelove, Edward Teller-type individual taking up the world. In our world, it’s much more more likely to be Greta Thunberg.
WATCH:
Peter Thiel is requested why he’s not the Antichrist he warns about if he’s actively constructing authoritarian rule through navy and surveillance applied sciences
“These are completely different situations…clearly I don’t suppose that that’s what I’m doing” pic.twitter.com/cDEdAW1Eqs
— HOT SPOT (@HotSpotHotSpot) June 27, 2025
You may watch the whole interview under:
