Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Market Talk – July 1, 2025
    • Rwanda, DR Congo Sign US-Brokered Peace Agreement in Washington
    • Powell reiterates US Fed will wait for more data before cutting rates
    • Will Thailand’s Prime Minister survive the latest crisis? | TV Shows
    • Mitch Marner is the perfect Golden Knights addition in every way
    • Letters to the Editor: Will the USS Ronald Reagan get the same treatment as USNS Harvey Milk?
    • USAID programs now being run by State Department as agency ends operations
    • Cuba’s Energy Crisis: A Systemic Breakdown
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»Opinions»Opinion: Is this the way to win a Nobel Peace Prize?
    Opinions

    Opinion: Is this the way to win a Nobel Peace Prize?

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsFebruary 23, 2025No Comments6 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    For somebody with “a hyper-fixation” about profitable the Nobel Peace Prize, as an advisor put it, Donald Trump certain goes about all of it improper in his second spin as president and purported peacemaker.

    Simply as Neville Chamberlain didn’t get the award after appeasing Adolf Hitler by ceding the Sudetenland — “peace for our time,” the British prime minister declared, only a yr earlier than Germany subsequent rolled into Poland to spark World Warfare II — Trump received’t win a Nobel ought to he dealer “peace” in Ukraine on the terms he’s these days gifted to its invader, Russia’s Vladimir Putin. And simply as in 1939, Poland may very well be the emboldened aggressor’s subsequent goal, and never the final.

    Nor would Trump be feted at some future Oslo award ceremony if he realizes his imaginative and prescient of peace within the Center East: the ethnic cleaning of 1.8 million Palestinians from Gaza, to who-knows-where, so People can create a second “Riviera” — with the assistance of U.S. troops if the area doesn’t capitulate.

    Opinion Columnist

    Jackie Calmes

    Jackie Calmes brings a important eye to the nationwide political scene. She has a long time of expertise overlaying the White Home and Congress.

    “The U.S. will take over the Gaza Strip, and we’ll do a job with it too,” Trump proclaimed at a White Home news conference Feb. 4. “We’ll be sure that it’s executed world-class.” Simply not for the Gazans who name it dwelling.

    The president spoke as he stood beside a grinning Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the person liable for turning Gaza into what Trump calls a “demolition site” primed for growth. Minutes earlier than Trump proposed “permanently” displacing Gazans — a violation of international law — he had fielded a query about whether or not he may nab the coveted Nobel for a separate Israeli-Hamas hostage deal (which former President Biden initiated).

    “I deserve it,” he replied. “However they’ll by no means give it to me.”

    Trump’s reply displays his tiresome grievance that, as with the 2020 election, he solely loses as a result of a sport is rigged towards him. The proximate offender apparently is a committee elected by Norway’s parliament, which culls hundreds of nominations from around the globe. However it appears merely a stand-in for dastardly globalists generally, in Trump’s view.

    His pining for the prize is long-standing. Trump groused all through his first time period about his supposed snub, telling the Future Farmers of America in 2018, “They in all probability won’t ever give it to me.” On the southern border in 2019, he boasted that Japan’s chief believed Trump ought to get the peace prize for his outreach to nuclear-armed North Korea; finally, Trump got here away with dictator Kim Jong Un’s “love letters,” and Kim with extra nukes than earlier than. (According to Japan’s nationwide newspaper, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe nominated Trump on the Trump administration’s request. “I’m not saying it’s not true,” Abe responded.)

    And repeatedly throughout his 2024 marketing campaign, Trump whined at rallies that he was extra deserving than “Barack Hussein Obama,” who received the peace prize early in his presidency. Even Obama acknowledged his award was untimely. To know the Nobel committee’s pondering requires a recall of how broken America’s world model had change into below President George W. Bush — after the Iraq invasion (based mostly on a lie about weapons of mass destruction), CIA “black websites,” alleged torture, the horrific photos from Abu Ghraib and go-it-alone diplomacy general.

    The 2009 Nobel announcement acknowledged Obama, if principally prospectively, for “his extraordinary efforts to strengthen worldwide diplomacy,” his advocacy of nuclear nonproliferation, worldwide establishments, democracy and human rights, and his push for “a extra constructive function” for the USA on local weather change.

    None of that applies to Trump.

    Sycophants echo his I-wuz-robbed aggrievement. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who not too long ago met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in Kyiv, on Tuesday told Fox Information that Trump may win the peace prize for his efforts to finish the Russia-Ukraine struggle — “if it had been pretty awarded.” On Friday, at a conservative gathering, nationwide safety advisor Mike Waltz predicted Trump would obtain the prize as a result of his is “the presidency of peace.”

    Give us a break. It’s hardly going out on a limb to recommend that the Nobel panel wouldn’t see Trump’s machinations — in Ukraine, the Center East or simply typically in undoing the 80-year-old worldwide order that America constructed after two world wars — in step with the beliefs of prize creator Alfred Nobel, a nineteenth century chemist and entrepreneur.

    On the identical day that Bessent mused about Trump the Nobel laureate, Trump blamed Ukraine for its personal invasion by Russia precisely three years in the past. Ukraine — Zelensky particularly — “ought to have by no means began it,” Trump informed reporters, parroting Putin. For days he condemned the democratically elected Zelensky — not Putin — because the “dictator” on this bloody drama.

    Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev gleefully posted: “Should you’d informed me simply three months in the past that these had been the phrases of the US President, I might have laughed out loud.” Simply what the world wants: Tyrants in Russia yukking it up together with these in China, North Korea and Iran, at democratic nations’ expense.

    Final week, Trump’s negotiators met with Putin’s in Saudi Arabia, leaving Ukraine and European allies steaming on the sidelines, their fates on the desk in Riyadh. Stepping into, the self-described artist of the deal gave Putin all he sought: renewed contact with the U.S., Ukrainian land Russia has seized and U.S. opposition to Ukraine becoming a member of NATO. In the meantime, administration officers conveyed to Ukraine Trump’s demand for a half-share of its mineral wealth in return for previous U.S. help.

    Vice President JD Vance is busily aping the boss, denigrating Zelensky and scolding longtime European allies (in Munich, web site of Chamberlain’s disgrace) for not embracing the continent’s far-right events. However Trump’s former vp was among the many few Republicans objecting. Mike Pence posted on Wednesday: “Mr. President, Ukraine didn’t ‘begin’ this struggle. Russia launched an unprovoked and brutal invasion claiming lots of of hundreds of lives. The Highway to Peace have to be constructed on the Reality.”

    Reality: It’s additionally the highway to the peace prize. For Trump, that’s the highway not taken.

    @jackiekcalmes



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleTrump administration fires workers at NIH’s Alzheimer’s research center, including incoming director
    Next Article Powerful MLB owner pushes salary floor, igniting CBA talks
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Opinions

    Letters to the Editor: Will the USS Ronald Reagan get the same treatment as USNS Harvey Milk?

    July 1, 2025
    Opinions

    LGBTQ+ ‘opt out’ ruling sets a dangerous precedent for U.S. schools

    July 1, 2025
    Opinions

    Supreme Court’s decision on injunctions gives Trump too much power

    July 1, 2025
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    Venice protests target Bezos over mounting grievances

    June 28, 2025

    UK and EU reset talks go ‘down to the wire’

    May 18, 2025

    US stocks and dollar tumble as Trump fails to soothe economic fears

    April 10, 2025
    Our Picks

    Market Talk – July 1, 2025

    July 1, 2025

    Rwanda, DR Congo Sign US-Brokered Peace Agreement in Washington

    July 1, 2025

    Powell reiterates US Fed will wait for more data before cutting rates

    July 1, 2025
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.