Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Market Talk – June 30, 2026
    • Pakistan tutoring centre roof collapses, killing 14 children
    • Five humanitarian workers killed in convoy ambush in South Sudan | Conflict News
    • ‘Framework’ for 49ers completing Maxx Crosby trade revealed
    • Contributor: Birthright citizenship should never have been in question
    • Supreme Court rolls back federal limits on campaign finance
    • Giving It A Shot | Armstrong Economics
    • Iran prepares for late supreme leader’s funeral
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»Opinions»Oil company decision to bypass Coastal Commission is ‘arrogant’
    Opinions

    Oil company decision to bypass Coastal Commission is ‘arrogant’

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsApril 9, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    To the editor: Few communities know the devastation that oil drilling can produce as a lot as Santa Barbara (“Under Trump, Texas firm pushes to restart Santa Barbara oil drilling. Is it skirting California laws?” April 6). We’ve got seen our seashores drenched in oil, our land despoiled and wildlife killed. Sable Offshore Corp. is stuffed with guarantees that its operations might be secure and safe. But its conceited actions to disregard cease-and-desist orders from the California Coastal Fee warn us that it can’t be trusted.

    America produces extra oil and gasoline than every other nation on Earth. Do we have to danger despoiling a pristine coastal space to get extra? Regardless of the Trump administration’s “drill-baby-drill” insurance policies, accountable world leaders are phasing out fossil fuels and transitioning to cheaper, safer renewable power.

    The town of Santa Barbara’s 2024 Local weather Motion Plan, “Collectively to Zero,” offers a street map aimed toward attaining carbon neutrality by 2035. There’s no place in that plan for extra oil and gasoline.

    Robert Taylor, Santa Barbara

    ..

    To the editor: I used to be a younger mom in Santa Barbara on the time of the 1969 spill, a lawyer for Santa Barbara County on the time of the Exxon Alaska spill, when the county needed to think about “tankering” of oil from offshore platforms, and I used to be a public member of the Coastal Fee in 2015, when the Refugio spill — the one from the identical pipeline at challenge now — poured from onshore, into the ocean, damaging 100 miles of shoreline.

    That is precisely why we now have a robust, statewide Coastal Act. Sable’s declare that it doesn’t want permits for repairs in environmentally delicate habitat is specious, and it has preemptively sued the fee. Now that Sable has acquired Exxon’s processing plant, in addition to the pipeline — 10 years after the Refugio spill — for the sake of all our kids, and grandchildren, all of the permits ought to be revoked or deemed deserted.

    Jana Zimmer, Santa Barbara

    ..

    To the editor: The 1969 Santa Barbara catastrophe, the “environmental shot heard around the world,” helped result in the founding of America’s strongest coastal regulatory company, the California Coastal Fee. The company was singular for a lot of causes. Foremost, it was birthed by the folks in 1972’s Proposition 20 and codified 4 years later with passage of the California Coastal Act. Oil drilling off our storied coast was thereby regulated. Texas-based Sable is working to unravel the fee’s regulatory authority. We should struggle this effort. Contact Sacramento officers. Remind them that our treasured coast is the soul of California.

    Tom Osborne, Laguna Seaside

    …

    To the editor: In the identical April 6 version of The Occasions there’s an article a few Texas oil firm attempting to renew drilling off the coast of Santa Barbara after which a number of pages later one other article about an oil firm that has been discovered answerable for damaging coastal Louisiana (“Chevron ordered to pay more than $740 million to restore Louisiana coast in landmark trial,” April 6). What’s that definition of madness once more?

    Larry Harmell, Granada Hills



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous Article‘Death sentence’: Advocates blast $1.3 billion in State Department food aid cuts
    Next Article Pirates are dealing with yet another unforced PR blunder
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Opinions

    Contributor: Birthright citizenship should never have been in question

    June 30, 2026
    Opinions

    The Big Bear eaglets flying would be a better display than fireworks

    June 30, 2026
    Opinions

    The Democratic Party is changing. Both parties need the wake-up call

    June 30, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    Nigeria ‘welcomes US assistance’ to fight ‘terrorism’ after Trump’s threats | News

    November 2, 2025

    Column: On Iran, Russia and China, Trump’s weakness for strongmen explains his foreign policy

    March 5, 2026

    Jack Hughes scores in overtime as US beats Canada for gold at the Olympics

    February 22, 2026
    Our Picks

    Market Talk – June 30, 2026

    June 30, 2026

    Pakistan tutoring centre roof collapses, killing 14 children

    June 30, 2026

    Five humanitarian workers killed in convoy ambush in South Sudan | Conflict News

    June 30, 2026
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.