Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • American Consumer Confidence Cracks As The War Cycle Intensifies
    • CNA Explains: Why Trump wants the Abraham Accords tied to an Iran deal
    • Starbucks’ Korean sales fall after backlash to ‘Tank Day’ ad campaign | Protests
    • Winners, losers from NBA playoffs: Knicks sweep Cavaliers
    • Ebola outbreak in DRC, Uganda ‘will get worse before it gets better’: WHO chief
    • Commentary: I survived Ebola. This is what scares me most about this outbreak
    • Cost of living crisis reshapes Eid spending in Nigeria | Business and Economy News
    • Astros pitchers combine to make history in win over Rangers
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»Opinions»Letters to the Editor: Rather than swapping animals, consider cutting back on meat altogether
    Opinions

    Letters to the Editor: Rather than swapping animals, consider cutting back on meat altogether

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsFebruary 24, 2026No Comments1 Min Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Feb. 24, 2026 8 AM PT

    To the editor: As a vegan, my coronary heart hurts when meat-swapping is touted as a method to scale back one’s local weather influence (“What if just 1 in 10 people changed how they eat, drive, heat or shop?,” Feb. 18).

    Little doubt, elevating chickens requires much less land and water than beef. However People already eat greater than 9 billion chickens annually, a very mind-boggling quantity. And free-range or not, chickens are not protected below federal animal welfare legal guidelines. The speed at which chickens have to be slaughtered to maintain up with demand is a nightmare for them, to not point out slaughterhouse employees, who typically can’t even take bathroom breaks.

    How about another resolution? Decreasing one’s meat consumption throughout the board helps animals and the planet. Only one or two non-animal meals every week makes a distinction. With easy tweaks, we can assist the planet and scale back the struggling of cattle.

    Kristen Kessler, Ventura



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleSavannah Guthrie announces $1M reward for recovery of mom Nancy Guthrie
    Next Article After two wild seasons, how do we judge the L.A. Galaxy in 2026?
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Opinions

    Before banning screens in early education, consider a focused approach

    May 24, 2026
    Opinions

    Column: Trump’s ‘anti-weaponization’ fund is just reparations for violent insurrectionists

    May 24, 2026
    Opinions

    California’s journalism fund wasn’t meant only for its biggest players

    May 23, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    Vivian Balakrishnan to meet Gulf leaders on working visit to Middle East

    May 1, 2026

    Trump heads to Texas after catastrophic flooding, avoiding criticism he’s heaped on other governors

    July 11, 2025

    UN imposes ‘snapback’ sanctions on Iran over its nuclear program

    September 28, 2025
    Our Picks

    American Consumer Confidence Cracks As The War Cycle Intensifies

    May 26, 2026

    CNA Explains: Why Trump wants the Abraham Accords tied to an Iran deal

    May 26, 2026

    Starbucks’ Korean sales fall after backlash to ‘Tank Day’ ad campaign | Protests

    May 26, 2026
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.