To the editor: Thanks for a balanced, unemotional column in regards to the dealing with of the query of how “human” AI is (“In two new court cases, judges find that AI does not have human intelligence,” March 6). Maybe I agree with the rulings as a result of that’s how I view AI and need it to be considered; i.e., it’s a instrument or a complement to our skills, together with these involving creativity.
Perhaps a brand new class of copyright legislation could possibly be created involving works created by AI. Because the expertise needs to be shaped/created/backed by people, no less than at the moment nonetheless, maybe such guardrails could possibly be fairly applied. On the level when AI is extra self-sufficient, nonetheless, then the topic would have to be addressed once more in that context.
Courageous new world we’re residing in, eh?
As for the attorney-client privilege declare, as a paralegal in quite a lot of corporations over a 30-year interval, I just about see the courtroom’s determination as a slam dunk.
John Snyder, Newbury Park
