Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • This Researcher Trains Robots to Make Educated Guesses
    • Market Talk – June 12, 2026
    • Hezbollah says it confronted Israeli troops advancing in south Lebanon
    • Will there be a deal to end the Iran war this time? | Donald Trump
    • Eagles may have a familiar trade target after missing on Myles Garrett
    • Contributor: David Hockney’s paintings gave the world a vision of L.A.
    • 1 killed, 10 hurt in mass shooting in Midland, Texas; suspect also dead: DPS
    • Contemporary art giant David Hockney dies aged 88
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»US News»Judge temporarily freezes payments from Trump administration’s ‘Anti-Weaponization Fund’
    US News

    Judge temporarily freezes payments from Trump administration’s ‘Anti-Weaponization Fund’

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsMay 31, 2026No Comments3 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    A federal choose in Virginia on Friday ordered a short lived freeze on any funds coming from the Trump administration’s “Anti-Weaponization Fund” as she considers arguments in a lawsuit introduced by a former Jan. 6 prosecutor to dam the fund completely. 

    The order from U.S. District Decide Leonie Brinkema particularly bars the administration “from taking any additional motion pursuant to the creation or operation of the Anti-Weaponization Fund,” together with transfers of cash or consideration of claims from people who could argue they’re victims of political persecution. 

    The $1.776 billion fund, announced last week, was established by the Justice Division to compensate those that allege they have been wrongly focused beneath the Biden administration.

    It was created in change for President Donald Trump agreeing to drop his $10 billion lawsuit towards the IRS in addition to two civil claims for $230 million associated to the Russia collusion investigation he confronted throughout his first time period in workplace and the 2022 search of his Mar-a-Lago property — sparking accusations of self-dealing and a bipartisan uproar over the potential use of taxpayer cash to pay rioters who attacked the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

    Performing Lawyer Common Todd Blanche, pressed about the fund earlier this month, mentioned, “Anyone on this nation is eligible to use in the event that they consider they are a sufferer of weaponization.”

    Friday’s order didn’t weigh in on the authorized deserves of the case introduced by former Jan. 6 prosecutor Andrew Floyd and different plaintiffs suing beneath the premise that the fund is unlawfully discriminatory beneath claims that it might solely presumably profit political allies of President Trump. 

    Decide Brinkema ordered an expedited briefing schedule within the lawsuit and a listening to set for Friday, June 12, to contemplate whether or not to grant a long run freeze barring the administration from shifting ahead with the fund. 

    President Donald Trump listens throughout a Cupboard assembly within the Cupboard Room of the White Home, Could 27, 2026 in Washington.

    Kent Nishimura/AFP by way of Getty Photos

    Hours after Decide Brinkema issued her order, the federal choose who beforehand oversaw Trump’s lawsuit towards the IRS ordered attorneys for Trump and the DOJ to handle whether or not the settlement that created the “Anti-Weaponization Fund” amounted to an effort to deliberately deceive her. 

    The order from U.S. District Decide Kathleen Williams adopted a submitting by a bipartisan group of former federal judges requesting that she reopen the case to probe whether or not the creation of the settlement — in addition to an addendum that precluded the IRS from investigating Trump and his household’s tax returns — amounted to illegal collusion. 

    Decide Williams ordered the attorneys to file a response earlier than June 12 addressing their positions on expenses of collusion, whether or not the case’s dismissal was “premised on deception,” and whether or not the case ought to be reopened on the premise that the Court docket was “the sufferer of a fraud.” 

    A spokesperson for the Justice Division didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark from ABC Information.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleThe Real Reason Russia Would Invade Europe
    Next Article NASCAR Cracker Barrel 400 preview: Favorite, underdog, top storylines
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    US News

    1 killed, 10 hurt in mass shooting in Midland, Texas; suspect also dead: DPS

    June 12, 2026
    US News

    Judge rejects legal effort to cancel White House’s UFC event

    June 12, 2026
    US News

    Children are being recruited as criminals at an ‘industrial scale’: Europol

    June 12, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    Letters to the Editor: Anyone with political aspirations should be fighting to stop Trump

    April 10, 2026

    World’s biggest EV battery maker sees shares jump on debut

    May 20, 2025

    Contributor: Why is the GOP resisting Chinese investment in the U.S.?

    May 21, 2025
    Our Picks

    This Researcher Trains Robots to Make Educated Guesses

    June 12, 2026

    Market Talk – June 12, 2026

    June 12, 2026

    Hezbollah says it confronted Israeli troops advancing in south Lebanon

    June 12, 2026
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.