The unconventional left-wing takeover of our judiciary has reached a terrifying new low.
In a stunning and totally unhinged ruling issued on Wednesday, the Hawaii Supreme Courtroom has launched a direct, disgraceful assault on the US Supreme Courtroom.
Within the case of Granillo v. State of Hawaii, authored by activist Affiliate Justice Todd Eddins, the rogue state court docket went fully off the rails.
In Might 1989, Daniel R. Granillo was accused of abducting Laura Worth (a pseudonym) from a Maui buying heart parking zone after her boyfriend deserted her. Worth testified that Granillo grabbed her, held a knife to her neck, drove her to the Kahului breakwater, and sexually assaulted her, forcing oral intercourse and digital penetration. She escaped by leaping from the transferring automobile, flagged down assist, and was discovered hysterical, soiled, with messy hair and later bruises on her face, thigh, and arm.
Granillo was convicted in July 1990 on kidnapping, two counts of first-degree sexual assault, and tried first-degree sexual assault. He acquired 40 years. The prosecution’s case rested closely on Worth’s testimony, however they bolstered it with “uncontroverted bodily proof” from FBI hair and fiber professional Wayne Oakes.
Oakes testified {that a} hair present in Granillo’s automobile was “in line with” coming from Worth and had been forcibly eliminated. Fibers from Worth’s underwear and pants have been “in line with” Granillo’s automobile seat cowl and flooring carpet. The prosecution hammered this in closing: bodily proof proved Worth was within the automobile along with her pants on, then off, whereas Granillo assaulted her. The jury convicted.
For many years, this was customary, accepted forensic science. Courts throughout America, together with Hawaii’s personal precedent in State v. Fukusaku (1997), handled microscopic hair and fiber comparability as dependable.
In 2017, the DOJ notified Hawaii prosecutors that the FBI had reviewed outdated circumstances and located Oakes’ testimony overstated the science. The 2009 Nationwide Analysis Council report and 2016 PCAST report had concluded that microscopic hair and fiber evaluation can solely present class-level associations — not particular person identification. No extra “in line with originating from” a selected individual to the exclusion of others.
Granillo filed a post-conviction petition. The Hawaii Supreme Courtroom didn’t simply apply regular requirements. It created/expanded a broad “false proof” rule below the state structure’s due course of clause, held that prosecutorial data of the falsity isn’t required, discovered a “affordable risk” the testimony contributed to conviction, and ordered a brand new trial.
The left-wing majority used their official state opinion to color the conservative majority of the U.S. Supreme Courtroom as literal enemies of constitutional rights and presumptive racists.
This can be a full breakdown of the rule of legislation.
In the blistering 91-page opinion, Justice Eddins and his woke cohorts declared that Hawaii interprets its structure “independently, untethered from the Supreme Courtroom’s evaluation of the US Structure.” They selected to deal with the landmark rulings of the best court docket within the land as nothing greater than “white noise.”
Beneath are among the opinions and politically charged assaults on the US Supreme Courtroom:
Web page 74
“The Supreme Courtroom’s imperious ideology doesn’t cease at due course of. The identical jurisprudence has cratered democracy itself.
Begin with the Voting Rights Act.
The Roberts Courtroom did what Congress by no means would. It rewrote the Voting Rights Act of 1965, a cornerstone of American civil rights, democratically enacted and repeatedly reauthorized. Shelby County v. Holder, started the judicial demolition, inventing a textually unsupported equal-sovereignty fiction and putting down preclearance on a hunch that the legislation labored too properly. Brnovich v. Democratic Nationwide Committee,fabricated ‘guideposts’ nowhere in Part 2 to greenlight racial discrimination in voting. Louisiana v. Callais, buried what remained of the crown jewel of the civil rights motion. Fake legislation for an actual statute.
The Courtroom then ditched its personal thirty-two day default for releasing selections and hustled out its judgment mid-primary, a favor granted over objection solely twice in twenty-five years.”
Web page 75
“The Roberts Courtroom sees solely white. It refuses to acknowledge who the Equal Safety Clause was written to guard. The freed individuals, their descendants, and all others denied equal citizenship. U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 1.
It turns its again on what’s in plain sight. The Fourteenth Modification isn’t colorblind. It by no means was.
The Courtroom calls the Structure colorblind whereas engineering the dilution of Black votes, the unraveling of hard-fought civil rights treatments, and the erasure of Black historical past.”
Web page 76
“That isn’t blindness. That’s white sight, by design.
A Structure interpreted this fashion isn’t colorblind. It’s regardless of the Courtroom wants it to be. A solution to advance its partisan venture.”
Web page 77
“Final month, Nat’l Republican Senatorial Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm’n, 609 U.S. ___ (June 30, 2026), made Residents United look quaint, shredding coordinated spending limits Congress had enacted, and guaranteeing that those that bankroll elections drown out the bizarre individual. Billionaires spend to be repaid. Everybody else simply votes. The Roberts Courtroom has made certain one’s wealth counts greater than one other’s vote.
Rulings run in a single path, time after time. Weakening protections for these with much less energy. Fortifying these with extra. The sample speaks for itself. A court docket that systematically dismantles democratic safeguards, steamrolls constitutional liberties, and tramples human dignity doesn’t chart the course for the Hawaiʻi Structure.
…
A Supreme Courtroom pushed by agenda and intent on swiping energy that belongs to the individuals is precisely what that verify was constructed for.”
Web page 78
“When six justices stroll away from these they’re supposed to guard, state constitutions maintain the road. That isn’t defiance. That’s the design.
State constitutionalism makes it straightforward to think about Roberts Courtroom jurisprudence ‘white noise.’
Add all of it up. Draining due course of. Rolling again voting rights. Flooding elections with cash. Rubber-stamping gerrymandering. Crowning a president. Blessing discrimination within the title of the Structure.
Taking a look at bare racism and seeing none of it. Mullin v. Doe, (racist phrases not ‘overtly racial’).
Making the nation extra harmful with a Second Modification unmoored from textual content or historical past and unrecognizable to the framers who wrote it. New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. Bruen; Wilson, 154 Hawaiʻi at 22, (‘disabl[ing] the states’ accountability to guard public security, scale back gun violence, and safeguard peaceable public motion’ with its lethal jurisprudence).
Then putting down a cautious legislation and displaying disdain for Hawaiʻi’s constitutional traditions.
ALOHA means hi there, goodbye and evidently judicial riot.
The Hawaii Supreme Ct simply printed a political manifesto masquerading as a judicial opinion. It calls SCOTUS racist, treats its rulings as “white noise” and declares itself past federal instruction. https://t.co/lw3wpXjLfI
— Eric Schmitt (@Eric_Schmitt) July 17, 2026
Advert block customers: Some website options might not work accurately whereas an advert blocker is enabled, as a result of they break scripts and content material this web site is determined by. If you cannot see feedback beneath, for instance, please disable your advert blocker.
