Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Smart Car Researcher Is Reinventing Traffic
    • Who Is The Real Aggressor – NATO Or Russia?
    • 10 Undefeated Teams Set for Showdown in Northeast Ohio
    • Congo river boat collision kills at least 30 as search continues for missing
    • Is Iran charging a toll to allow oil traffic through Hormuz? | US-Israel war on Iran News
    • Top rookie performers from NFL Week 4
    • Dennis Hastert, longtime Republican House speaker who went to prison, dies at age 84
    • The Housing Market Is Being Crushed By The Bond Market
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»Opinions»Contributor: California needs common-sense ID law to ensure votes count
    Opinions

    Contributor: California needs common-sense ID law to ensure votes count

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsSeptember 26, 2026No Comments5 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    By Invoice JonesVisitor contributor 

    Sept. 24, 2026 3:01 AM PT

    The election system I ran not exists.

    I served as California’s chief elections officer from 1995 to 2003. In that point, my customary by no means diverse: full participation, zero tolerance for fraud. I’ve by no means understood why these are handled as competing targets. The equipment that proves a poll is real is identical equipment that lets a voter belief that their vote was precisely counted. Weaken it and you don’t broaden the franchise. You devalue it.

    Within the years since I left workplace, California has rewritten almost each rule governing how a poll travels from a voter to an election official. It did so piecemeal, one invoice at a time, and by no means as soon as requested Californians whether or not they wished the cumulative end result.

    After I was secretary of state, absentee voting was a minority apply — roughly 2 million ballots, out of a complete of almost 8 million in my remaining common election. A voter who couldn’t return a poll personally may designate a partner, a mother or father, a baby, a sibling or somebody in the identical family.

    In 2016, Meeting Invoice 1921 modified that. Any particular person could now accumulate and return any variety of ballots. The regulation does require the particular person returning a poll to put in writing their identify, their relationship to the voter and their signature on the envelope, and it bars fee to gather the poll. However no election official verifies that the identify of the middleman is actual.

    In 2021, the Legislature made mail ballots common and everlasting, sending them to each identify on the rolls whether or not or not the voter requested. Within the final common election, somewhat greater than 13 million ballots have been returned by mail with somewhat greater than 16 million solid. And within the California particular election that lately handed, the quantity was astonishing: nearly 10.5 million votes by mail out of the 11.5 million whole votes solid.

    Contemplate what which means on the level the place it issues. When a mail poll comes again, California confirms it by evaluating the signature on the envelope with the signature on file. That’s the verification. Not an ID, not a quantity — a handwriting judgment, made by county workers of various coaching, utilized inconsistently throughout 58 counties with rejection charges that fluctuate accordingly. Yearly, hundreds of eligible Californians have ballots put aside as a result of a signature has modified with age or harm, and a few voters by no means study in time to repair it.

    That’s not a system anybody ought to defend. It’s unhealthy for safety and it’s unhealthy for voters, and people should not separate complaints.

    Proposition 39 on the November poll would handle this flawed system. The measure would require government-issued identification to vote in particular person, or the final 4 digits of a authorities ID quantity on a mail poll, and would require counties to report yearly on how a lot of their voter roll they’ve verified for citizenship.

    I do know the objections to voter ID. I’d have raised a few of them myself once I ran California’s elections. Necessities can, in restricted instances, turn out to be limitations — and typically when politicians push for voter ID, some observers suspect the actual purpose is voter suppression. Folks with out a driver’s license are disproportionately poor, aged or disabled, and a rule that assumes everybody has a pockets filled with paperwork will hold some eligible People from voting. That objection is severe. It’s also answerable, and this measure solutions it: Proposition 39 obligates the state to difficulty a voter ID card, free, to any voter who requests one. A requirement paired with a state obligation to fulfill it isn’t a barrier. It’s a service.

    Twice throughout my tenure, I used to be requested to watch elections overseas, in Nicaragua and in Mexico. I watched voters current a card and ink a thumb so they may not vote twice. I watched individuals stand within the warmth down dust roads all day for the possibility. What stayed with me was not the hardship. It was that residents of nations with far lower than ours had concluded {that a} vote that can not be verified is a vote that won’t be believed, and leaders had chosen to do the more durable factor.

    California is a rich state with a reliable civil service and no excuse. We will confirm our rolls, determine our voters and rely rapidly, and we will do all of it with out turning a single eligible citizen away.

    Confidence in an election shouldn’t be a temper. It’s constructed, intentionally, out of procedures that appear tedious proper up till the second a result’s disputed. Now we have spent 20 years letting ours erode. Proposition 39 is a spot to start out rebuilding.

    Invoice Jones served within the California Meeting from 1982 to 1994 and as California secretary of state from 1995 to 2003.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleTrump-Xi takeaways: If there were victories, Trump’s not sharing them
    Next Article Giants eyeing two-time Super Bowl champion QB after losing Jaxson Dart
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Opinions

    The Supreme Court’s most consequential cases of the new term

    October 5, 2026
    Opinions

    Column: Elon Musk — visionary and megalomaniac — thinks he’s going to save the world

    October 4, 2026
    Opinions

    Even Hollywood has warned us about our climate change horror show

    October 4, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    Contributor: Why the U.S. should pay families of civilians killed by the military

    September 13, 2026

    US stocks slide as strong data sends Treasury yields higher

    January 8, 2025

    $70,000 more a year for eggs: How price hikes are hurting small businesses

    March 8, 2025
    Our Picks

    Smart Car Researcher Is Reinventing Traffic

    October 5, 2026

    Who Is The Real Aggressor – NATO Or Russia?

    October 5, 2026

    10 Undefeated Teams Set for Showdown in Northeast Ohio

    October 5, 2026
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.