Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Senator John Fetterman Slams DSA Members as ‘Deeply Anti-American’ (VIDEO) * The Gateway Pundit * by Mike LaChance
    • Users of Meta’s Facebook, Instagram report suffering some outages
    • Why is India vetting books in Kashmir in search of ‘anti-national’ content? | Censorship News
    • One key family member might lead LeBron James to the Warriors
    • Column: Judge’s ‘blistering’ ruling in Trump’s IRS lawsuit takes aim at Todd Blanche’s ethics
    • Epstein survivor says acting AG Blanche was ‘abrasive, condescending’ during meeting
    • DSA Activist Linda Sarsour Wants to Replace the Declaration of Independence With Something That Reflects the Values of the Radical Left (VIDEO)
    • Kyiv hit with deadly strikes after attack on Russian e-commerce giant
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»Opinions»A regressive rate tax could fill the Social Security reserve gap
    Opinions

    A regressive rate tax could fill the Social Security reserve gap

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsJune 13, 2026No Comments1 Min Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    To the editor: For wage earners, the Social Safety tax is currently 6.2% for each worker and employer for the primary $184,500 of annual wages, falling to zero on all wages past that (self-employed people pay 12.4% of the primary $184,500 of internet earnings).

    A generally prompt treatment for the projected reserve fund depletion is to easily lengthen or eradicate the taxable wage cap, which is at present yearly adjusted upward for inflation (“The Social Security crisis should be dominating the Senate campaign,” June 12). What by no means appears to be thought of is adjusting the tax fee. I might assume that going from a hard and fast fee to a regressive fee would procure extra income and will truly scale back the tax for many wage earners (necessary for political acceptance).

    It may look one thing like this: 6% tax on employer and worker on the primary $200,000 earned; 5% on the subsequent $100,000; adopted by 4% to three% to 2% on $100,000 increments to ultimately 1% for earnings over $600,000 yearly. Whereas this may not procure the identical income as merely eliminating the wage cap, it might be rather more palatable politically.

    Bob Fey, Orange



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleTrump’s name must be removed from Kennedy Center by noon Saturday, judge says
    Next Article The ‘NBA blocks champions’ quiz
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Opinions

    Column: Judge’s ‘blistering’ ruling in Trump’s IRS lawsuit takes aim at Todd Blanche’s ethics

    July 19, 2026
    Opinions

    Letters to the Editor: ‘Polystyrene foam should have never been born. Let it die.’

    July 18, 2026
    Opinions

    Trump’s repeated lies about our elections show a lack of respect

    July 18, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    Lions, Chiefs players brawl after hard-fought game

    October 13, 2025

    Guterres warns UN faces ‘imminent financial collapse’ | United Nations News

    January 30, 2026

    Supreme Court allows Trump to terminate 16,000 probationary federal workers

    April 8, 2025
    Our Picks

    Senator John Fetterman Slams DSA Members as ‘Deeply Anti-American’ (VIDEO) * The Gateway Pundit * by Mike LaChance

    July 19, 2026

    Users of Meta’s Facebook, Instagram report suffering some outages

    July 19, 2026

    Why is India vetting books in Kashmir in search of ‘anti-national’ content? | Censorship News

    July 19, 2026
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.