Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Meta shares fall as frustration grows over AI spending plans
    • Market Talk – July 29, 2026
    • Marjorie Taylor Greene Marries Conservative Journalist Brian Glenn in Las Vegas Wedding * The Gateway Pundit * by Jim Hᴏft
    • West Bank violence, annexation ‘only getting worse’: UN
    • Myanmar court sentences activists to 37 years over election protest | Prison News
    • Is FIFA selling off the World Cup? Your questions answered
    • Letters to the Editor: Silence in the LAPD ‘should not be the city’s most expensive policy’
    • Manhattan DA challenges Trump’s appeal of his 2024 hush money conviction
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»Opinions»A regressive rate tax could fill the Social Security reserve gap
    Opinions

    A regressive rate tax could fill the Social Security reserve gap

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsJune 13, 2026No Comments1 Min Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    To the editor: For wage earners, the Social Safety tax is currently 6.2% for each worker and employer for the primary $184,500 of annual wages, falling to zero on all wages past that (self-employed people pay 12.4% of the primary $184,500 of internet earnings).

    A generally prompt treatment for the projected reserve fund depletion is to easily lengthen or eradicate the taxable wage cap, which is at present yearly adjusted upward for inflation (“The Social Security crisis should be dominating the Senate campaign,” June 12). What by no means appears to be thought of is adjusting the tax fee. I might assume that going from a hard and fast fee to a regressive fee would procure extra income and will truly scale back the tax for many wage earners (necessary for political acceptance).

    It may look one thing like this: 6% tax on employer and worker on the primary $200,000 earned; 5% on the subsequent $100,000; adopted by 4% to three% to 2% on $100,000 increments to ultimately 1% for earnings over $600,000 yearly. Whereas this may not procure the identical income as merely eliminating the wage cap, it might be rather more palatable politically.

    Bob Fey, Orange



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleTrump’s name must be removed from Kennedy Center by noon Saturday, judge says
    Next Article The ‘NBA blocks champions’ quiz
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Opinions

    Letters to the Editor: Silence in the LAPD ‘should not be the city’s most expensive policy’

    July 29, 2026
    Opinions

    Mothers share the hardships they face with society’s lack of support

    July 29, 2026
    Opinions

    Letters to the Editor: San Luis Obispo proved that communities don’t need drive-throughs

    July 29, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    Mamdani won big, but it’s a mistake to think all Democrats swung left: ANALYSIS

    June 24, 2026

    Kevin Durant may have played his last game with Suns

    April 1, 2025

    Lakers make major announcement concerning Rob Pelinka

    April 19, 2025
    Our Picks

    Meta shares fall as frustration grows over AI spending plans

    July 29, 2026

    Market Talk – July 29, 2026

    July 29, 2026

    Marjorie Taylor Greene Marries Conservative Journalist Brian Glenn in Las Vegas Wedding * The Gateway Pundit * by Jim Hᴏft

    July 29, 2026
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.