Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • The End Of The Anonymous Internet
    • Bam Adebayo scores 83 points, second highest in NBA history
    • Israel pounds Lebanon, targets residential building in central Beirut | US-Israel war on Iran News
    • 2026 NFL free-agency winners, losers: Ravens offseason takes big hit
    • Math teacher found dead inside Baltimore elementary school classroom
    • Canada’s Housing Crisis Shows The Consequences Of The Easy Money Era
    • North Korea says it respects Iran’s choice of new supreme leader: Report
    • Qatar’s foreign minister says ‘regional countries are not an enemy of Iran’ | US-Israel war on Iran News
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»Opinions»Letters to the Editor: Why fireproof homes might do surprisingly little to help the occupant
    Opinions

    Letters to the Editor: Why fireproof homes might do surprisingly little to help the occupant

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsNovember 20, 2025No Comments1 Min Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Nov. 20, 2025 6 AM PT

    To the editor: I’ve lived in Los Angeles for 50 years. I began taking part in evacuations in 1961 (“‘Herd immunity’: Pushing a coastal community to become fireproof after the Palisades fire,” Nov. 12). Bel-Air within the ‘60s, Malibu within the ‘70s, Sunland within the ‘80s, Pacific Palisades within the ‘90s. All skilled massive wildfires.

    I knew numerous good, cussed engineers and that is what I realized from their efforts: Constructing homes that may’t burn doesn’t do something good for the occupant. Until you adorn like a jail, with concrete and stainless-steel, and preserve no possessions, every part inside melts, cooks and contaminates. Home equipment, plastic pipes — principally, you’re engineering a poisonous shell that prices some huge cash to get rid of.

    Daniel Eisenberg, Los Angeles



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleJobs report blows past expectations, defying hiring slowdown
    Next Article Texas HC Steve Sarkisian gives bold claim on job rumors
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Opinions

    Contributor: The U.S. and Israel don’t agree on what victory in Iran looks like

    March 11, 2026
    Opinions

    Contributor: Why romance novels are no longer a ‘guilty pleasure’

    March 11, 2026
    Opinions

    Letters to the Editor: Iran isn’t going to give Trump the unconditional surrender he wants

    March 10, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    Snap Insight: No Ukraine ceasefire – Putin has called Trump’s bluff

    March 19, 2025

    Pope Francis has pneumonia but remains in ‘good spirits,’ Vatican says

    February 18, 2025

    ‘Not elite’? Phillies star Bryce Harper has a plan to return to form

    February 26, 2026
    Our Picks

    The End Of The Anonymous Internet

    March 11, 2026

    Bam Adebayo scores 83 points, second highest in NBA history

    March 11, 2026

    Israel pounds Lebanon, targets residential building in central Beirut | US-Israel war on Iran News

    March 11, 2026
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.