Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Shadow Walker Was a DIY Biped Humanoid Robot
    • Two hundred hurt in post-game violence as Paris hails second Champions League triumph
    • Germany World Cup 2026 team preview: Players to watch, group and squad list | World Cup 2026 News
    • Dave Roberts provides worrisome update on Tyler Glasnow
    • ‘Fight Club’ was fictional. We shouldn’t see it at the White House
    • Booker says he’s ‘absolutely expecting’ more Republican opposition to Trump
    • No Dong Jun, but plenty of China at Shangri-La Dialogue
    • Japan rejects ‘new militarism’, says China is rapidly arming | News
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»Opinions»Rosalind Franklin made James Watson’s historic discoveries possible
    Opinions

    Rosalind Franklin made James Watson’s historic discoveries possible

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsNovember 11, 2025No Comments1 Min Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Nov. 11, 2025 6:30 AM PT

    To the editor: James Watson’s 1962 Nobel Prize, awarded collectively with Francis Crick and Maurice Wilkins, is among the many best-known Nobel honors (“James Watson, Nobel Prize winner and DNA pioneer, dies,” Nov. 7). It must be famous, nevertheless, that it was British chemist Rosalind Franklin who, in May 1952, made Watson’s achievement potential by exhibiting in her well-known {Photograph} 51 that DNA was a double helix, not a triple helix favored by Caltech’s Linus Pauling. Sadly, Franklin couldn’t win a Nobel Prize as a result of she died of ovarian most cancers in 1958, at age 37, and the prize isn’t awarded posthumously.

    The outspoken and controversial Watson had described Franklin unflatteringly in his 1968 guide “The Double Helix.” Nonetheless, years later, he agreed that Franklin’s work was indispensable to figuring out the construction of DNA in remarks he made in 2000 on the opening of King’s School’s Franklin-Wilkins constructing in London.

    Harold N. Bass, Porter Ranch



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleJimmy Kimmel’s bandleader Cleto Escobedo III dies
    Next Article The ‘2024-25 NBA scoring leaders by team’ quiz
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Opinions

    ‘Fight Club’ was fictional. We shouldn’t see it at the White House

    May 31, 2026
    Opinions

    Column: Americans want to rebuild the wall between church and state

    May 31, 2026
    Opinions

    Letters to the Editor: I’m conflicted about my Vietnam service. It makes me worry about Iran

    May 30, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    Savvy Quentin Grimes deal comes at the perfect time for 76ers

    October 1, 2025

    Is Russia really ‘grooming’ Western AI? | Media

    July 8, 2025

    Snapchat to start charging users for Memories storage

    October 1, 2025
    Our Picks

    Shadow Walker Was a DIY Biped Humanoid Robot

    May 31, 2026

    Two hundred hurt in post-game violence as Paris hails second Champions League triumph

    May 31, 2026

    Germany World Cup 2026 team preview: Players to watch, group and squad list | World Cup 2026 News

    May 31, 2026
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.