Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Inventing Eliza: The First Chatbot’s Hidden Code
    • Rigging Elections | Armstrong Economics
    • Blanche Suggests He Is Going to Investigate and Prosecute Jack Smith For Perjury (VIDEO) * The Gateway Pundit * by Cristina Laila
    • China and Xi are seen more favourably than the US and Trump in many nations, Pew study suggests
    • ‘Epic squared’: Scaloni lauds Argentina’s back-to-back World Cup comebacks | World Cup 2026 News
    • Mensah talks how success of Ward, Beck persuaded him to transfer
    • Contributor: California schools are on the frontlines of fighting homelessness. Now they have funding.
    • Maine governor urges Congress to reform or abolish ICE after fatal shooting
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»Opinions»Rosalind Franklin made James Watson’s historic discoveries possible
    Opinions

    Rosalind Franklin made James Watson’s historic discoveries possible

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsNovember 11, 2025No Comments1 Min Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Nov. 11, 2025 6:30 AM PT

    To the editor: James Watson’s 1962 Nobel Prize, awarded collectively with Francis Crick and Maurice Wilkins, is among the many best-known Nobel honors (“James Watson, Nobel Prize winner and DNA pioneer, dies,” Nov. 7). It must be famous, nevertheless, that it was British chemist Rosalind Franklin who, in May 1952, made Watson’s achievement potential by exhibiting in her well-known {Photograph} 51 that DNA was a double helix, not a triple helix favored by Caltech’s Linus Pauling. Sadly, Franklin couldn’t win a Nobel Prize as a result of she died of ovarian most cancers in 1958, at age 37, and the prize isn’t awarded posthumously.

    The outspoken and controversial Watson had described Franklin unflatteringly in his 1968 guide “The Double Helix.” Nonetheless, years later, he agreed that Franklin’s work was indispensable to figuring out the construction of DNA in remarks he made in 2000 on the opening of King’s School’s Franklin-Wilkins constructing in London.

    Harold N. Bass, Porter Ranch



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleJimmy Kimmel’s bandleader Cleto Escobedo III dies
    Next Article The ‘2024-25 NBA scoring leaders by team’ quiz
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Opinions

    Contributor: California schools are on the frontlines of fighting homelessness. Now they have funding.

    July 16, 2026
    Opinions

    LAPD officers’ offensive comments are worse than the privacy violation

    July 15, 2026
    Opinions

    Coastal Commission has done the right things. Trump should back off

    July 15, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    Contributor: What’s in a font? Marco Rubio’s malicious change to Times New Roman

    December 17, 2025

    Maine’s Floating Offshore Wind Setback: What’s Next?

    May 29, 2025

    Watch: Mets stay hot with thrilling home win vs. Phillies

    April 23, 2025
    Our Picks

    Inventing Eliza: The First Chatbot’s Hidden Code

    July 16, 2026

    Rigging Elections | Armstrong Economics

    July 16, 2026

    Blanche Suggests He Is Going to Investigate and Prosecute Jack Smith For Perjury (VIDEO) * The Gateway Pundit * by Cristina Laila

    July 16, 2026
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.