Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Is small the new big?
    • Scott Adams, Dilbert cartoonist who satirised office life, dies at 68
    • What’s at stake in Uganda’s presidential election? | Elections
    • Mike Tomlin’s Steelers tenure was massive success, but both sides needed change
    • Letters to the Editor: A fire victim’s eloquent writings generated empathy in this reader
    • US, for 1st time in 50 years, experienced negative net migration in 2025: Report
    • Members Petitioning to Be President-Elect Candidates
    • Market Talk – January 13, 2026
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»Opinions»Dodgers’ and Giants’ Big Oil ads are just economic competition
    Opinions

    Dodgers’ and Giants’ Big Oil ads are just economic competition

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsJune 5, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    To the editor: Neither the Dodgers nor the Giants are advocating for petroleum over clear power (“What do the Dodgers and Giants have in common? An iconic ad — for Big Oil,” Could 29). They’re each offering paid advert companies for rivals within the petroleum merchandise trade, which might be with us till we’re in a position to substitute all fossil fuels with 100% clear power sources.

    The clear power trigger is completely essential to our future. We’re getting there fairly rapidly, however within the meantime, rivals gonna compete, they usually’re going to make use of adverts to take action. Promoting for anyone or all of them is neither a sin nor against the law, nor even naughty. It’s merely competitors, and none of it ought to be held as in the slightest degree despicable so long as the financial system continues to require some fossil fuels.

    In any case, would you inform individuals who would freeze to dying in the event that they didn’t burn coal that they had been doing one thing immoral, unethical and even illogical, if that was all they’d to warmth their house?

    Mark Driskill, Lengthy Seaside

    ..

    To the editor: I recognize columnist Sammy Roth’s spirited commentaries about Large Oil promoting at sporting occasions. Nevertheless, if ever there was a tempest in a teapot, it’s this problem. I can’t recall anybody ever saying, “Wow! I noticed the 76 advert at Dodger Stadium. I’m shopping for extra gasoline!” To be truthful, I’ve been going to Dodger Stadium for greater than 50 years and I couldn’t inform you who else has an advert. I’m typically watching the sport.

    Jeffrey R. Knott, Fullerton

    ..

    To the editor: Within the latest Boiling Level, the shot taken at Phillips 66 is open for debate. One a part of the article conveys disappointment from native Dodger followers that the long-lasting 76 brand will now additionally adorn the outfield of the rival San Francisco Giants (significantly, who cares?). Others are asking to take down the emblem in each stadiums due to its affiliation with the fossil gasoline trade.

    The common reader, I consider, can see either side, though most often reluctantly. However right here’s a 3rd subject of debate to contemplate. Once you go searching stunning Dodger Stadium — be it the bull pens, the scoreboards or alongside the foul strains — what do you see? Large four-color ads for alcoholic drinks that, when closely consumed, could cause distraction and security issues for followers and households simply eager to get pleasure from an evening out on the stadium. Heavy consumption of those merchandise, and the aforementioned promotion of alcohol on this surroundings, by no means results in something good. Fan arguments and fights within the stands or, even worse, malicious assaults within the car parking zone after the sport. Sure, they’re completely different subjects, nevertheless it’s one thing to consider.

    Richard Whorton, Studio Metropolis



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous Article‘CRAZY’: Trump and Musk feud erupts on social media
    Next Article White Sox make announcement about their ownership situation
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Opinions

    Letters to the Editor: A fire victim’s eloquent writings generated empathy in this reader

    January 14, 2026
    Opinions

    Loud engine noise is an easy problem to fix. Simply enforce the law

    January 13, 2026
    Opinions

    Column: Trump isn’t interested in being honorable — he’d rather be feared

    January 13, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    NEW BOOK ON MARTIN A. ARMSTRONG – THE ARMSTRONG ECONOMIC CODE

    November 15, 2025

    Venezuelan opposition leader Machado injured on covert Nobel Prize trip | Nicolas Maduro News

    December 16, 2025

    Vera Rubin Engineering – IEEE Spectrum

    July 3, 2025
    Our Picks

    Is small the new big?

    January 14, 2026

    Scott Adams, Dilbert cartoonist who satirised office life, dies at 68

    January 14, 2026

    What’s at stake in Uganda’s presidential election? | Elections

    January 14, 2026
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.