Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • US lawmakers push for AI ‘kill switch’ after OpenAI goes rogue
    • Is Your Lettuce Safe to Eat? Is Any of Your Produce Safe?
    • Landslide death toll rises to 11 in southwest China, 50 still missing
    • Indian activist Wangchuk ends 26-day hunger strike over exam paper leaks | Protests News
    • Dale Earnhardt Jr. afraid to see what happens to Josh Berry amid ‘crappy’ outlook
    • Contributor: Waymos save lives. So why are some people still skeptical?
    • DOJ agrees to withdraw subpoenas for New York Times journalists
    • Amazon gaming boss predicts future where players no longer need consoles
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»US News»DOJ agrees to withdraw subpoenas for New York Times journalists
    US News

    DOJ agrees to withdraw subpoenas for New York Times journalists

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsJuly 23, 2026No Comments5 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Attorneys with the Division of Justice on Thursday agreed to unilaterally withdraw a series of subpoenas that sought to compel New York Instances journalists to testify about their sources and to entry their cellphone data. 

    U.S. District Decide Arun Subramanian mentioned he would quash the subpoenas if the Division of Justice refused to withdraw them. 

    “It is a matter of fundamental compliance with the legislation,” Decide Subramanian mentioned. 

    Attorneys for the New York Instances have been in court docket Thursday to combat a sequence of grand jury subpoenas they allege have been an try to retaliate towards and intimidate reporters whose work angered President Donald Trump. 

    Attorneys for the newspaper had requested the decide to quash the subpoenas, which sought to compel the journalists to testify about their sources, in addition to entry the cellphone data of the reporters and a few of their relations. 

    Sean Buckley, the chief counsel to the U.S. lawyer for the Southern District of New York, mentioned that prosecutors would return to the decide in the event that they resolve to hunt new subpoenas sooner or later. 

    “Upon additional consideration, the federal government is ready unilaterally to withdraw the subpoenas right now,” he mentioned. 

    On this Could 20, 2026, file photograph, The New York Instances constructing is proven in New York.

    Michael M. Santiago/Getty Photos, FILE

    Buckley acknowledged in open court docket that the Division of Justice served the subpoenas earlier than finishing up some preliminary investigative steps — a requirement imposed by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court docket of Appeals.

    “Does not that flip the legislation and laws on its head?” Subramanian requested. “Subpoenas are the final step, not step one.” 

    Federal prosecutors additionally admitted to a sequence of errors and “imprecise” wording that led the DOJ to hunt further subpoenas, even after legal professionals for the New York Instances raised considerations in regards to the legality of the preliminary subpoenas. 

    “Whenever you see one thing like this, if this have been a civil proceedin. … what I might usually do is ask the events to indicate trigger why sanctions should not subject or steps should not be taken with respect to the wrong statements and misstatements,” Subramanian mentioned in regards to the errors and oversights made by the Division of Justice.

    Attorneys for the New York Instances criticized the actions of the Justice Division, saying the “document is replete with dangerous religion.” 

    The Division of Justice defended the subpoenas in court docket filings, arguing they have been making an attempt to determine if authorities staff are leaking categorized info that impacts nationwide safety. 

    “The above-referenced articles introduced a considerable nationwide safety concern, together with as a result of they indicated potential leaks of categorized or nationwide protection info that appeared to have been offered to the Instances when the President of the USA, senior officers, and reporters have been flying in overseas airspace throughout a time of hostilities with a overseas adversary that has made clear its intent to hurt the President and U.S. pursuits,” wrote Sean Buckley, the Deputy United States Lawyer for the Southern District of New York. 

    Nevertheless, legal professionals for the New York Instances argued that the subpoenas have been illegal and unconstitutional as a result of they “have been issued in a foul religion effort to harass,” intimidate and retaliate towards the newspaper, which they mentioned, “has been a specific lightning rod for the President’s ire.” 

    “Each indication helps the conclusion that the Administration issued the Subpoenas as a result of the reporting enraged the President and embarrassed him by resurfacing and reinforcing criticism about his acceptance of a jet from a overseas authorities and his insistence on rapidly retrofitting it to be used as Air Drive One,” the Instances attorneys wrote. 

    The Qatari royal household donated the $400 million Boeing 747-8 to the USA final yr, and the Air Drive had estimated it will price lower than $400 million to retrofit the airplane. It is unclear how a lot cash has been spent on the airplane thus far, and the airplane is anticipated to endure further upgrades.

    Shortly earlier than Trump leaves workplace, the possession of the airplane is anticipated to be transferred to the Donald J. Trump Presidential Library Basis, so Trump can proceed utilizing the luxurious plane. 

    Attorneys for the New York Instances additionally argued that the subpoenas violate the fundamental journalistic protections affirmed by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court docket of Appeals, which established a three-part check to guage if a journalist should disclose their sources. Below that check, prosecutors would wish to show that they’ve exhausted all different choices to get the data. 

    “The timing compels the conclusion that the Authorities didn’t even attempt to adjust to its personal laws governing media subpoenas,” legal professionals for the New York Instances wrote in a court docket submitting, highlighting that the subpoenas have been served inside a day of the investigation starting. “In that transient interval, the Authorities plainly didn’t have time to begin, a lot much less conduct, an investigation of any suspected leak of categorized or Nationwide Protection Info.” 

    The Instances has additionally accused the Division of Justice of violating their very own pointers for notifying reporters in regards to the subpoenas, in addition to issuing one other subpoena after the outlet filed its movement to quash the preliminary subpoenas. In response to a court docket submitting final week, the Division of Justice served at the least two subpoenas to cellphone suppliers after the New York Instances raised considerations in regards to the lawfulness of the primary subpoenas.   

    Federal prosecutors deny that they violated DOJ insurance policies, failed to hold out preliminary investigative steps, or lack a authorized foundation for the probe. 

    “We worth and recognize the essential function that the press performs on this nation, however DOJ additionally performs an essential function to ensure that the folks entrusted with our nation’s secrets and techniques do what they’re imagined to do with that info, which suggests not sharing categorized info,” a Division of Justice spokesperson mentioned earlier this month. 



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleAmazon gaming boss predicts future where players no longer need consoles
    Next Article Contributor: Waymos save lives. So why are some people still skeptical?
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    US News

    Global oil prices cross $100 a barrel as Iran war sends fuel prices surging

    July 23, 2026
    US News

    President Trump says enrichment not part of US-Saudi civil nuclear energy agreement

    July 23, 2026
    US News

    EU hits Google with $1 billion fine over its Play app store and search

    July 23, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    Inflation and income inequality made the American Dream inaccessible

    January 17, 2026

    Top Federal Reserve official says it would be ‘mistake’ to ignore Donald Trump’s tariffs

    February 5, 2025

    Trump files $15 billion defamation suit against New York Times, Penguin Random House

    September 16, 2025
    Our Picks

    US lawmakers push for AI ‘kill switch’ after OpenAI goes rogue

    July 23, 2026

    Is Your Lettuce Safe to Eat? Is Any of Your Produce Safe?

    July 23, 2026

    Landslide death toll rises to 11 in southwest China, 50 still missing

    July 23, 2026
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.