Watchdog’s name for ‘robust system’ comes as US and Iran challenge conflicting claims over ceasefire negotiations.
Printed On 26 Jun 2026
The pinnacle of the Worldwide Atomic Vitality Company (IAEA) has asserted {that a} “very robust system of verification” should by put in place to observe Iran’s nuclear programme.
Director Normal Rafael Grossi referred to as on Friday for the nuclear watchdog to be given full entry, noting that guaranteeing Iran shouldn’t be capable of develop nuclear weapons is the important thing goal of the preliminary ceasefire settlement with the USA.
Beneficial Tales
checklist of three objectsfinish of checklist
The US and its Western allies have for years warned that Tehran’s nuclear programme could also be aimed toward growing the capability to construct a weapon. Iran has all the time firmly denied it has any such intention, insisting its ambitions for the programme are strictly civilian.
“The federal government of Iran has affirmed fairly clearly that [developing nuclear weapons] shouldn’t be their intention, however in fact intentions should not sufficient,” Grossi informed reporters on Friday. “As a way to have certainty, we have to have a really robust system of verification as quickly as practicable.”
The IAEA’s place is to not decide intentions, he careworn, but it surely additionally can not settle for issues at face worth. “We should confirm in all places.”
Inspections of Iran’s nuclear websites, which had been attacked by the US and Israel in a 12-day war final June, have develop into a key level of disagreement as Washington and Tehran proceed negotiations to safe a everlasting peace deal based mostly on the 14-point memorandum of understanding signed earlier this month.
Tehran suspended cooperation with the IAEA following the US and Israeli assaults final 12 months. In September, it agreed to permit inspectors to return, and IAEA officers have since visited nuclear websites within the nation.
Nonetheless, Iran has not but granted entry to the nuclear websites that had been bombed, and its shops of enriched uranium stay unaccounted for.
‘Battle of statements’
Each the US and Iran have made contradictory statements in regards to the challenge as they’ve continued talks aimed toward a long-term ceasefire.
The US has claimed that inspections had been totally agreed on within the MoU and subsequent talks; Iran has mentioned dialogue on the subject stays restricted for now.
Iranian Deputy Overseas Minister Kazem Gharibabadi said on Wednesday that entry to the attacked nuclear websites and supplies can be examined and resolved “throughout the framework of a remaining settlement” with the US.
He mentioned United Nations inspections had been depending on the US taking “sensible motion in terminating all sanctions”.
The US maintains this isn’t the case. President Donald Trump has dismissed Tehran’s “protestations and false statements” and claimed Iran has agreed to “highest degree nuclear inspections”.
Grossi famous that “a warfare of statements” is being waged, however famous that the MoU particularly indicated that the nuclear a part of the settlement would “be supervised by the IAEA”.
“The technical work has began, and we hope to be there quickly,” he added.
When it comes to timing, Grossi mentioned “it’s not important if we go in a single week or two weeks” and pointed to the truth that the MoU has a number of components except for the nuclear challenge.
Iran’s Ministry of Overseas Affairs on Friday as soon as extra rejected the accusations relating to its nuclear programme, because it responded to a joint assertion issued by the US secretary of state and Gulf Cooperation Council international ministers, which yesterday said their shared goal of stopping Tehran from growing a nuclear weapon.
Stressing that Iran’s programme stays “peaceable”, it mentioned in an announcement that the accusations are fabricated by the US and Israel, and went on to induce GCC member states to cooperate with Tehran on establishing a nuclear-weapons-free zone in West Asia.
