The Wisconsin Supreme Courtroom rejected on Sunday night time Wisconsin Lawyer Basic Josh Kaul’s lawsuit to cease Elon Musk and America PAC from executing a deliberate giveaway on Sunday night time of $1 million every to 2 attendees at a city corridor in Inexperienced Bay, Wisconsin.
The order got here simply minutes earlier than the occasion — backing conservative candidate Brad Schimel — was set to start out.
Notably, the courtroom additionally rejected a bid from Musk’s legal professionals to ask two justices, who had campaigned for Wisconsin Supreme Courtroom candidate Susan Crawford, to recuse themselves.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk boards Air Pressure One with President Donald Trump as they departs for Philadelphia, from Morristown Municipal Airport in Morristown, New Jersey, March 22, 2025.
Nathan Howard/Reuters
The ruling got here after an appeals courtroom on Saturday denied Kaul’s emergency movement to cease the giveaway from happening.
Kaul wrote in his preliminary submitting on Friday that he was asking for emergency aid to cease Musk and America PAC “from additional selling a million-dollar giveaway to attendees of a deliberate occasion on Sunday, March 30, 2025, and prohibiting Respondents from making any funds to Wisconsin electors to vote.”
Nonetheless, the choose assigned to the case, the Honorable Columbia County Circuit Courtroom Choose W. Andrew Voigt, refused to listen to the lawsuit earlier than Sunday’s Inexperienced Bay rally with Musk — prompting Kaul’s emergency movement asking a Courtroom of Appeals to take motion.
After that emergency movement was rejected, Kaul appealed to the Wisconsin Supreme Courtroom to step in on Sunday.
Attorneys for Elon Musk and America PAC then filed motions for the recusal of Wisconsin Supreme Courtroom Justices Rebecca Frank Dallet and Jill J. Karofsky.
They argued that as a result of Dallet and Karofsky campaigned for Crawford, and Crawford has been vital of Musk, “to keep away from any potential perceptions of bias and manifestations of potential bias, Justices Dallet and Karofsky ought to decline to take part in consideration of this matter.”
The legal professionals additionally framed the deliberate Sunday night time giveaways as “spokesperson agreements” for spokespeople for the PAC.
Within the preliminary lawsuit, shared by Kaul’s workplace, Kaul argued that “Musk’s announcement of his intention to pay $1 million to 2 Wisconsin electors who attend his occasion on Sunday night time, particularly conditioned on their having voted within the upcoming April 3, 2025, Wisconsin Supreme Courtroom election, is a blatant try to violate” state regulation, which “forbids anybody from providing or promising to provide something of worth to an elector to be able to induce the elector to go to the polls, vote or chorus from voting, or vote for a specific particular person.”
The go well with requested for a restraining order “prohibiting Defendants from any additional promotion of the million-dollar presents to attendees of the deliberate Sunday March 30, 2025,” in addition to a short lived restraining order “prohibiting Defendants from making any funds to Wisconsin electors to vote,” and injunctive aid to “restrain and prohibit all actions by Defendants taken in furtherance of a deliberate violation” of the state regulation.
Thus far, two political teams aligned with Musk — America PAC and Constructing America’s Future — have poured almost $20 million into supporting Schimel for the open seat.
The world’s richest man has used money giveaways prior to now, together with a controversial $1 million sweepstakes supplied to voters in swing states throughout final yr’s election cycle as a part of an effort to spice up President Donald Trump’s possibilities of successful in these states.
The Wisconsin Supreme Courtroom election, on Tuesday, has usually develop into the middle of a political firestorm, and has develop into the costliest state supreme courtroom race in American historical past, based on the Brennan Heart for Justice at New York College.
