Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Free Space Optical Link Tackles Urban Connectivity
    • US Senate likely to reject bid to curb Trump’s Iran war powers
    • Why Washington can’t stop Trump on Iran | News
    • Aaron Rodgers reveals update about contract status with Steelers
    • Contributor: U.S. attack on Iran echoes Russia’s invasion of Ukraine
    • 911 calls from ICE detention center underscore concerns about conditions, advocates say
    • The Aria EV Shows the Potential of EV Battery Swapping
    • US kills Iranian leader of Trump assassination plot, Pentagon says
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»Opinions»We can’t let ‘anti-science’ harm our efforts to rein in climate change
    Opinions

    We can’t let ‘anti-science’ harm our efforts to rein in climate change

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsSeptember 5, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Sept. 5, 2025 5 AM PT

    To the editor: As this text explains, “the essential science of the Earth’s local weather has been nicely established by means of a long time of analysis” (“‘Not scientifically credible’: Scientists repudiate Trump administration climate report,” Sept. 3).

    Sadly, science is now taking a again seat to the wishful pondering of the Trump administration, and this federal report, ignoring a lot of the science, is getting used to cease us from transferring ahead to rein in local weather change, which has already cost us billions in weather-related disasters.

    Rising fossil gasoline use and slowing the transition to scrub power are simply going to make us sicker with air pollution and make our surroundings “sicker” with floods, storms, warmth waves, rising sea ranges and extra excessive fires, which we’ve seen right here in California this 12 months.

    We should always all be peppering our representatives to combat towards this anti-science that’s going to hurt us and inspiring them to persuade their Republican colleagues to hearken to the scientists.

    Maggie Wineburgh-Freed, Los Angeles

    ..

    To the editor: I’ve been browsing for 70 years. Once I began, I additionally performed with the sand crabs, and I bear in mind two species. I chased the shore birds — at the very least 5 species. I bought tangled within the seaweed. My mates would paddle past the surf line and fish for dinner. That was El Porto then. El Porto’s shores at the moment are barren of sea life.

    I earned a sophisticated diploma, which landed me a job at Boeing designing flight management methods for 747s. Once I watched Al Gore’s film “An Inconvenient Reality” and noticed the graph of the Earth’s temperatures fluctuating greater, I grew to become very, very involved. This graph, to me, seemed like a 747 gone uncontrolled; a demise spiral, besides it was our planet’s well being that was plummeting.

    Immediately, I can see the colour of the ocean altering, an indicator that the water is getting hotter.

    Inform me, who am I to consider: scientists employed by an administration led by a person who stated “find 11,780 votes” or my very own eyes?

    Gregg Ferry, Carlsbad

    ..

    To the editor: This report is only one extra instance that the Trump administration lives by the maxim in George Orwell’s “1984”: “Ignorance is energy.”

    John Beckman, Chino Hills

    ..

    To the editor: Concerning our local weather, we’re enjoying Russian roulette with our coverage and the gun is aimed on the heads of our youngsters and grandchildren.

    This (not peer-reviewed) Division of Power report, by 5 climate-science outliers, continues this administration’s propensity for simply making stuff up. Sure, there’s uncertainty, however there’s additionally loads of proof that local weather scientists are higher at predicting temperatures than economists are at predicting value tendencies.

    Oil and gasoline air pollution (not counting any climate-related bills) is answerable for over 91,000 annual untimely deaths within the U.S., in response to a recent study, and renewables at the moment are our most cost-effective and healthiest power supply. For our well being and economic system, we must always cease subsidizing fossil fuels with our lives and {dollars}.

    Tom Hazelleaf, Seal Seaside



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleAt least 450 people taken into ICE custody at Hyundai plant in Georgia
    Next Article Fever’s Caitlin Clark makes monumental decision
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Opinions

    Contributor: U.S. attack on Iran echoes Russia’s invasion of Ukraine

    March 4, 2026
    Opinions

    Letters: When you lose someone to gun violence, it affects you forever

    March 4, 2026
    Opinions

    Story of an abandoned dog is both heartbreaking and uplifting

    March 4, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    Contributor: The planet’s other forest crisis

    February 20, 2026

    One of these five teams will win the 2025-26 CFP National Championship

    May 31, 2025

    Trump’s Teflon tested as Epstein saga looms over 2026 campaign

    November 16, 2025
    Our Picks

    Free Space Optical Link Tackles Urban Connectivity

    March 4, 2026

    US Senate likely to reject bid to curb Trump’s Iran war powers

    March 4, 2026

    Why Washington can’t stop Trump on Iran | News

    March 4, 2026
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.