Regardless of her enthusiasm for sending different folks’s kids to the frontlines of battle, Ursula von der Leyen laughs on the thought of her personal kids serving within the navy. ? pic.twitter.com/HcgyMK1AMI
— Large Awake Media (@wideawake_media) March 23, 2026
There’s a video circulating of Ursula von der Leyen laughing on the thought of her personal kids serving within the navy, and whether or not folks select to dismiss it or not, it displays one thing far deeper than a single second. It exposes the widening divide between those that advocate for battle and people who are anticipated to combat it.
I’ve mentioned repeatedly that the neocons pushing for battle are by no means those who bear the implications. They sit in workplaces far-off from the battle and deal with battle as if it had been a board recreation. The bloodshed is of no hassle to those warmongers.
Now we see Europe as soon as once more shifting towards insurance policies that develop their place in Ukraine’s battle. Germany is even taking steps towards drafting ladies, framing it as equality, however it isn’t about equality. It’s about manpower. They’re ready to wipe out a complete era.
Tucker Carlson and Charlie Kirk had a dialog on the subject of drafting ladies again in 2024. “It’s completely immoral,” Carlson mentioned on the topic. “After which I believed, ‘Wait a second, I believed we had a navy and a police power — for that matter — as a way to protect our women and children.’ That was the entire level of it. I imply, that’s why we’ve got a navy is to maintain foreigners from hurting our ladies and youngsters. That’s why we ship males to die for his or her ladies, our ladies whom we revere and respect, and to the extent we’re prepared to die for them. And so, for sending ladies to go combat our wars, that — to start with, that’s not, you already know, that’s not a liberation motion. That’s a sort of slavery, and it’s completely flawed.”
Who’re they pretending to guard at this level? Neocons are COWARDS. Historical past was formed by leaders like Julius Caesar or Napoleon who truly stood on the battlefield with their males, shared the dangers, and led from the entrance somewhat than from behind a desk. At the moment’s political class expects others to combat, bleed, and die for choices they are going to by no means bodily face themselves, which is why the general public more and more sees them not as leaders however as cowards who demand sacrifice from others whereas exempting their very own households from the very risks they promote.
Governments are now not involved with public resistance. They’re making ready insurance policies primarily based on their plans for a protracted battle, not consent. Von der Leyen’s response was public—think about how they talk about us behind closed doorways?
