Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Australian police say father-son duo allegedly behind Sydney mass shooting
    • Jimmy Lai supporters queue outside Hong Kong court ahead of verdict | Freedom of the Press News
    • CBB weekend winners, losers: An unexpected unbeaten emerges
    • Hollywood reacts to Bondi Beach mass shooting during Hanukkah event
    • Bondi Beach shooting: PM Wong expresses condolences, says Singapore condemns act of terrorism
    • World reacts to Jewish festival shooting attack at Sydney’s Bondi Beach | Crime News
    • Eagles finally know Lane Johnson’s potential return date
    • Letters to the Editor: Why ditching anonymity is a wise move for restaurant critics
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»Opinions»UC leaders need to treat antisemitism on campus more seriously
    Opinions

    UC leaders need to treat antisemitism on campus more seriously

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsAugust 22, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Aug. 22, 2025 7 AM PT

    To the editor: The Los Angeles Occasions (“UCLA’s Jewish community unites against Trump’s $1-billion demand: ‘Misguided and punitive,’” Aug. 1) failed to totally confront statements by UCLA school that minimized antisemitism. In actual fact, the Jewish Faculty Resilience Group (which I chair) and the Task Force on Antisemitism and Anti-Israeli Bias at UCLA have documented repeated and violent assaults on Jewish college students and school by pro-Palestinian protesters earlier than, throughout and after the 2024 encampment. Minimizing this actuality retraumatizes Jews on campus who’ve already endured hostile situations.

    Over the previous 18 months, JFRG has supplied UC leaders with evidence and a roadmap to deal with antisemitism. The true query is whether or not the college’s leaders, school and the media have studied this proof with the seriousness it deserves — or skimmed previous it, selecting the consolation of distance over the accountability of motion.

    Kira Stein, Los Angeles
    This author is an assistant medical professor on the David Geffen Faculty of Medication at UCLA and founder and chair of the Jewish School Resilience Group.

    ..

    To the editor: I can’t agree extra with the writers of this piece (“Trump’s claim of fighting antisemitism at UCLA is a dangerous charade,” Aug. 19). I’d identical to to emphasise and paraphrase a few its ideas: President Trump needs $1 billion from UCLA and if UCLA doesn’t discover a answer aside from the settlement, there can be devastating losses to analysis, jobs, and so on. Really a Faustian discount with robust traces of a mafia-style shakedown. And Trump says he’s doing this to fight antisemitism. This outrageous scheme can be laborious to imagine if it weren’t occurring earlier than our eyes.

    Nate Tucker, Costa Mesa

    ..

    To the editor: I don’t imagine for a minute that Trump goes after UCLA for the advantage of Jews and to combat antisemitism. He couldn’t care much less about us and is utilizing us to additional his trigger, no matter that be. He’s placing the Jewish individuals within the highlight for all of the fallacious causes, and is, in reality, inflicting extra antisemitism. Please, Trump, go away and depart us alone.

    Batiya Anna Lane, Palm Desert

    ..

    To the editor: The absurdity of the $1-billion tremendous Trump proposed for antisemitism at UCLA was proven by the 2 op-eds on one web page of The Occasions (“Black people on campuses support fighting antisemitism and also wonder, ‘What about us?,’” Aug. 19).

    Trump’s tremendous jogged my memory of Isaac Asimov’s warning that “when stupidity is taken into account patriotism, it’s unsafe to be clever.”

    Trump’s persevering with assaults on our universities, data and information are extraordinary risks to our democracy.

    Brian Federici, Riverside



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleAt least 4 people killed after tour bus traveling back from Niagara Falls crashes: Sources
    Next Article The ‘PGA Tour Champions’ quiz
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Opinions

    Letters to the Editor: Why ditching anonymity is a wise move for restaurant critics

    December 14, 2025
    Opinions

    Column: Australia just banned kids from social media. Shouldn’t we all?

    December 14, 2025
    Opinions

    Contributor: UC should go back to considering standardized tests in admissions

    December 14, 2025
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    Hamas says US ‘accomplice’ in Israel Qatar attack as funerals held

    September 11, 2025

    Trump threatens Russia with sanctions, tariffs until ceasefire, peace deal with Ukraine

    March 7, 2025

    Here’s what we know about Pope Leo XIV voting in US elections

    May 10, 2025
    Our Picks

    Australian police say father-son duo allegedly behind Sydney mass shooting

    December 14, 2025

    Jimmy Lai supporters queue outside Hong Kong court ahead of verdict | Freedom of the Press News

    December 14, 2025

    CBB weekend winners, losers: An unexpected unbeaten emerges

    December 14, 2025
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.