President Donald Trump’s administration has requested the Supreme Court docket’s permission to deport practically 200 Venezuelan migrants detained in Texas, asking the court docket to elevate the injunction it issued final month that quickly blocked the deportation of the migrants below the Alien Enemies Act.
In a submitting on Monday, the Trump administration stated that the 176 alleged members of Tren de Aragua “have confirmed to be particularly harmful to take care of in extended detention.”
In keeping with a sworn declaration, an official for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement stated {that a} group of 23 migrants “threatened to take hostages and injure facility contract workers and ICE officers.”
“The detainees did not adjust to orders to dismantle the barricades and have been barricaded within the housing unit for a number of hours,” stated Joshua Johnson, the ICE official.
Within the declaration, Johnson stated the group of migrants have been moved from Bluebonnet Detention Facility to Prairieland Detention Middle final week.
“Relocating the detainees to Prairieland was needed as a result of the organized and coordinated nature of the detainee misconduct threatened the safety, security, and order of the Bluebonnet facility and posed a threat to different detainees, workers, contractors, and any guests inside the facility,” Johnson stated.
Solicitor Common D. John Sauer testified throughout his Senate Judiciary Committee affirmation listening to on Feb. 26, 2025.
Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Name, Inc by way of Getty Imag
Within the submitting on Monday, Solicitor Common D. John Sauer stated that SCOTUS mustn’t block the removing of detainees “who’ve been endangering others whereas in detention.”
“One of many key causes the federal government has determined to make use of the extra expeditious procedures of the AEA to take away the putative class members within the first place is due to the hazards posed by TdA members whereas in detention,” Sauer stated within the submitting.
The solicitor normal additionally stated that the migrants have obtained “sufficient discover” and the chance to pursue habeas petitions.
“The three weeks afforded listed below are greater than sufficient to pursue habeas,” Sauer wrote. “But so far as the federal government is conscious, no members of the putative class who’ve obtained discover of removing pursuant to the AEA have filed habeas petitions within the Northern District of Texas whereas the executive injunction has remained in place.”
Sauer stated the court docket ought to modify its current non permanent block to “make clear” that the order solely bars removing of the category members below the AEA.
“The overwhelming majority of putative class members,” in keeping with Sauer, are eligible for “immediate” removing below Title 8 authorities.
“The issue of detaining the putative class members mentioned above has now made it crucial for the federal government to pursue removing below authorities aside from the AEA whereas the Court docket’s administrative injunction stays in place,” Sauer’s court docket submitting stated.