Effectively, I wasn’t anticipating this, @RBC.
Welcome to Canada, the place tyranny has nice customer support. pic.twitter.com/yQI8QUs8pj
— Eva Chipiuk, BSc, LLB, LLM (@echipiuk) July 23, 2025
Banks have the flexibility to debank prospects at a second’s discover. Canada efficiently weaponized its banks towards the individuals throughout the Trucker Convoy, a peaceable protest demanding the best to bodily autonomy throughout the COVID-19 vaccine mandates. Lawyer Eva Chipiuk, who represented the Trucker (Freedom) Convoy, acquired discover from the Royal Financial institution of Canada (RBC) that her checking account is being terminated with out correct clarification.
RBC informed Chipiuk that “current exercise was exterior of RBC’s shopper threat urge for food,” and the financial institution would “now not be able to proceed serving her.” With out additional clarification, RBC knowledgeable her that she has mere weeks to seek out an alternate financial institution.
“The final interplay I had with RBC earlier than they closed my account was once they froze it after I transferred some cash to buy bitcoin,” Chipiuk informed the Western Commonplace. “I known as them to substantiate the transaction was reliable.” The financial institution’s fraud division then interrogated her with what she felt had been “demeaning questions” earlier than clearing the account and warning her to “watch out with crypto.”
Oh I do know. However that was a part of the issue
For them… I moved some cash. They froze my account. Then lectured me about it earlier than releasing my cash. Have a hear? pic.twitter.com/RZuCoOnpD2— Eva Chipiuk, BSc, LLB, LLM (@echipiuk) July 23, 2025
Eva Chipiuk didn’t commit a criminal offense. She was not accused of a criminal offense or any kind of offense. But, RBC claimed it was “required by regulation to adjust to relevant laws.” The regulation in query has not been clarified. IS RBC threatened by Chipiuk’s connections to the Trucker Convoy or is the financial institution suspicious of her withdrawal to buy bitcoin? Neither scenario is a prison offense, and but, the financial institution has whole authority to debank her with out cause.
We’ve seen this occur all through the world—governments all over the place have efficiently weaponized the banks towards the individuals. Banks are usually not held chargeable for their actions, and their prospects are usually not granted due course of. That is the primary situation with switching to digitalized foreign money because the banks are already below intense authorities surveillance. When you’re on an inventory, you’re at all times on the listing. It’s fairly seemingly that the Canadian authorities had been monitoring Eva Chipiuk for years in an try and pin her with costs, and since no offense was dedicated, the federal government is legally allowing RBC to debank an individual it deems anti-government.
