The Enigma of April Idiot’s Day: Trump’s Hidden Struggle to Save the Republic – New from David Clements
The next is the most recent from former Professor and Legal professional David Clements.
See transcript beneath:
A SHADOW ENGULFS OUR REPUBLIC, its sacred vote plundered for over 20 years by traitors wielding rigged elections and a media unleashed to deceive by the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act of 2012, a legislation that freed government-funded propaganda to form American minds. As I’ve chronicled in “Mr. President, Look to Lincoln and Act” and “Antifa’s Fall,” President Donald Trump, guided by loyal navy advisors, could have crafted a grand sting in 2020 to unmask this betrayal.
A cryptic clue emerged on July 13, 2024, when Trump, surviving an murderer’s bullet in Butler, Pennsylvania, brandished an immigration chart with a startling observe: its backside proper nook claimed he “left workplace” on April 1, 2020. Did he sign a secret activation of Continuity of Authorities, a Chilly Struggle plan to protect governance amid disaster, hinting at a shadow struggle to reclaim America?
This query calls for solutions. Think about the timing. Days prior, the bioweapon referred to as COVID-19 was unleashed to close down America. Antifa’s road chaos through the “summer season of affection” formed their handler’s worry marketing campaign. Precursors to a stolen election. All instruments to hold out a mushy coup by globalist insiders—assume Obama’s intelligence operatives and Clinton’s hidden allies.
In 2025, troops march to Portland, Oregon, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) services to counter Antifa’s riots. New govt orders defend elections, and Venezuelan operatives are named as meddlers. If Continuity of Authorities was triggered in 2020, it might nullify objections from courts corrupted by traitors, holding Trump’s struggle throughout the Structure’s hallowed bounds.
As a former professor and prosecutor, I provide a civilian lens to hint this authorized path, mixing it with navy requirements to disclose how Trump—and allies like Home Speaker Mike Johnson, who calls himself a “wartime speaker”—might restore the Republic. Trump’s personal phrases, claiming huge presidential powers and a wartime mantle, underscore a commander-in-chief’s resolve in opposition to a fractured authorities.
And that’s the subject for right this moment.
The Enigma of April Idiot’s Day: Trump’s Hidden Struggle to Save the Republic
On July 13, 2025, as Trump defied dying in Butler, he pointed to an immigration chart declaring he “left workplace” on April 1, 2020—a date belied by his service till January 20, 2021. In our premise—elections rigged since 2000 by way of hacked machines and overseas ballots, media hiding treason—this observe sparks intrigue.
Continuity of Authorities is a categorised system, born within the Chilly Struggle to make sure governance survives crises like nuclear struggle or a coup. Guided by Presidential Coverage Directive 40 (PPD-40), it permits the President to relocate leaders to safe bunkers—like Cheyenne Mountain, Colorado—or switch energy to trusted officers if Washington falls. Did navy advisors, alerted by 2016’s spying on Trump’s marketing campaign (uncovered in 2025 by declassified intelligence studies), warn him that the COVID-19 bioweapon had two ends?
First, to set into movement the bioengineers’ depopulation agenda. Second, to create panic to undermine his presidency and form the circumstances to rig the 2020 election by means of machine subversion and mail-in ballots. Might Continuity of Authorities have been activated on April 1, 2020, to counter the insurgency, defend a sting operation, with Trump’s “departure” a coded sign of a shadow presidency?
This aligns with a sting: monitoring fraud by means of ballots or knowledge from the House Drive, a navy department created in 2019 to supervise house and cyber operations, probably utilizing Starlink, SpaceX’s satellite tv for pc community with early 2020 Protection Division contracts. The chart’s observe, a patriot’s sign, could recommend Trump devolved energy to these loyal to their oaths of workplace, retaining management over essential property—nuclear codes, safe bunkers—whereas captured civilian arms, like FBI Director Christopher Wray or Legal professional Basic Merrick Garland, turned the paperwork in opposition to the folks.
Trump’s personal rhetoric helps this. On September 30, 2025, at Marine Corps Base Quantico, addressing 800 generals and admirals, he proclaimed himself the “forty fifth, forty sixth, and forty seventh President,” emphasizing the forty sixth—Biden’s time period—as one he shuns credit score for because of its “disasters.” If Continuity of Authorities was lively, this suggests he held shadow authority over necessities throughout Biden’s tenure, a wartime fracture the place patriots guarded the Republic’s core in opposition to rogue parts.
Constructing the Case: A Civilian and Army Lens
As a former prosecutor, I do know investigations should be lawful to face up to scrutiny. Within the civilian justice system, we observe a transparent course of: beginning with cheap articulable suspicion (particular info suggesting wrongdoing, a low bar), escalating to possible trigger (sufficient proof for authorized motion like warrants), then clear and convincing proof (a robust case, typically for civil issues), and eventually past an affordable doubt (proof for legal convictions). That is how I might have constructed a case in opposition to election fraud or treason—betraying the nation to overseas powers, per Article III of the Structure. In 2016, suspicion arose when the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane, a probe into Trump’s marketing campaign, was unmasked in 2025 as a fabricated “Russia hoax” by Obama’s intelligence officers, with Clinton’s allies fueling the lie. This justified secret probes into treason or seditious conspiracy (plotting to overthrow the federal government, 18 U.S.C. § 2384).
By 2018, Govt Order 13848, a presidential directive ordering the Director of Nationwide Intelligence to analyze overseas election interference, constructed possible trigger. Declassified 2025 studies confirmed meddling, like Chinese language-funded faux ballots. The 2020 sting—monitoring fraud by way of House Drive or Starlink—gathered robust proof of a stolen election, with Antifa’s riots as a distraction. In 2025, declassification might ship simple proof for convictions.
Given the navy stakes—treason below a nationwide safety framework—the Uniform Code of Army Justice (UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 801–946) applies for tribunals. Army investigations begin with preliminary inquiries (like cheap suspicion) based mostly on credible info of crimes like Aiding the Enemy (Article 103b, UCMJ) or sedition (Article 94). Commanders’ investigations (akin to possible trigger) justify fees, resulting in courts-martial, requiring proof past an affordable doubt, as in civilian courts. In a Continuity of Authorities situation, navy tribunals might prosecute traitors if civilian courts are captured, bypassing corrupted judges. Trump’s sting, if below Continuity of Authorities, blended civilian evidence-building with navy rigor, making ready for tribunals.
Trump’s assertions of energy gas this path. On July 23, 2019, at a Washington, D.C., youth summit, he declared, “I’ve an Article II, the place I’ve the proper to do no matter I would like as president,” invoking the Structure’s govt authority. On March 18, 2020, amid COVID-19, he referred to as himself a “wartime president,” framing the disaster as a battle in opposition to an “invisible enemy.” Home Speaker Mike Johnson echoed this, calling himself a “wartime speaker” on April 16, 2024, and once more and February 24th and June 12th of 2025, citing the “consequential occasions” of his tenure amid political battles and nationwide unrest. Their rhetoric paints a fractured authorities—patriots like Trump and Johnson holding the road, whereas captured officers betray the folks. Trump delayed arrests in 2017, figuring out a deceived public, swayed by media lies, would reject them as tyranny, letting enemies overplay their hand whereas fact was stifled on Twitter, YouTube, and Google.
The Revolt Act: A Silent Strike?
The Revolt Act (10 U.S.C. §§ 251–255), an 1807 legislation, permits the President to deploy troops or federalize the Nationwide Guard to cease rebellions or lawlessness, like a rigged election threatening federal authority. On September 27, 2025, Trump despatched troops to Portland and ICE services, labeling Antifa—radical activists tied to 2020’s chaos—“home terrorists” attacking federal websites. Oregon’s leaders, probably complicit, sued, claiming the transfer was illegal.
So, here’s a query to ponder. Does the Revolt Act require Trump to announce its use, alerting traitors or a misled public?
In a phrase, no.
Part 254 requires solely a public proclamation after invocation, ordering rebels to “disperse,” as President Bush did in 1992 for Los Angeles riots. No legislation calls for prior discover to enemies or Congress. One might argue Trump already supplied discover to disperse. On January 20, 2025, President Trump issued a Presidential Proclamation (”Guaranteeing the States Safety In opposition to Invasion”), which aligns with § 254 by ordering dispersal of these contributing to the border disaster, successfully satisfying this requirement earlier than navy deployments have been made.
The proclamation is a prerequisite solely when the Revolt Act is explicitly invoked. Nevertheless, below Continuity of Authorities, a secret order—maybe a Presidential Emergency Motion Doc (PEAD), a categorised disaster plan—might have invoked the Act on April Idiot’s Day 2020, with troops deployed domestically (this yr) as its echo.
This may bypass the Posse Comitatus Act (18 U.S.C. § 1385), which bars navy use in home policing except exceptions just like the Revolt Act apply. If Continuity of Authorities was lively, complaints from captured courts, like Oregon’s, can be powerless. Authority, even when devolved, would override tainted rulings.
The Lacking Orders: A Path of Shadows
Trump’s govt orders, directives with the drive of legislation, reveal gaps. From 2017 to 2021, he issued 220 orders, none naming the Revolt Act. EO 13848 (2018) set traps, ordering probes into election fraud, with 2025 leaks confirming Venezuelan, Serbian, and Chinese language meddling. In 2025, 205 orders have been issued (numbered 14147 to 14351) together with a January border safety order to repel the invasion, and an order focusing on Venezuelan narco-terrorists, which coincidentally includes election interference. But no order invokes the Act. I consider the silence is deliberate: a sting thrives in secrecy, avoiding media cries of “dictator.” The April 1st chart hints at hidden orders, probably tying Continuity of Authorities to House Drive’s cyber monitoring or Starlink’s safe knowledge, preserving proof of the coup.
Awakening the Folks
The general public, lulled by media lies claiming elections are “safe,” is the ultimate battleground. Trump’s declassification energy, rooted in Article II, can reveal sting proof: tracked ballots, hacked programs, Venezuelan plots. The DNI, now led by patriots in 2025, might unveil this, as latest leaks uncovered 2016’s spying. X, nonetheless shadow banning many, at the least seems to be freer from company gatekeepers, and spreading fact is a better prospect than in 2020. If corrupted courts block, as in 2020’s 60+ failed lawsuits, Continuity of Authorities’s framework—shifting energy to loyalists—prevails. The Structure’s 14th Modification might bar traitorous officers, or a Home vote, led by a “wartime speaker” like Johnson, might restore governance.
The Path Forward
The chart’s riddle—April 1, 2020—could sign Continuity of Authorities’s activation, a defend for a sting to show a bioweapon and stolen election. Trump’s Quantico declare because the “forty sixth President” suggests he held shadow management, with Johnson’s “wartime” resolve as his legislative ally. In 2025, troops in Portland, orders in opposition to Venezuela, and Antifa’s defeat are its ripples. The Revolt Act, if secretly invoked, awaits its proclamation when traitors are cornered. Article II, Continuity of Authorities, and declassification type a authorized trinity to slay the coup.
I provide one last thought to your consideration, although its anecdotal.
On August 13, 2021, I met Trump instantly after presenting at Mike Lindell’s Cyber Symposium, a chaotic occasion rife with spies, truth-tellers, misinformation, infiltrators, and honeypots. The occasion was of venture for all concerned. I firmly consider the symposium turned a entice to ensnare and destroy the election integrity motion at its inception. However for the miraculous emergence of whistleblower Tina Peters, offering unassailable proof of election subversion in Mesa County, and a tough pivot away from PCAPs tied to Dennis Montgomery, a spook and con man of the best order, the entice would have succeeded.
Trump appeared genuinely shocked once I arrived, as he had simply completed watching my presentation on tv. Our 30-minute assembly started with Trump going by means of the motions lamenting 2020’s unfairness. He didn’t must re-air his grievances, definitely not with a no person like me. I think Trump was weighing me in a steadiness. I had heard he possessed a radar that noticed by means of folks in seconds. By no means taking his eyes off me, he spoke whereas I listened, studying my reactions like a e-book.
He would finally flip to me and ask, “What will we do?”
How would you reply to such a query? Solely a idiot would open his mouth and delude himself into considering he had a solution to fulfill essentially the most highly effective man on the planet.
Now perceive, I don’t assume for a second, Trump was counting on me for a solution. He already had the solutions. I consider he was merely adjusting his scale, fine-tuning his weighing and measuring of yours really. My invitation could have served as nothing greater than a curiosity. A legislation professor backing his claims made me a unicorn, a novelty.
With no try and impress the President, I merely advised him the issue was not the black letter legislation discovered within the lawsuits filed by his legal professionals. That I might file a lawsuit with 10 extra months’ price of proof of fraud, and the case can be dismissed twice as quick. That the actual drawback was the existential menace Trump posed to his enemies, which included a captured judiciary.
I advised him that the judiciary was “cancer-ridden,” a barrier to justice.
He challenged my assertion. “All of it? Are you positive?”
Now that he posed the query, I paused. Was I positive? How might I be?
I’ve reexamined our dialog in my head a thousand occasions.
I consider in that second he was providing a refined clue that I shouldn’t be so sure. And thru hindsight, maybe a unique kind of court docket was already at work. I hope I’ll study the reply to this query at some point.
In direction of the tip of our assembly, I sought a solution from him to ease the burden of all of it. Be mindful, my loyalty to this man’s workplace, would go on to value me all the pieces. I might lose my profession the next week. I might lose my status within the press the next yr, slandered and destroyed. I might be focused by the IRS, subjected to dying threats, and bodily assaults. I wanted one thing to maintain the religion.
So, I spoke up and mentioned, “As you sit there, you’re the commander-in-chief, by advantage of our authorized votes. Probably the most highly effective man on the planet, it doesn’t matter what makes an attempt the imposter Biden made to steal the election. Which means no disrespect to Mike Lindell, there isn’t any manner the destiny of the Republic is within the palms of the MyPillow man. That he has knowledge that you simply don’t.”
In spite of everything, I used to be staring on the man that created House Drive.
He didn’t reply. He simply gave me an appraising look.
I concluded by saying one thing alongside the traces of, “Mr. President, I don’t see a path within the (civilian) courts of legislation. So, I’ll do all the pieces in my energy to alter hearts and minds within the court docket of public opinion. I belief that you’ve got a plan. And when the time is correct, I consider the American folks will meet you within the center.”
Once more, Trump didn’t reply, giving nothing away. He merely nodded his head and requested, “Would you thoughts if I be a part of you for dinner?’
Take what you’ll from this text. I might go on to sit down at a dinner desk with the best man I had ever met for almost three hours.
I’ve by no means spoken with the President since. I don’t know if that was as a result of my advocacy, whereas over the goal, might doubtlessly battle with plans set into movement a decade in the past. Or that being learn into his internal circle was too large a threat. In spite of everything, as a civilian professor, I got here out of nowhere. Maybe, I didn’t make an impression on him in any respect, and reminiscence of our assembly would fade alongside his numerous different conferences held with far more necessary males.
I simply know that I treasure that reminiscence. I obtained to sit down on the equal of the King’s desk. I left with {a photograph}. Impressed by his genius, and much more impressed by his kindness to these round him. Busboys, waitresses, have been all handled with dignity.
