Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • IEEE Spectrum’s Top Computing Stories of 2025
    • Australian man charged over post allegedly backing Bondi attack
    • Palestinian actor and filmmaker Mohammad Bakri dies at 72 | Gaza News
    • What Alabama can take away from epic CFP win over Oklahoma
    • Too much taxpayer money is going to attorneys in abuse settlements
    • Boxer Jake Paul talks future plans, ‘baby fever’ after suffering jaw injury
    • Pope Leo urges Russia, Ukraine dialogue in Christmas blessing
    • Turkiye arrests 115 ISIL suspects it says planned holiday attacks | ISIL/ISIS News
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»US News»Supreme Court declines to hear dispute over Montana abortion consent law
    US News

    Supreme Court declines to hear dispute over Montana abortion consent law

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsJuly 3, 2025No Comments1 Min Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    The Supreme Court docket on Thursday declined to take up a dispute over a Montana legislation that might have required notarized parental consent for a minor to obtain an abortion.

    State lawmakers have argued that oldsters have a constitutional proper to make selections regarding the care, custody and management of their youngsters.

    Deliberate Parenthood of Montana, in difficult the legislation, argued that minors have a constitutional proper to privateness that can’t be infringed.

    A normal view of the U.S. Supreme Court docket constructing in Washington, June 1, 2024.

    Will Dunham/Reuters

    The Montana Supreme Court docket struck down the legislation on state constitutional grounds. The U.S. Supreme Court docket now leaves that call in place.

    Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch stated they agreed with the Supreme Court docket’s determination to not hear the case, saying it “gives a poor car” for addressing the constitutional query concerning the rights of oldsters, which they prompt they’re open to resolving in a future case.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleWho is Rachel Reeves’ sister? Meet Labour MP Ellie Reeves
    Next Article Vaccines save millions of lives. Don’t let RFK Jr. diminish them
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    US News

    Boxer Jake Paul talks future plans, ‘baby fever’ after suffering jaw injury

    December 25, 2025
    US News

    Major winter storm predicted to bring snow, ice to Midwest and Northeast

    December 25, 2025
    US News

    Rescue mission helicopter crashes on Mount Kilimanjaro, killing all 5 on board

    December 25, 2025
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    Brian Snitker’s job ‘safe’ with Braves, but what about 2026?

    June 9, 2025

    World Cancer Day 2025: key signs and symptoms you shouldn’t ignore

    February 4, 2025

    The firms looking to destroy harmful ‘forever chemicals’

    August 19, 2025
    Our Picks

    IEEE Spectrum’s Top Computing Stories of 2025

    December 25, 2025

    Australian man charged over post allegedly backing Bondi attack

    December 25, 2025

    Palestinian actor and filmmaker Mohammad Bakri dies at 72 | Gaza News

    December 25, 2025
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.