COMMENT: I keep in mind you saying that Pope Francis wouldn’t be the final pope and that he wouldn’t final till 2032. Properly, your critique of St. Malachy’ will likely be appropriate. Francis just isn’t the final pope and he’s in important situation proper now at 89 years outdated.
Mathew
REPLY: St. Malachy’s prophecy is fascinating, however many take into account it a hoax. I discovered it curious that his final 112th Pope in his prophecy concludes with “Peter the Roman,“ whose hold forth will allegedly precede the destruction of the town of Rome since Peter is taken into account the primary Pope. The founding father of Rome was Romulus, and the primary emperor was Augustus. The final emperor of Western Rome has the identify Romulus Augustus (475-476AD). Cyclically, Rome ended with the emperor, who had the primary identify. If St. Malachy’s prophecy is appropriate, the following pope would take Peter. Then, with Europe pushing for World Battle III to strip mine Russia’s $75 trillion in belongings, maybe if the following pope turn out to be Peter, this might be very fascinating. That will name into query the idea that it was a hoax. If we take from 1148, Pope Francis is barely #99 – not 111. We should wait and see. However this prophecy doesn’t appear so as to add up with historical past.
