The robots that share our public areas as we speak are so demure. Social robots and service robots goal to keep away from offense, erring towards well mannered airs, constructive feelings, and obedience. In some methods, this is sensible—would you actually wish to have a yelling match with a delivery robot in a lodge? In all probability not, even in case you’re in New York City and attempting to soak up the native tradition.
In different methods, this passive social robot design aligns with paternalistic requirements that hyperlink help to subservience. Thoughtlessly following such outdated social norms in robotic design could also be ill-advised, because it can help to reinforce outdated or harmful ideas comparable to limiting folks’s rights and reflecting solely the wants of majority-identity customers.
In my robotics lab at Oregon State University, we work with a playful spirit and revel in difficult the problematic norms which might be entrenched inside “well mannered” interactions and social roles. So we determined to experiment with robots that use foul language round people. In any case, many individuals are utilizing foul language greater than ever in 2025. Why not let robots have an opportunity, too?
Why and Methods to Research Cursing Robots
Societal requirements within the United States recommend that cursing robots would seemingly rub folks the incorrect manner in most contexts, as swearing has a predominantly unfavorable connotation. Though some previous analysis reveals that cursing can enhance team cohesion and elicit humor, sure members of society (comparable to girls) are sometimes anticipated to avoid risking offense via profanity. We puzzled whether or not cursing robots can be considered negatively, or if they could maybe supply advantages in sure conditions.
We determined to review cursing robots within the context of responding to errors. Previous work in human-robot interplay has already proven that responding to error (relatively than ignoring it) might help robots be perceived extra positively in human-populated areas, particularly within the case of private and repair robots. And one study discovered that in comparison with different fake pas, foul language is extra forgivable in a robotic.
With this previous work in thoughts, we generated movies with three frequent sorts of robotic failure: bumping right into a desk, dropping an object, and failing to understand an object. We crossed these conditions with three sorts of responses from the robotic: no verbal response, a non-expletive verbal declaration, and an expletive verbal declaration. We then requested folks to fee the robots on issues like competence, discomfort, and likability, utilizing customary scales in an internet survey.
What If Robots Cursed? These Movies Helped Us Study How Folks Really feel about Profane RobotsVideo: Naomi Fitter
What Folks Considered Our Cursing Robots
On the entire, we have been stunned by how acceptable swearing appeared to the research contributors, particularly inside an preliminary group of Oregon State College college students, however even among the many normal public as effectively. Cursing had no unfavorable influence, and even some constructive impacts, among the many school college students after we eliminated one religiously connotated curse (god***it), which gave the impression to be obtained in a stronger unfavorable manner than different cuss phrases.
The truth is, college contributors rated swearing robots because the most socially close and most humorous, and rated non-expletive and expletive robotic reactions equal on social heat, competence, discomfort, anthropomorphism, and likability scales. Most people judged non-profane and profane robots as equal on most scales, though expletive reactions have been deemed most discomforting and non-expletive responses appeared most likable. We consider that the college college students have been barely extra accepting of cursing robots due to the campus’s progressive tradition, the place cursing is taken into account a peccadillo.
Since experiments run solely in an internet setting don’t all the time signify real-life interactions effectively, we additionally carried out a closing replication research in particular person with a robotic that made errors whereas distributing goodie baggage to campus group members at Oregon State, which bolstered our prior outcomes.
People React to a Cursing Robotic within the WildVideo: Naomi Fitter
We have submitted this work, which represents a well-designed series of empirical experiments with interesting results and replications along the way, to several different journals and conferences. Despite consistently enthusiastic reviewer comments, no editors have yet accepted our work for publication—it seems to be the type of paper that editors are nervous to touch. Currently, the work is under review for a fourth time, for possible inclusion in the 2025 IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), in a paper titled “Oh F**k! How Do People Feel About Robots That Leverage Profanity?”
Give Cursing Robots a Probability
Primarily based on our outcomes, we predict cursing robots deserve an opportunity! Our findings present that swearing robots would sometimes have little draw back and a few upside, particularly in open-minded areas comparable to college campuses. Even for most of the people, reactions to errors with profanity yielded a lot much less distaste than we anticipated. Our information confirmed that individuals cared extra about whether or not robots acknowledged their error in any respect than whether or not or not they swore.
Folks do have some reservations about cursing robots, particularly in terms of consolation and likability, so thoughtfulness could also be required to use curse phrases on the proper time. For instance, simply as people do, robots ought to seemingly maintain again their swear phrases round youngsters and be extra cautious in settings that sometimes demand cleaner language. Robotic practitioners may additionally take into account surveying particular person customers about profanity acceptance as they arrange new know-how in private settings—relatively than letting robotic programs study the onerous manner, maybe alienating customers within the course of.
As extra robots enter our day-to-day areas, they’re sure to make errors. How they react to those errors is vital. Basically, our work reveals that individuals want robots that discover when a mistake has occurred and react to this error in a relatable manner. And plainly a spread of types within the response itself, from the profane to the mundane, can work effectively. So we invite designers to offer cursing robots an opportunity!
From Your Web site Articles
Associated Articles Across the Internet
