Town of Philadelphia filed a federal lawsuit on Thursday towards the Trump administration over the National Parks Service’s removal of the slavery memorial on the President’s Home within the metropolis — an exhibit that honored the lives of the 9 folks enslaved there by George Washington.
The grievance, which was filed within the U.S. District Court docket for the Jap District of Pennsylvania, towards the Nationwide Parks Service (NPS) and the U.S. Division of Inside, which oversees NPS. The lawsuit additionally names Inside Sec. Doug Burgum and NPS Performing Director Jessica Bowron.
Town argues that by eradicating the panels telling the tales of the enslaved folks “with out discover,” NPS violated numerous congressional legal guidelines, in addition to a 2006 settlement NPS made with town and laid out the phrases for constructing the exhibit, which opened to the general public in 2010.
Nationwide Park Service staffers are pictured eradicating panels which might be park of the “Freedom and Slavery within the Making of a New Nation” exhibit on the President’s Home in Philadelphia.
WPVI
“Defendants violated the agreements with the Metropolis and haven’t offered any rationale for his or her abrupt change in course, rendering their actions arbitrary and capricious and never in accordance with regulation,” the grievance alleges.
The lawsuit argues that as a result of town of Philadelphia had an “equal proper” below the 2006 settlement to “approve the ultimate design” of the President’s Home Mission, town also needs to have the authority to evaluation and approve any adjustments to the exhibit.
“The Metropolis’s proper to approve the exhibit’s remaining design, together with the interpretive shows, can be meaningless if the NPS may at any time later change or take away the shows with out the Metropolis’s approval,” the lawsuit states.
A spokesperson for the Division of the Inside instructed ABC Information in an announcement on Friday that the elimination of the slavery exhibit is a transfer that complies with President Donald Trump’s March 27, 2025 government order, “Restoring Reality and Sanity to American Historical past,” which directed the Inside Division to remove “divisive, race-centered ideology” and narratives from federal cultural establishments.
“All federal businesses are to evaluation interpretive supplies to make sure accuracy, honesty, and alignment with shared nationwide values. Following completion of the required evaluation, the Nationwide Park Service is now taking acceptable motion in accordance with the [Executive] Order,” the division spokesperson mentioned.
The spokesperson additionally criticized town’s insurance policies and its submitting of “frivolous lawsuits within the hopes of demeaning our courageous Founding Fathers who set the good street map for the best nation on this planet — the US of America.”

President’s Home Web site, Memorial Wall. The names of the 9 enslaved members of President Washington’s family who lived at this web site.
NPS
The grievance alleges that by eradicating the panels, NPS and the Inside Division violated the Administrative Process Act (APA) of 1946, which requires federal businesses to publish proposals and supply alternatives for public remark concerning company actions.
Philadelphia Mayor Cherelle Parker addressed the lawsuit throughout a Friday press convention, the place she was requested by a reporter to reply to the exhibit’s elimination.
“Let me affirm for the residents of town of Philadelphia that there’s a cooperative settlement between town and the federal authorities that dates again to 2006. That settlement requires events to fulfill and confer if there are to be any adjustments made to an exhibit,” Parker mentioned, including that her workplace will preserve the general public posted as authorized motion strikes ahead.
ABC Information reached out to Parker’s workplace for additional remark.
Via the lawsuit, town of Philadelphia seeks a courtroom order restoring the slavery memorial, a preliminary injunction to dam different potential adjustments to the President’s Home and a everlasting injunction blocking additional adjustments to the exhibit.
