This text initially appeared on vigilantfox.com and was republished with permission.
Karoline Leavitt was simply flooded with questions concerning the so-called Epstein “HOAX.”
Reporters didn’t go simple on her.
One requested why the DOJ continues to be holding the information as an alternative of releasing a redacted model.
Her responses at this time solely raised extra eyebrows.
Ask People how they really feel concerning the dealing with of the Epstein information, and also you’ll hear the identical reply from each side of the aisle: whole frustration.
In response to a latest ballot, simply 3% of People say they’re glad with how the Trump administration has dealt with it.
In the meantime, half the nation is dissatisfied and believes the administration hasn’t been clear.
People are livid as a result of on February twenty first, Pam Bondi informed the world the Epstein consumer listing was “sitting on [her] desk proper now to overview,” explaining it was a part of a directive ordered by President Trump.
However on July 7, the Trump Justice Division concluded by way of inner memo that Epstein truly had no consumer listing, didn’t blackmail anybody, and undoubtedly killed himself.
This strolling again of earlier claims has unleashed a frenzy.
Trump isn’t making the state of affairs any higher, although.
Yesterday, the president doubled down once more, calling the Epstein Recordsdata a “hoax”, accusing Democrats of “planting” disinformation within the paperwork through the 4 years they managed the Justice Division.
He says his Justice Division will launch what is taken into account “credible” data, and no extra.
The primary spherical of Epstein questioning at this time got here from Fox Information reporter Jacqui Heinrich, who grilled Karoline Leavitt on President Trump’s latest declare that the Epstein information are a “hoax.”
“There’s been lots of dialogue concerning the Epstein information and the president’s feedback yesterday calling it a hoax. Are you able to make clear which half is the hoax?” Heinrich requested.
Leavitt stood by the president, saying, “The president is referring to the truth that Democrats are all of the sudden pretending they ever cared about transparency relating to Jeffrey Epstein, which is an asinine suggestion.”
“They’d management of the White Home and Congress and did nothing to show Epstein or his community,” she added.
Leavitt went on to defend Trump’s dealing with of the case, saying, “It was President Trump who ordered the DOJ and Legal professional Common to conduct a full overview of the Epstein information, and so they did.”
She emphasised that the folks answerable for the overview (Pam Bondi, Dan Bongino, and Kash Patel) have been chosen for a motive. “A few of the most trusted voices in our motion. That’s why the president appointed them,” she mentioned.
“They spent months combing by means of the fabric and concluded what was printed in that memo.”
Leavitt insisted President Trump “has been clear” on Epstein and “adopted by means of [on] his guarantees to the American folks.”
She accused Democrats and the media of exaggerating the difficulty to distract from Trump’s latest accomplishments, saying they’re pretending “it’s the largest or the American folks care about.”
Leavitt then highlighted a number of of Trump’s achievements, she mentioned, have been ignored by the press, equivalent to securing $90 billion in investments for Pennsylvania, assembly with the King of Bahrain to convey overseas funding to the U.S., and signing a bipartisan invoice to fight fentanyl deaths after assembly with households who misplaced kids to the disaster.
“These are the problems the president cares about,” and “these are the problems this president goes to stay targeted on,” Leavitt mentioned.
One reporter requested Leavitt if Trump can be appointing a particular prosecutor within the Epstein case.
Leavitt’s response? A tough NO.
REPORTER: “The president has mentioned he floated the thought of a particular prosecutor within the Epstein case. Are you able to affirm that, and has he requested the Legal professional Common to do that—to nominate a particular prosecutor to look it over?”
LEAVITT: “Properly, the thought was floated from somebody within the media to the president. The president wouldn’t advocate a particular prosecutor within the Epstein case. That’s how he feels. And as for his discussions with the Legal professional Common, I’m undecided.”
Then got here the pointed query everybody needs to know.
Fox Information reporter Jacqui Heinrich requested why the Justice Division doesn’t merely launch what they know, redact the delicate components, and let the American folks resolve what to make of the Epstein story.
Leavitt’s response? A traditional deflection.
She mentioned these choices relaxation with the Justice Division, not the White Home.
Primarily, “Don’t ask me.”
One reporter jumped in, questioning why President Trump fired Maurene Comey, former FBI Director James Comey’s daughter, who served because the lead prosecutor in each the Ghislaine Maxwell and Diddy instances.
Leavitt rapidly corrected the declare, saying it was the DOJ—not the president—who made that decision.
Leavitt closed with a agency message aimed toward Trump supporters who’re starting to lose religion within the president after the Epstein fallout:
“This president is a superb president as a result of he listens. He takes in each perspective. However in the end, he’s led this nation to historic success—not simply previously six months, however all through his first 4 years because the founding father of the MAGA motion. He’s led by means of perilous instances with intuition and energy. And as I all the time say, the American folks ought to belief in President Trump.”
If that is “transparency” and there’s nothing to cover, why does it nonetheless really feel like they’re hiding all the pieces?
The story went from the consumer listing being “on [Pam Bondi’s] desk” to “there is no such thing as a consumer listing,” and the entire thing is a “hoax.”
How do you are feeling about all this? I wish to hear the place you stand.
Discover extra tales like this at VigilantFox.com
