Unlock the White Home Watch e-newsletter free of charge
Your information to what the 2024 US election means for Washington and the world
The author is a contributing columnist, based mostly in Chicago
Steve Pitstick has been farming within the US Midwest for 51 years, about an hour outdoors Chicago, town that grain constructed. Seven generations of his household have made their residing off the land.
Now farms like his in Illinois — the largest soyabean-exporting state within the US — are on the tough finish of President Donald Trump’s US-China commerce struggle. Illinois paid an enormous worth for Trump’s last trade war with China in 2018. Again then, the US lost $27bn in agricultural exports in 2018-19 alone, with losses concentrated within the Midwest. Illinois alone misplaced $1.41bn annualised.
I caught up with Pitstick as he was dashing to get this yr’s soyabean and corn crops into the bottom on his son’s farm close to Elburn, Illinois. Speaking quick in order that he might get again to transferring bins of seed across the farm with a forklift, the 66-year-old tells me he’s not fretting in regards to the current dramatic deterioration in commerce relations with China, the top export destination for US soyabeans. And neither is the market, he says. “Thus far the [soyabean futures] market has confirmed that it doesn’t care . . . it has truly rallied because the tariffs began,” he tells me. “It should all work out ultimately.”
Farmers are sometimes sanguine however that is greater than mere optimism. “I firmly consider we’re heading in the right direction [with tariffs],” Pitstick tells me, gesturing to close by railway tracks that he says carry “container after container of junk” that US shoppers purchase, largely from China. “We have to ship one thing out of this nation to steadiness out that commerce, proper?” That, he says, is what Trump is attempting to do.
However doesn’t he blame the final commerce struggle for dramatically boosting Brazil’s soy exports to China — on the expense of farms like his? Pitstick factors out, rightly, that the rise of Brazil as an agricultural exporter began nicely earlier than Trump was elected; he thinks it would proceed with or with out tariffs. “We’re in uncharted territory — however then we’re at all times in uncharted territory,” he says, recalling that American agriculture has survived worse, pointing to President Jimmy Carter’s 1980 US grain embargo towards the Soviet Union.
Many Illinois farmers I interviewed final week — to not point out the futures market — appear to suppose there can be a commerce cope with China earlier than the crop they’re planting now could be harvested. However some are much less sanguine than Pitstick. “The final time tariffs hit, each third row of soyabeans [in the US] was going to China, and in the present day it’s just one out of each 4,” Invoice Wykes, former chair of the Illinois Soybean Affiliation, tells me. “It’s sort of scary.”
Ron Kindred, the present chair, echoes his issues: “We perceive what the president is attempting to perform however is that this the easiest way to do it? He’s attempting to stage the taking part in area for us and that may be an excellent factor however we will’t endure an entire lot of ache proper now as a result of the worth of our commodities has gone down considerably previously two years.

“Now we have $10 soyabeans proper now . . . however will we now have $7 soyabeans subsequent yr? That’s not one thing we will stay with,” he tells me. Agricultural economists anticipate Illinois corn and soyabean farmers to lose cash this year.
True, the Trump administration has promised assist for US farmers caught within the commerce struggle, after spending closely to bail them out last time. However Kindred says most farmers — who vote heavily Republican — aren’t comfy with authorities handouts and like to work for what they earn. Even worse, the commerce struggle is destroying the US status as a dependable buying and selling accomplice, he tells me.
Present China tariffs make US soyabeans uncompetitive: the US Soybean Affiliation estimates duties, tariffs and value-added taxes in China now whole almost 150 per cent, “so if you happen to ship a bushel of beans to China that value $10 right here, it’s going to value $25 there plus delivery prices”.
If that persists, will it harm Trump’s substantial help amongst farmers? Pitstick says he isn’t turning towards the president anytime quickly. And a current CBS News poll confirmed 91 per cent of Republicans stay satisfied he has a transparent plan on commerce.
“If China doesn’t purchase our stuff, any person else will,” Illinois farmer John Andermann tells me. For now, the state’s farmers stay centered on getting seeds within the floor. In Trump’s America, something might occur earlier than harvest time.