To the editor: Gov. Gavin Newsom has gotten front-page headlines with irrelevant gestures on easing regulations to rebuild in fire-stricken areas.
The California Environmental High quality Act, or CEQA, usually doesn’t apply to single-family houses, not to mention rebuilds. Moreover, as your article confirms, rebuilds of most single-family houses are additionally exempt from coastal growth permits.
As we discovered in Santa Barbara after the Paint fireplace in 1990, when the county shortly moved to exempt rebuilds from the planning course of, most individuals of means didn’t need to rebuild what that they had earlier than however had been prepared to attend for one thing “larger” and higher. One can count on that the house owners of seaside homes in Malibu will “need” what residents of extra modest, numerous areas in Altadena in reality do want.
Worse, the applying of those “exemptions” in Malibu will doubtless trash the state’s efforts to handle sea-level rise in new building.
Two years in the past, Newsom vetoed Meeting Invoice 1078, which might have established a revolving mortgage fund to permit native jurisdictions to buy susceptible coastal properties affected by local weather change. Insurance coverage firms will now pay out billions on those self same coastal properties and depart the remainder of us, coastal residents or not, with out protection.
Now could be a very good time for the state to take steps to buy or condemn what’s left of the vacant land beneath the ruins at its present “worth” as a growing public seaside.
Jana Zimmer, Santa Barbara
The author, a member of the California Coastal Fee from 2011-15, is creator of the e book, “Navigating the California Coastal Act.”
..
To the editor: I’ve a favor to ask our governor: Please assist me persuade my buddies to not flee our state. Already fed up with homelessness and residential costs, they view these fires as the ultimate nail within the California coffin.
I attempt to inform them we’ve a possibility to astound the remainder of the nation with how swiftly and ingeniously we are able to rise from the ashes. World-class creativity and technological innovation flourish right here as nowhere else and can assist us reimagine and rebuild flame- and quake-resistant communities.
Good luck with that, they snicker. After which they level to our notoriously clumsy, overly regulated bureaucratic apparatuses to conclude that we are going to fail.
I implore the governor to declare the present second a clarion name to completely revolutionize and expedite the way in which we get issues completed. He should rise above politics and use this second to really recapture the power and spirit that made California what it’s — or was.
Jordan Sollitto, San Marino
..
To the editor: I don’t assist shortcutting the regulatory course of for rebuilding.
We really need a brand new set of rules for constructing on this area. We want new constructing codes. We have to panorama another way.
Letting folks construct based on our present codes is only a recipe for repeated catastrophe.
This may decelerate the rebuilding, however it is going to make it a lot better in the long term. Our city planners must give you constructing codes applicable for our altering local weather.
Mona Subject, Eagle Rock
..
To the editor: I listened to Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass discuss chopping purple tape for the rebuilding effort. Individuals who have misplaced houses and companies are inundated with issues, so this, if it occurs, will make it a bit simpler to rebuild.
However that raises a query: Why are there so many regulatory hurdles to constructing within the first place? If there’s regulatory aid on the native stage for individuals who have misplaced a lot within the fires, why can’t pointless, cumbersome allowing merely be scuttled for good?
Alice Lillie, Pomona
