President Donald Trump dismissed David Huitema from his position as director of the U.S. Workplace of Authorities Ethics (OGE) on Monday.
OGE is answerable for overseeing the chief department’s ethics applications, together with efforts to “forestall monetary conflicts.” Huitema was nominated by former President Joe Biden and was sworn within the weeks after Trump’s victory within the 2024 election.
David Huitema, the previous head of the Workplace of Authorities Ethics, discusses his dismissal from the position. Let me know when you want something.
ABC Information
ABC Information’ Linsey Davis spoke with Huitema about his sudden elimination from the job on Wednesday.
ABC NEWS: Tonight, a bunch of eight now former authorities watchdogs fired by President Trump have filed a lawsuit challenging their terminations. They embody inspector generals on the Division of Protection, Veteran Affairs, training and extra.
Individually Monday, President Trump fired the director of the Workplace of Authorities Ethics, the official tasked with guaranteeing authorities staff adjust to battle of curiosity and ethics necessities.
David Huitema was confirmed by the Senate in December for a 5-year time period and simply two months into that time period, two days in the past, he was terminated. He joins us now tonight.
Thanks a lot in your time, Mr. Huitema. So, the workplace you labored in is an unbiased company that was working to stop conflicts of curiosity in authorities. Have these guardrails now merely been eliminated?
HUITEMA: Properly, I do know that there are dedicated public servants nonetheless on the Workplace of Authorities Ethics and ethics officers all through the chief department who’re dedicated to their work and dedicated to upholding these values of integrity.
However actually these guardrails have been weakened. There’s a actual change in imaginative and prescient; I might say, from having organizations — just like the inspectors basic, the Workplace of Particular Counsel, the Workplace of Authorities Ethics — which have an air of independence and authority and stature to talk with out an agenda, you understand, play it straight and slim and uphold integrity, uphold the rule of regulation and and uphold accountability in authorities.
ABC NEWS: So ought to the American public be assured govt department nominees will not be violating ethics guidelines and are complying with the regulation?
HUITEMA: Properly, we’ll must see. , it is attention-grabbing — I used to be caught abruptly, clearly, by my termination. And my largest feeling is one in every of disappointment. I had signed up for a five-year dedication and I used to be dedicated to seeing that by.
And I knew that that meant working throughout a number of administrations and I used to be prepared to serve in good religion any administration, together with this one. And we would really gotten off to a great begin.
The vetting of nominees for cupboard positions, for instance, has occurred in mainly the identical approach it is occurred previously. And we had been capable of do these, end them up at a quicker price than ever earlier than.

Elon Musk listens to President Donald Trump converse within the Oval Workplace of the White Home in Washington, D.C., Feb. 11, 2025.
Kevin Lamarque/Reuters
However we’re getting into a brand new section now, proper? As officers really come into their positions and are taking actions as authorities staff, now’s once we’re getting into that point interval the place actual substantive considerations about ethics and integrity can come up.
And my sense is that the president simply would not need an Workplace of Authorities Ethics that is empowered to take these points critically and converse to them.
ABC NEWS: Are you involved about Elon Musk’s doable battle of curiosity as he takes an unprecedented position in authorities oversight?
HUITEMA: Properly, I do not need to converse to any specific people. And, you understand, a part of the problem with Elon Musk and the DOGE [Department of Government Efficiency] effort, proper, is we do not actually know precisely what he is doing. So, I am not aware about any particulars and do not have something to share in that regard.
But it surely’s an ideal instance of what a problem it may be for individuals from the non-public sector with in depth investments and monetary pursuits to come back into authorities and alter to the change in expectations, the change in guidelines that apply.
ABC NEWS: I suppose it appears like an apparent query, however humor us right here for a second, why do you consider that authorities watchdogs are essential?
HUITEMA: Properly, I feel they’re essential for a few causes. Regardless that they’re largely internally targeted, they do not have numerous visibility, I acknowledge that lots of people watching in all probability have by no means even heard of the Workplace of Authorities Ethics, however they assist set the tone and construct a tradition inside authorities of respect for the rule of regulation, adherence to the rule of regulation, a dedication to public service, and an expectation of accountability for that public service.
And in order these establishments are eroded, individuals might not see it instantly, however in time, you possibly can count on to see extra corruption, extra abuse of workplace and fewer accountability for that. The guardrails to form of discover and handle these sorts of considerations can be lowered.
And finally, I suppose my massive concern is that in the long term, if that continues now, a change of tradition is actually onerous to reverse.
ABC NEWS: David Huitema, we thanks a lot in your time. Admire it.
HUITEMA: Thanks.