Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • PlayStation gambles with 18-rated Wolverine game – does it pay off?
    • Urbandale Faces Valley in Iowa HS Football Showdown
    • Commentary: Some Anthropic engineers think AI might end us. Why race ahead?
    • CIA drops dozens of declassified documents on bin Laden and al-Qaeda | September 11 News
    • Brian Kelly’s sad realization about watching Lane Kiffin, LSU
    • Contributor: What if we stopped trying to be right?
    • A 9/11 widow reflects on 25 years of grief and what comes next
    • Market Talk – September 11, 2026
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»US News»Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin explains why she voted against Hegseth’s confirmation
    US News

    Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin explains why she voted against Hegseth’s confirmation

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsJanuary 26, 2025No Comments1 Min Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Michigan Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin defined why she voted towards confirming Pete Hegseth as secretary of protection on ABC Information’ “This Week” on Sunday.

    Hegseth, a former Fox Information host, was sworn into the position Saturday following a hair-thin vote within the Senate.

    Slotkin informed “This Week” co-anchor Martha Raddatz she had not been assured Hegseth can be extra loyal to the Structure than he can be to President Donald Trump.

    “He could not unambiguously say that he’ll push again if the president requested him to do one thing that wasn’t constitutional, and that, to me, is why I could not affirm him,” Slotkin stated. “There’s lots of different issues in his background I do not like, however I have a look at what’s the strategic and irreversible threats to our democracy, and that is utilizing the uniform army in ways in which violate the Structure.”

    It is a creating story. Please verify again for updates.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleBT scraps EV charging point scheme having only installed one
    Next Article Love letters from Angelenos after the fires
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    US News

    A 9/11 widow reflects on 25 years of grief and what comes next

    September 12, 2026
    US News

    Family of Celeste Rivas Hernandez files lawsuit against singer D4vd

    September 11, 2026
    US News

    Trump defends proposed $5,000 dividend as ‘reward,’ says ‘growth’ will pay for it

    September 11, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    Russia pounds Ukraine, kills more civilians before White House meeting | News

    August 18, 2025

    My immigrant parents would be horrified by masked ICE agents

    June 25, 2025

    Zelenskyy says Ukraine’s peace talks with US constructive but not easy

    December 8, 2025
    Our Picks

    PlayStation gambles with 18-rated Wolverine game – does it pay off?

    September 12, 2026

    Urbandale Faces Valley in Iowa HS Football Showdown

    September 12, 2026

    Commentary: Some Anthropic engineers think AI might end us. Why race ahead?

    September 12, 2026
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.