Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • The Man Who Understood Risk: Robert N. Charette retires.
    • New Jersey Cop Dresses Up Like a Shrub and Busts 74 Drivers Violating Cellphone Laws * The Gateway Pundit * by Cassandra MacDonald
    • Spain’s North Africa enclave returns to normal as migrants depart
    • Spain says migrants leaving Ceuta after mass influx in which 67 died | Migration News
    • Rams’ Sean McVay provides massive Aaron Donald update
    • Contributor: Censorship never stops with just two words
    • Tax returns show California’s Newsom earning between $1.7M and $2M annually
    • FCC Chair Brendan Carr Exposes ‘The View’ by Posting Video Montage of the Hosts Basically Campaigning for the Democrats
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»US News»Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin explains why she voted against Hegseth’s confirmation
    US News

    Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin explains why she voted against Hegseth’s confirmation

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsJanuary 26, 2025No Comments1 Min Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Michigan Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin defined why she voted towards confirming Pete Hegseth as secretary of protection on ABC Information’ “This Week” on Sunday.

    Hegseth, a former Fox Information host, was sworn into the position Saturday following a hair-thin vote within the Senate.

    Slotkin informed “This Week” co-anchor Martha Raddatz she had not been assured Hegseth can be extra loyal to the Structure than he can be to President Donald Trump.

    “He could not unambiguously say that he’ll push again if the president requested him to do one thing that wasn’t constitutional, and that, to me, is why I could not affirm him,” Slotkin stated. “There’s lots of different issues in his background I do not like, however I have a look at what’s the strategic and irreversible threats to our democracy, and that is utilizing the uniform army in ways in which violate the Structure.”

    It is a creating story. Please verify again for updates.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleBT scraps EV charging point scheme having only installed one
    Next Article Love letters from Angelenos after the fires
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    US News

    Tax returns show California’s Newsom earning between $1.7M and $2M annually

    August 1, 2026
    US News

    In reversal, Trump says he hasn’t ‘agreed to’ grant Ukraine licenses to produce Patriot missiles

    August 1, 2026
    US News

    Ohio Rep. Max Miller’s reelection bid faces questions after domestic abuse allegations

    August 1, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    The ‘3-Point-shooting leaders by season’ quiz

    June 24, 2026

    Verhaeghe launches Panthers into third straight Stanley Cup Final

    May 29, 2025

    Pierpaolo Piccioli takes over at Balenciaga from disrupter Demna

    May 20, 2025
    Our Picks

    The Man Who Understood Risk: Robert N. Charette retires.

    August 1, 2026

    New Jersey Cop Dresses Up Like a Shrub and Busts 74 Drivers Violating Cellphone Laws * The Gateway Pundit * by Cassandra MacDonald

    August 1, 2026

    Spain’s North Africa enclave returns to normal as migrants depart

    August 1, 2026
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.