Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Celebrity Blogger Perez Hilton Still Hospitalized After Cutting Himself on TikTok Live, Will Need Surgery * The Gateway Pundit * by Cristina Laila
    • FIFA condemns ‘concerted and ongoing effort’ to weaken Infantino
    • Hungary nominates former Supreme Court chief Andras Baka for presidency | Civil Rights News
    • Biggest moments from 2026 Pro Football HOF induction ceremony
    • Senate approves funding bill to avoid a shutdown before the election
    • WNBA Thug ASSAULTS Sophie Cunningham During Game, Sending Her Tumbling to Ground – Blames “White Privilege” After Getting Ejected (VIDEO)
    • Commentary: Who needs consultants in the age of AI?
    • Car bomb attack rattles Colombia after inauguration of hardline president | Crime News
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»US News»Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin explains why she voted against Hegseth’s confirmation
    US News

    Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin explains why she voted against Hegseth’s confirmation

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsJanuary 26, 2025No Comments1 Min Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Michigan Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin defined why she voted towards confirming Pete Hegseth as secretary of protection on ABC Information’ “This Week” on Sunday.

    Hegseth, a former Fox Information host, was sworn into the position Saturday following a hair-thin vote within the Senate.

    Slotkin informed “This Week” co-anchor Martha Raddatz she had not been assured Hegseth can be extra loyal to the Structure than he can be to President Donald Trump.

    “He could not unambiguously say that he’ll push again if the president requested him to do one thing that wasn’t constitutional, and that, to me, is why I could not affirm him,” Slotkin stated. “There’s lots of different issues in his background I do not like, however I have a look at what’s the strategic and irreversible threats to our democracy, and that is utilizing the uniform army in ways in which violate the Structure.”

    It is a creating story. Please verify again for updates.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleBT scraps EV charging point scheme having only installed one
    Next Article Love letters from Angelenos after the fires
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    US News

    Senate approves funding bill to avoid a shutdown before the election

    August 9, 2026
    US News

    Senators head for the exits without meeting Trump’s demands for voting bill

    August 8, 2026
    US News

    What makes Trump’s ballroom a matter of national security?

    August 8, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    Trump says India offered to reduce tariffs on US goods to zero

    September 1, 2025

    Stanley Cup Final Game 1 takeaways

    June 5, 2025

    AI Cyberattacks Meet Memory-Safe Code Defenses

    April 30, 2026
    Our Picks

    Celebrity Blogger Perez Hilton Still Hospitalized After Cutting Himself on TikTok Live, Will Need Surgery * The Gateway Pundit * by Cristina Laila

    August 9, 2026

    FIFA condemns ‘concerted and ongoing effort’ to weaken Infantino

    August 9, 2026

    Hungary nominates former Supreme Court chief Andras Baka for presidency | Civil Rights News

    August 9, 2026
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.