Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Elon Musk says Tesla-SpaceX merger being considered
    • Alberta Votes To Remain- Grievances Unresolved
    • Week 10 Matchups Could Scramble New Mexico Playoff Picture
    • Prince Harry says he wants to reconcile with family
    • Why former FDLR fighters are returning to Rwanda | News
    • NFLPA calls for NFL to investigate Eagles over Jalen Hurts
    • Letters to the Editor: It’s the patriarchy, not women’s fashion, that needs to be dismantled
    • Jane Doe says she felt ‘unsupported and disbelieved’ by Cornell president
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»US News»Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin explains why she voted against Hegseth’s confirmation
    US News

    Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin explains why she voted against Hegseth’s confirmation

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsJanuary 26, 2025No Comments1 Min Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Michigan Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin defined why she voted towards confirming Pete Hegseth as secretary of protection on ABC Information’ “This Week” on Sunday.

    Hegseth, a former Fox Information host, was sworn into the position Saturday following a hair-thin vote within the Senate.

    Slotkin informed “This Week” co-anchor Martha Raddatz she had not been assured Hegseth can be extra loyal to the Structure than he can be to President Donald Trump.

    “He could not unambiguously say that he’ll push again if the president requested him to do one thing that wasn’t constitutional, and that, to me, is why I could not affirm him,” Slotkin stated. “There’s lots of different issues in his background I do not like, however I have a look at what’s the strategic and irreversible threats to our democracy, and that is utilizing the uniform army in ways in which violate the Structure.”

    It is a creating story. Please verify again for updates.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleBT scraps EV charging point scheme having only installed one
    Next Article Love letters from Angelenos after the fires
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    US News

    Jane Doe says she felt ‘unsupported and disbelieved’ by Cornell president

    October 21, 2026
    US News

    SpaceX revenue soars 161% as AI business grows

    October 20, 2026
    US News

    Couple charged in fatal shooting of 17-year-old on her way to zoo

    October 20, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    Pistons are a winning club for first time since 2019

    January 9, 2025

    Zuckerberg To End Company Fact-Checking Censorship

    January 9, 2025

    HERE WE GO: Georgia Republican Reintroducing Bill to Make Blocking Highways in Protest a Federal Crime | The Gateway Pundit

    February 4, 2025
    Our Picks

    Elon Musk says Tesla-SpaceX merger being considered

    October 21, 2026

    Alberta Votes To Remain- Grievances Unresolved

    October 21, 2026

    Week 10 Matchups Could Scramble New Mexico Playoff Picture

    October 21, 2026
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.