Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Strait Of Hormuz Nearly Deserted
    • Trump Responds to WaPo Leak on His Secret Flight From Turkey and Plane Switch Amid Iranian Threat (VIDEO) * The Gateway Pundit * by Cristina Laila
    • Palestinian students and staff sue Columbia University alleging discrimination
    • Israeli raids, demolitions continue as UN warns West Bank at breaking point | Occupied West Bank News
    • Kalani Sitake wants greater investment into BYU football program
    • Trump says he was at ‘greater risk’ on secret flight than decoy Air Force One
    • Zapping Rocks Unlocks Stimulated Geologic Hydrogen
    • Rachel Maddow and Lawrence O’Donnell of MSNOW Yuk it Up Over Threat to Trump’s Life Overseas (VIDEO) * The Gateway Pundit * by Mike LaChance
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»US News»Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin explains why she voted against Hegseth’s confirmation
    US News

    Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin explains why she voted against Hegseth’s confirmation

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsJanuary 26, 2025No Comments1 Min Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Michigan Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin defined why she voted towards confirming Pete Hegseth as secretary of protection on ABC Information’ “This Week” on Sunday.

    Hegseth, a former Fox Information host, was sworn into the position Saturday following a hair-thin vote within the Senate.

    Slotkin informed “This Week” co-anchor Martha Raddatz she had not been assured Hegseth can be extra loyal to the Structure than he can be to President Donald Trump.

    “He could not unambiguously say that he’ll push again if the president requested him to do one thing that wasn’t constitutional, and that, to me, is why I could not affirm him,” Slotkin stated. “There’s lots of different issues in his background I do not like, however I have a look at what’s the strategic and irreversible threats to our democracy, and that is utilizing the uniform army in ways in which violate the Structure.”

    It is a creating story. Please verify again for updates.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleBT scraps EV charging point scheme having only installed one
    Next Article Love letters from Angelenos after the fires
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    US News

    Trump says he was at ‘greater risk’ on secret flight than decoy Air Force One

    August 12, 2026
    US News

    Trump’s reported covert flight puts spotlight on deceptive actions to protect the president: ANALYSIS

    August 12, 2026
    US News

    Voters in 6 states are choosing candidates for November

    August 11, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    Amazon tycoon Bezos arrives in Venice for lavish wedding, amid protests

    June 25, 2025

    Severe weather disrupts US’s 250th celebrations | Donald Trump News

    July 5, 2026

    Column: Misery has plenty of company in Trump’s second term

    February 15, 2026
    Our Picks

    Strait Of Hormuz Nearly Deserted

    August 12, 2026

    Trump Responds to WaPo Leak on His Secret Flight From Turkey and Plane Switch Amid Iranian Threat (VIDEO) * The Gateway Pundit * by Cristina Laila

    August 12, 2026

    Palestinian students and staff sue Columbia University alleging discrimination

    August 12, 2026
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.