Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • China – Middle East & 2027
    • Terrifying Invasive Species Silver-Cheeked Toadfish Is Spreading Throughout the Mediterranean With Its Toxic Flesh and Crushing Bite * The Gateway Pundit * by Paul Serran
    • Iran denies negotiating with US after Trump announces talks
    • Trump says new Iran negotiations starting: What we know | US-Israel war on Iran News
    • Yankees make questionable trade with Nationals
    • Iran live updates: Tehran says no US talks ongoing, Strait of Hormuz won’t revert to prewar status
    • Government Will Steal Your Land To Feed The AI Machine
    • Good News! Record Low Number of Schools are Restricting Free Speech * The Gateway Pundit * by Seth Segal
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»US News»Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin explains why she voted against Hegseth’s confirmation
    US News

    Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin explains why she voted against Hegseth’s confirmation

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsJanuary 26, 2025No Comments1 Min Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Michigan Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin defined why she voted towards confirming Pete Hegseth as secretary of protection on ABC Information’ “This Week” on Sunday.

    Hegseth, a former Fox Information host, was sworn into the position Saturday following a hair-thin vote within the Senate.

    Slotkin informed “This Week” co-anchor Martha Raddatz she had not been assured Hegseth can be extra loyal to the Structure than he can be to President Donald Trump.

    “He could not unambiguously say that he’ll push again if the president requested him to do one thing that wasn’t constitutional, and that, to me, is why I could not affirm him,” Slotkin stated. “There’s lots of different issues in his background I do not like, however I have a look at what’s the strategic and irreversible threats to our democracy, and that is utilizing the uniform army in ways in which violate the Structure.”

    It is a creating story. Please verify again for updates.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleBT scraps EV charging point scheme having only installed one
    Next Article Love letters from Angelenos after the fires
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    US News

    Iran live updates: Tehran says no US talks ongoing, Strait of Hormuz won’t revert to prewar status

    August 3, 2026
    US News

    Myanmar’s detained former leader Aung San Suu Kyi meets with International Red Cross

    August 3, 2026
    US News

    Brewers ace Jacob Misiorowski unloads on Angel Stadium mound after embarrassing Angels loss

    August 3, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    Mike Vrabel, Dianna Russini speak out on viral hotel photos

    April 8, 2026

    NIH terminating active research grants related to LGBTQ+, DEI studies

    March 8, 2025

    Students at Utah Valley University return to campus a week after Charlie Kirk shooting

    September 17, 2025
    Our Picks

    China – Middle East & 2027

    August 3, 2026

    Terrifying Invasive Species Silver-Cheeked Toadfish Is Spreading Throughout the Mediterranean With Its Toxic Flesh and Crushing Bite * The Gateway Pundit * by Paul Serran

    August 3, 2026

    Iran denies negotiating with US after Trump announces talks

    August 3, 2026
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.