Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • NFL training camp injuries Panic Meter: Where do these injuries rank? 
    • Police confirm fatalities, injuries after shooting at Idaho In-N-Out Burger
    • “Look for yourselves at the VANDALISM” – Burgum Also Slams US Attorney * The Gateway Pundit * by Jordan Conradson
    • ‘Very scary’: Greenland’s Southeast Asian migrants caught in Trump’s takeover push
    • Why did Ceuta migrant mayhem chill already frosty Israel-Spain relations? | Migration News
    • Warriors’ Curry can ‘absolutely’ make wild contract decision
    • Explosion in Moscow leaves at least 3 dead, 21 injured
    • White House Nukes Governor “Tampon Tim” Walz Highlighting Minnesota Practice of Allowing Unregistered Voters to Vote if Someone Vouches for Them
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»US News»Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin explains why she voted against Hegseth’s confirmation
    US News

    Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin explains why she voted against Hegseth’s confirmation

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsJanuary 26, 2025No Comments1 Min Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Michigan Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin defined why she voted towards confirming Pete Hegseth as secretary of protection on ABC Information’ “This Week” on Sunday.

    Hegseth, a former Fox Information host, was sworn into the position Saturday following a hair-thin vote within the Senate.

    Slotkin informed “This Week” co-anchor Martha Raddatz she had not been assured Hegseth can be extra loyal to the Structure than he can be to President Donald Trump.

    “He could not unambiguously say that he’ll push again if the president requested him to do one thing that wasn’t constitutional, and that, to me, is why I could not affirm him,” Slotkin stated. “There’s lots of different issues in his background I do not like, however I have a look at what’s the strategic and irreversible threats to our democracy, and that is utilizing the uniform army in ways in which violate the Structure.”

    It is a creating story. Please verify again for updates.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleBT scraps EV charging point scheme having only installed one
    Next Article Love letters from Angelenos after the fires
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    US News

    Police confirm fatalities, injuries after shooting at Idaho In-N-Out Burger

    August 2, 2026
    US News

    Explosion in Moscow leaves at least 3 dead, 21 injured

    August 1, 2026
    US News

    Rochester Police searching for clues after woman fatally shot after Puerto Rican festival

    August 1, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    Former New York Mayor Giuliani hospitalised in critical condition

    May 4, 2026

    In Gaza, water kills too | Israel-Palestine conflict

    July 26, 2025

    Trump says Xi assured him China would not send weapons to Iran | Donald Trump News

    May 19, 2026
    Our Picks

    NFL training camp injuries Panic Meter: Where do these injuries rank? 

    August 2, 2026

    Police confirm fatalities, injuries after shooting at Idaho In-N-Out Burger

    August 2, 2026

    “Look for yourselves at the VANDALISM” – Burgum Also Slams US Attorney * The Gateway Pundit * by Jordan Conradson

    August 1, 2026
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.