Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • US to set limits on Egyptian bank in effort to pressure Iran: official
    • Liverpool strike deal to sign PSG’s Barcola for up to $166m: Reports | Football News
    • Sean McVay makes big admission about Aaron Donald
    • Contributor: All I wanted was an empty house. Now I want my kids back.
    • Trump establishes US space academy as Artemis II crew receives Space Medal of Honor
    • Canfield Battles Salem in High School Football Showdown
    • Thailand warns ‘problematic’ tourists could face deportation
    • Aston Villa sign Chelsea striker Nicolas Jackson for reported club record | Football News
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»US News»Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin explains why she voted against Hegseth’s confirmation
    US News

    Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin explains why she voted against Hegseth’s confirmation

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsJanuary 26, 2025No Comments1 Min Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Michigan Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin defined why she voted towards confirming Pete Hegseth as secretary of protection on ABC Information’ “This Week” on Sunday.

    Hegseth, a former Fox Information host, was sworn into the position Saturday following a hair-thin vote within the Senate.

    Slotkin informed “This Week” co-anchor Martha Raddatz she had not been assured Hegseth can be extra loyal to the Structure than he can be to President Donald Trump.

    “He could not unambiguously say that he’ll push again if the president requested him to do one thing that wasn’t constitutional, and that, to me, is why I could not affirm him,” Slotkin stated. “There’s lots of different issues in his background I do not like, however I have a look at what’s the strategic and irreversible threats to our democracy, and that is utilizing the uniform army in ways in which violate the Structure.”

    It is a creating story. Please verify again for updates.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleBT scraps EV charging point scheme having only installed one
    Next Article Love letters from Angelenos after the fires
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    US News

    Trump establishes US space academy as Artemis II crew receives Space Medal of Honor

    August 29, 2026
    US News

    FBI no longer treating an applicant’s experience with prostitution as automatic bar against hiring

    August 29, 2026
    US News

    Trump announces ‘historic’ US-Venezuela oil deal that he says will lower gas prices

    August 29, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    Understanding the patient makes all the difference in healthcare

    July 11, 2026

    BREAKING: Trump Terminates All Trade Negotiations With Canada After Government of Ontario ‘Fraudulently’ Uses Ad Campaign Featuring Ronald Reagan Speaking Negatively About Tariffs | The Gateway Pundit

    October 24, 2025

    Contributor: Closing the labor-force gap is the only fix for the housing crisis

    December 10, 2025
    Our Picks

    US to set limits on Egyptian bank in effort to pressure Iran: official

    August 29, 2026

    Liverpool strike deal to sign PSG’s Barcola for up to $166m: Reports | Football News

    August 29, 2026

    Sean McVay makes big admission about Aaron Donald

    August 29, 2026
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.