Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Graham and Westside Dominate Rivalry Week
    • Milei says ‘winds of change’ favour Argentina in Falklands row
    • Missouri Supreme Court blocks Trump-backed map from November’s midterms | US Midterm Elections 2026 News
    • Judge’s ruling paves way for former NFL players to join LSU
    • Judge Judy’s insults are unfair to the L.A. County assessor’s office
    • Lindsay Clancy trial: What does it mean to be ‘not guilty by lack of responsibility?’
    • Ratcliffe’s Secret Urgent Meeting
    • Labor Day Vibes in Aspen
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»US News»Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin explains why she voted against Hegseth’s confirmation
    US News

    Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin explains why she voted against Hegseth’s confirmation

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsJanuary 26, 2025No Comments1 Min Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Michigan Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin defined why she voted towards confirming Pete Hegseth as secretary of protection on ABC Information’ “This Week” on Sunday.

    Hegseth, a former Fox Information host, was sworn into the position Saturday following a hair-thin vote within the Senate.

    Slotkin informed “This Week” co-anchor Martha Raddatz she had not been assured Hegseth can be extra loyal to the Structure than he can be to President Donald Trump.

    “He could not unambiguously say that he’ll push again if the president requested him to do one thing that wasn’t constitutional, and that, to me, is why I could not affirm him,” Slotkin stated. “There’s lots of different issues in his background I do not like, however I have a look at what’s the strategic and irreversible threats to our democracy, and that is utilizing the uniform army in ways in which violate the Structure.”

    It is a creating story. Please verify again for updates.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleBT scraps EV charging point scheme having only installed one
    Next Article Love letters from Angelenos after the fires
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    US News

    Lindsay Clancy trial: What does it mean to be ‘not guilty by lack of responsibility?’

    September 4, 2026
    US News

    Excavation work to build Trump’s triumphal arch to begin over next 2 weeks, Interior secretary says

    September 4, 2026
    US News

    Trump admin threatens to cut federal support for Smithsonian as it accuses leadership of ‘ideological activism’

    September 3, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    Retail sales up 1.7% in March from February driven by a spike in gas prices

    April 21, 2026

    CNN’s Scott Jennings Gets Democrat to Admit NY Case Against Trump Was Just Part of the Organized ‘Resistance’ (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit

    May 16, 2025

    UK police make second arrest over Manchester mosque incident

    February 26, 2026
    Our Picks

    Graham and Westside Dominate Rivalry Week

    September 4, 2026

    Milei says ‘winds of change’ favour Argentina in Falklands row

    September 4, 2026

    Missouri Supreme Court blocks Trump-backed map from November’s midterms | US Midterm Elections 2026 News

    September 4, 2026
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.