Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Could tech replace firefighters in the battle against wildfires?
    • Zelensky Pushing For WWIII | Armstrong Economics
    • Pete Buttigieg Wants to Abolish the Electoral College and Pack SCOTUS but Can’t See Why Anyone Thinks This is Radical (VIDEO)
    • CDC expands largest known cyclospora outbreak to 15 states, Washington Post reports
    • Why the Trump administration is helping support Japan’s weakening yen | Financial Markets
    • Robinson extension continues curious Falcons offseason strategy
    • Contributor: Weight loss from GLP-1s is leaving behind Black and Latino Californians
    • Police respond to Perez Hilton’s home after he appeared to harm himself on livestream
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»US News»Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin explains why she voted against Hegseth’s confirmation
    US News

    Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin explains why she voted against Hegseth’s confirmation

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsJanuary 26, 2025No Comments1 Min Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Michigan Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin defined why she voted towards confirming Pete Hegseth as secretary of protection on ABC Information’ “This Week” on Sunday.

    Hegseth, a former Fox Information host, was sworn into the position Saturday following a hair-thin vote within the Senate.

    Slotkin informed “This Week” co-anchor Martha Raddatz she had not been assured Hegseth can be extra loyal to the Structure than he can be to President Donald Trump.

    “He could not unambiguously say that he’ll push again if the president requested him to do one thing that wasn’t constitutional, and that, to me, is why I could not affirm him,” Slotkin stated. “There’s lots of different issues in his background I do not like, however I have a look at what’s the strategic and irreversible threats to our democracy, and that is utilizing the uniform army in ways in which violate the Structure.”

    It is a creating story. Please verify again for updates.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleBT scraps EV charging point scheme having only installed one
    Next Article Love letters from Angelenos after the fires
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    US News

    Police respond to Perez Hilton’s home after he appeared to harm himself on livestream

    August 5, 2026
    US News

    High-stakes Michigan Senate race among primaries in 5 states

    August 5, 2026
    US News

    Michigan 2026 live primary election results

    August 5, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    Elitist Michelle Obama Spotted in Los Angeles with $4,000 Luxury Handbag | The Gateway Pundit

    April 20, 2025

    These common items from 2000s could soon be worth thousands – do you have any?

    October 14, 2025

    Yamal and Raphinha fire Barcelona to La Liga opening win at Mallorca | Football News

    August 16, 2025
    Our Picks

    Could tech replace firefighters in the battle against wildfires?

    August 5, 2026

    Zelensky Pushing For WWIII | Armstrong Economics

    August 5, 2026

    Pete Buttigieg Wants to Abolish the Electoral College and Pack SCOTUS but Can’t See Why Anyone Thinks This is Radical (VIDEO)

    August 5, 2026
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.