Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Inventing Eliza: The First Chatbot’s Hidden Code
    • Rigging Elections | Armstrong Economics
    • Blanche Suggests He Is Going to Investigate and Prosecute Jack Smith For Perjury (VIDEO) * The Gateway Pundit * by Cristina Laila
    • China and Xi are seen more favourably than the US and Trump in many nations, Pew study suggests
    • ‘Epic squared’: Scaloni lauds Argentina’s back-to-back World Cup comebacks | World Cup 2026 News
    • Mensah talks how success of Ward, Beck persuaded him to transfer
    • Contributor: California schools are on the frontlines of fighting homelessness. Now they have funding.
    • Maine governor urges Congress to reform or abolish ICE after fatal shooting
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»US News»Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin explains why she voted against Hegseth’s confirmation
    US News

    Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin explains why she voted against Hegseth’s confirmation

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsJanuary 26, 2025No Comments1 Min Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Michigan Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin defined why she voted towards confirming Pete Hegseth as secretary of protection on ABC Information’ “This Week” on Sunday.

    Hegseth, a former Fox Information host, was sworn into the position Saturday following a hair-thin vote within the Senate.

    Slotkin informed “This Week” co-anchor Martha Raddatz she had not been assured Hegseth can be extra loyal to the Structure than he can be to President Donald Trump.

    “He could not unambiguously say that he’ll push again if the president requested him to do one thing that wasn’t constitutional, and that, to me, is why I could not affirm him,” Slotkin stated. “There’s lots of different issues in his background I do not like, however I have a look at what’s the strategic and irreversible threats to our democracy, and that is utilizing the uniform army in ways in which violate the Structure.”

    It is a creating story. Please verify again for updates.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleBT scraps EV charging point scheme having only installed one
    Next Article Love letters from Angelenos after the fires
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    US News

    Maine governor urges Congress to reform or abolish ICE after fatal shooting

    July 16, 2026
    US News

    US Mint to begin striking dollar coin featuring Trump

    July 15, 2026
    US News

    Dr. Erica Schwartz faces questions about vaccines at CDC director confirmation hearing

    July 15, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    The Blockade & The Future

    April 27, 2026

    US-EU tensions deepen over Greenland as Trump’s Europe strategy comes under scrutiny

    January 21, 2026

    Justice Department faces subpoena over Epstein files by House Oversight Committee

    July 24, 2025
    Our Picks

    Inventing Eliza: The First Chatbot’s Hidden Code

    July 16, 2026

    Rigging Elections | Armstrong Economics

    July 16, 2026

    Blanche Suggests He Is Going to Investigate and Prosecute Jack Smith For Perjury (VIDEO) * The Gateway Pundit * by Cristina Laila

    July 16, 2026
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.