Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • How a Cambridge Project Rescues Fading Floppy Disk Data
    • It Is CRUCIAL To Understand The Economic Confidence Model
    • Commentary: AP x Swatch Royal Pop collection – When a launch brings crowds and chaos, it is a marketing disaster
    • Chemical tank rupture kills multiple people in US state of Washington | Health News
    • Chargers give Derwin James Jr. another historic extension
    • Column: The Democratic Party ‘autopsy’ somehow disappointed everyone
    • Texas Senate runoff tests Trump’s influence
    • Tech Life – Teaching in the AI world
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»US News»Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin explains why she voted against Hegseth’s confirmation
    US News

    Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin explains why she voted against Hegseth’s confirmation

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsJanuary 26, 2025No Comments1 Min Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Michigan Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin defined why she voted towards confirming Pete Hegseth as secretary of protection on ABC Information’ “This Week” on Sunday.

    Hegseth, a former Fox Information host, was sworn into the position Saturday following a hair-thin vote within the Senate.

    Slotkin informed “This Week” co-anchor Martha Raddatz she had not been assured Hegseth can be extra loyal to the Structure than he can be to President Donald Trump.

    “He could not unambiguously say that he’ll push again if the president requested him to do one thing that wasn’t constitutional, and that, to me, is why I could not affirm him,” Slotkin stated. “There’s lots of different issues in his background I do not like, however I have a look at what’s the strategic and irreversible threats to our democracy, and that is utilizing the uniform army in ways in which violate the Structure.”

    It is a creating story. Please verify again for updates.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleBT scraps EV charging point scheme having only installed one
    Next Article Love letters from Angelenos after the fires
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    US News

    Texas Senate runoff tests Trump’s influence

    May 27, 2026
    US News

    Appeals court ruling will prevent Mahmoud Khalil’s removal while he seeks Supreme Court review

    May 26, 2026
    US News

    Multiple people injured in chemical vat implosion at facility in Washington state

    May 26, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    Protesters aren’t ‘terrorists.’ They honor our American heritage

    January 31, 2026

    Letters to the Editor: There’s too much focus on the price of eggs

    March 12, 2025

    NHS in numbers: Spending cap, wait times and private-firm profits

    April 13, 2026
    Our Picks

    How a Cambridge Project Rescues Fading Floppy Disk Data

    May 27, 2026

    It Is CRUCIAL To Understand The Economic Confidence Model

    May 27, 2026

    Commentary: AP x Swatch Royal Pop collection – When a launch brings crowds and chaos, it is a marketing disaster

    May 27, 2026
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.