Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • First OpenAI, now Meta – why do AI hacks keep happening?
    • The Global Outlook | Armstrong Economics
    • Fauci’s Attorney Gaslights America with Delusional Statement After Senate Homeland Security Committee Passes Contempt Resolution
    • US Senate panel votes to hold Fauci in contempt of Congress
    • Israel indicts settler in rare charge over Palestinian activist’s killing | Israel-Palestine conflict News
    • The ‘Most 100-catch NFL seasons’ quiz
    • Letters to the Editor: The cruel poisoning of magnificent wild elephants is ‘horrendous’
    • Duckworth bill targets Pentagon’s confusing accounting of Iran war casualties
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»US News»Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin explains why she voted against Hegseth’s confirmation
    US News

    Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin explains why she voted against Hegseth’s confirmation

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsJanuary 26, 2025No Comments1 Min Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Michigan Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin defined why she voted towards confirming Pete Hegseth as secretary of protection on ABC Information’ “This Week” on Sunday.

    Hegseth, a former Fox Information host, was sworn into the position Saturday following a hair-thin vote within the Senate.

    Slotkin informed “This Week” co-anchor Martha Raddatz she had not been assured Hegseth can be extra loyal to the Structure than he can be to President Donald Trump.

    “He could not unambiguously say that he’ll push again if the president requested him to do one thing that wasn’t constitutional, and that, to me, is why I could not affirm him,” Slotkin stated. “There’s lots of different issues in his background I do not like, however I have a look at what’s the strategic and irreversible threats to our democracy, and that is utilizing the uniform army in ways in which violate the Structure.”

    It is a creating story. Please verify again for updates.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleBT scraps EV charging point scheme having only installed one
    Next Article Love letters from Angelenos after the fires
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    US News

    Duckworth bill targets Pentagon’s confusing accounting of Iran war casualties

    August 6, 2026
    US News

    Blanche meets with 2 key Republican senators ahead of confirmation vote

    August 6, 2026
    US News

    El-Sayed won the crucial Michigan Senate primary. Now comes the coalition test: ANALYSIS

    August 6, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    Letters to the Editor: ‘Polystyrene foam should have never been born. Let it die.’

    July 18, 2026

    ABC News Selectively Leaks Portions of Memo Authored by Fired Prosecutor to Help Discredit Indictment Against Letitia James | The Gateway Pundit

    October 25, 2025

    Contributor: Radio should be required to pay performers for their music

    January 31, 2026
    Our Picks

    First OpenAI, now Meta – why do AI hacks keep happening?

    August 6, 2026

    The Global Outlook | Armstrong Economics

    August 6, 2026

    Fauci’s Attorney Gaslights America with Delusional Statement After Senate Homeland Security Committee Passes Contempt Resolution

    August 6, 2026
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.