Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Regulating AI ‘not the right place to start’ says Bank of England governor
    • When Confidence Turns, The Economy Follows
    • SCAC Football: Offensive Leaders Through Week 5
    • Iran says received US response to its proposal to end war
    • ‘I wanted to live’: A Ukrainian orphan’s journey through Russian occupation | Russia-Ukraine war News
    • Jacob Markstrom impresses in season-opening win vs. Hurricanes
    • Contributor: There’s a reason people are still talking about Julie Andrews as she turns 91
    • Cornell student said encounter at fraternity house ‘felt like coercion’ in 2024 statement to police
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»US News»Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin explains why she voted against Hegseth’s confirmation
    US News

    Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin explains why she voted against Hegseth’s confirmation

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsJanuary 26, 2025No Comments1 Min Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Michigan Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin defined why she voted towards confirming Pete Hegseth as secretary of protection on ABC Information’ “This Week” on Sunday.

    Hegseth, a former Fox Information host, was sworn into the position Saturday following a hair-thin vote within the Senate.

    Slotkin informed “This Week” co-anchor Martha Raddatz she had not been assured Hegseth can be extra loyal to the Structure than he can be to President Donald Trump.

    “He could not unambiguously say that he’ll push again if the president requested him to do one thing that wasn’t constitutional, and that, to me, is why I could not affirm him,” Slotkin stated. “There’s lots of different issues in his background I do not like, however I have a look at what’s the strategic and irreversible threats to our democracy, and that is utilizing the uniform army in ways in which violate the Structure.”

    It is a creating story. Please verify again for updates.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleBT scraps EV charging point scheme having only installed one
    Next Article Love letters from Angelenos after the fires
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    US News

    Cornell student said encounter at fraternity house ‘felt like coercion’ in 2024 statement to police

    September 30, 2026
    US News

    White Sox receive letter from Pope Leo XIV on playoff opener

    September 30, 2026
    US News

    Last US troops expected to leave Iraq on Wednesday following 12-year fight against ISIS

    September 30, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    Israel’s president pardons a combat medic whose shooting of a Palestinian attacker caused debate

    September 19, 2026

    Letters to the Editor: A living wage isn’t just an economic issue — it’s a justice one

    May 17, 2025

    ‘Catch of the day’: Trump launches new ICE immigration crackdown in Maine | Donald Trump News

    January 22, 2026
    Our Picks

    Regulating AI ‘not the right place to start’ says Bank of England governor

    September 30, 2026

    When Confidence Turns, The Economy Follows

    September 30, 2026

    SCAC Football: Offensive Leaders Through Week 5

    September 30, 2026
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.