Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • How the US could try to seize Iran’s Kharg Island – and why it might backfire
    • Drone attack sparks fire on Kuwaiti tanker in UAE amid Iran’s Gulf attacks | US-Israel war on Iran News
    • Turkiye vs. Kosovo: Breaking down USMNT’s potential World Cup opponents
    • Japan deploys its first long-range missiles
    • White House ballroom project to include ‘massive’ military complex
    • Pentagon denies that Hegseth’s broker sought investment before Iran war | Business and Economy News
    • The ‘Active 30-point NBA games leaders’ quiz
    • Trump urging Congress to come back from recess to fund DHS as shutdown drags on, White House says
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»US News»Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin explains why she voted against Hegseth’s confirmation
    US News

    Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin explains why she voted against Hegseth’s confirmation

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsJanuary 26, 2025No Comments1 Min Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Michigan Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin defined why she voted towards confirming Pete Hegseth as secretary of protection on ABC Information’ “This Week” on Sunday.

    Hegseth, a former Fox Information host, was sworn into the position Saturday following a hair-thin vote within the Senate.

    Slotkin informed “This Week” co-anchor Martha Raddatz she had not been assured Hegseth can be extra loyal to the Structure than he can be to President Donald Trump.

    “He could not unambiguously say that he’ll push again if the president requested him to do one thing that wasn’t constitutional, and that, to me, is why I could not affirm him,” Slotkin stated. “There’s lots of different issues in his background I do not like, however I have a look at what’s the strategic and irreversible threats to our democracy, and that is utilizing the uniform army in ways in which violate the Structure.”

    It is a creating story. Please verify again for updates.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleBT scraps EV charging point scheme having only installed one
    Next Article Love letters from Angelenos after the fires
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    US News

    Japan deploys its first long-range missiles

    March 31, 2026
    US News

    Trump urging Congress to come back from recess to fund DHS as shutdown drags on, White House says

    March 31, 2026
    US News

    Florida Gov. DeSantis signs bill to rename Palm Beach airport after Trump

    March 31, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    Letters to the Editor: Will California address the issue of its out-of-state firefighters?

    January 26, 2026

    Draining the Swamp: Pres. Trump Formally Instructs All Federal Agencies to Prepare for Large-Scale Bureaucracy Cuts by March 13 | The Gateway Pundit

    February 27, 2025

    NFL executive shares big revelation about A.J. Brown trade rumors

    October 13, 2025
    Our Picks

    How the US could try to seize Iran’s Kharg Island – and why it might backfire

    March 31, 2026

    Drone attack sparks fire on Kuwaiti tanker in UAE amid Iran’s Gulf attacks | US-Israel war on Iran News

    March 31, 2026

    Turkiye vs. Kosovo: Breaking down USMNT’s potential World Cup opponents

    March 31, 2026
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.