Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Tehran’s Surveillance State – Coming To A Regime Near You
    • Iran foreign minister met IAEA chief ahead of nuclear talks
    • Incoming Bangladesh PM Tarique Rahman, lawmakers sworn into parliament | Bangladesh Election 2026 News
    • The ‘NBA All-Star MVPs’ quiz
    • Trump calls DHS funding fight a ‘Democrat shutdown,’ says GOP has ‘nothing’ to do with it
    • US judge cites ‘1984’ in ordering reinstatement of slavery exhibit
    • Australian PM Albanese says no help for ISIL relatives held in Syria camp | ISIL/ISIS News
    • Former NFL GM sends Rodgers warning to Steelers amid reports
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»Opinions»‘Constructive’? Look again at the smoke and mirrors of the Trump-Putin summit
    Opinions

    ‘Constructive’? Look again at the smoke and mirrors of the Trump-Putin summit

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsAugust 26, 2025No Comments7 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    We’ve learn fairly a bit about President Trump’s “hot mic” comment, throughout a gathering with European leaders in regards to the Russian conflict towards Ukraine, that Vladimir Putin “needs to make a deal for me, as loopy because it sounds.”

    Pundits debated whether or not this was a humiliation for Trump; they puzzled why he would say such an vital factor in a whisper to French President Emmanuel Macron — as if Trump’s verbal goulash have been one thing new. Headlines have been filled with the phrase “deal” for some time, together with three days later, after they have been reporting that Trump stated Putin may not need “to make a deal.” And, in fact, there isn’t a deal.

    The press protection of the assembly in Alaska stated there have been plenty of “constructive” conversations. Putin spoke about “neighborly” talks and the “constructive ambiance of mutual respect” in his conversations with Trump. There have been studies about agreements “in precept” on varied issues underneath dialogue, though there have been no particulars about what they is perhaps.

    I lined quite a lot of superpower summits, first as a reporter for the Related Press and later for the New York Occasions. Though that was greater than 30 years in the past, the smoke and mirrors nonsense normally produced by conferences like these has not modified. Verbal gasoline is plentiful and details virtually nonexistent. Trump’s feedback have been price about as a lot as the rest he has stated on the topic, which is sort of nothing. And but, they have been reported and parsed endlessly as if that they had the identical that means as different presidents’ phrases had prior to now.

    I had a robust sense of deja vu from a five-day journey to Afghanistan in January 1987. The Kremlin had lastly agreed to let a bunch of Western journalists go to Kabul and Jalalabad to witness the “cease-fire” that had been introduced a number of days earlier than we arrived. The go to was billed as an Afghan authorities tour, which no person — particularly the Afghan authorities — believed.

    We noticed no preventing, though we might see artillery hearth within the hills at evening. A number of the “specials,” as we wire service correspondents referred to as the main media then, reported that we have been fired on. We weren’t.

    Principally, we shopped for rugs and drank chilly Heinekens, which have been unavailable in Moscow however mysteriously nicely stocked on the Intercontinental Lodge in Kabul. We have been ushered to varied peace and unity occasions between the Afghan and Russian peoples and toured the massive Soviet army camps simply exterior Kabul with a U.S. official (allegedly a diplomat from the Embassy, however we knew from expertise that this particular person was from the Central Intelligence Company).

    On Jan. 19, we have been taken (every reporter in a person authorities automotive with a minder) to a information convention by Mohammad Najib, the Afghan chief whose title had been Najibullah till he modified it to make it sound much less spiritual for his Bolshevik pals. Najib stated that Afghanistan and the Soviet Union had agreed “in precept” on a “timetable for withdrawal” of Soviet occupation forces.

    At that time, the Reuters correspondent, who was pretty new to Moscow nonetheless, bolted from the room and raced again to our resort, the place there was one Telex machine for us all to ship our tales again to Moscow. He filed a bulletin on the announcement. When the remainder of us made our leisurely return, we have been greeted with messages from our house workplaces demanding to know in regards to the large deal to finish the conflict in Afghanistan.

    We wrote our tales, which have been a few business-as-usual press convention that yielded no actual information. We every appended a message to clarify why the Reuters report was simply plain unsuitable. Speak of Soviet withdrawal was widespread, and all the time unsuitable. The very concept that the puppet authorities in Kabul had one thing to say about it or was a celebration to any severe discussions about ending the conflict was absurd. Probably the most pithy remark got here from the Agence France-Presse reporter, who informed her editors that the Reuters story was “merde.” The Soviet army didn’t withdraw till February 1989, greater than two years later, following its personal schedule.

    A lot of the latest protection about Russia and Ukraine jogs my memory of that Afghan information flash in 1987. The Kremlin has by no means been, was not then and isn’t now considering negotiation or compromise. Below Soviet communism and underneath Putin, diplomacy is a zero-sum recreation whose solely purpose is to revive Russian hegemony over Jap Europe. And but, for some cause, the American media and the nation’s diplomats appear as oblivious at present as they all the time have been. After the summit, they introduced breathlessly that there was no peace deal out of the summit, though all of them knew moving into that there was no deal on the desk and there by no means was going to be one.

    However in fact Putin needs a “deal” on Ukraine. It’s the identical deal he has needed since he violated worldwide regulation (not for the primary time) and invaded Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022. He needs to redraw the boundaries of Ukraine to provide him much more territory than he has already seized, and he needs to make certain Ukraine stays out of NATO and underneath Moscow’s army thumb as he has finished with different former Soviet areas, like Georgia, which he invaded in 2008 as quickly because the nation dared to counsel it is perhaps considering NATO membership. His newest nonsense was to demand that Russia be a part of any postwar safety preparations. He needs the NATO allies to cease treating him just like the conflict legal that he’s and to be seen as an equal actor on the worldwide stage with NATO and particularly the USA.

    That he received, in abundance, from Trump in Alaska, beginning with the placement. Trump invited Putin to the USA throughout a interval of journey bans to and from Russia, instantly giving the Russian dictator an enormous PR win. It additionally, conveniently, put him in the one NATO nation the place he isn’t needed on costs of crimes towards humanity.

    As for peace talks, examine the headlines from Ukraine earlier than, throughout and after the Alaska summit: The Russians have stepped up their killing and destruction in Ukraine with new ferocity and have been grabbing as a lot land in japanese Ukraine as they will. Each sq. inch of that land — and extra the Kremlin has not but occupied — shall be a part of any “deal” that Putin will settle for. Trump himself has been speaking about “land swaps” (as he has from the beginning of the conflict, by the way in which) — a nonsensical thought when you think about the land Ukraine holds is its sovereign territory and the land Russian holds was stolen.

    The good M. Gessen, maybe the main authority on dictatorship, revealed an essay within the New York Evaluation, “Autocracy: Rules for Survival,” shortly after the 2016 election. “Rule #2: Don’t be taken in by small indicators of normality,” they wrote.

    A U.S. president and a Russian chief sitting down to speak and rising with bluster about progress appears regular sufficient, maybe encouraging when American-Russian relations have been at a historic low. Simply do not forget that coming from these two males, the feedback signify nothing — or, worse, make us surprise what Trump has given away to Putin along with his speak of land swaps.

    Andrew Rosenthal, a former reporter, editor and columnist, was Moscow bureau chief for the Related Press and Washington editor and later editorial web page editor for the New York Occasions.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleTrump ‘very angry’ with Putin as Russia’s strikes on Ukraine continue despite peace push
    Next Article Derrick Rose’s impact in Chicago goes way beyond basketball
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Opinions

    Contributor: Blending hydrogen into gas pipelines would enrich utilities and harm Californians

    February 16, 2026
    Opinions

    In Venice, it’s taken nearly a decade to not build low-income housing

    February 15, 2026
    Opinions

    Letters to the Editor: Casey Wasserman could learn a thing or two from Peter Ueberroth

    February 15, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    Doug Martin, former NFL Buccaneers All-Pro running back, dies at 36 | American Football News

    October 20, 2025

    Inflation climbed in August as Trump’s tariffs intensified

    September 11, 2025

    Rangers HC Mike Sullivan proven right on rookie demotion

    November 14, 2025
    Our Picks

    Tehran’s Surveillance State – Coming To A Regime Near You

    February 17, 2026

    Iran foreign minister met IAEA chief ahead of nuclear talks

    February 17, 2026

    Incoming Bangladesh PM Tarique Rahman, lawmakers sworn into parliament | Bangladesh Election 2026 News

    February 17, 2026
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.