PROLONGED AND ESCALATING COSTS
In the meantime Iran’s strategic posture is rooted in many years of getting ready for exactly this situation. For the reason that 1979 revolution, Tehran’s navy doctrine and overseas coverage have been formed by survival within the face of potential exterior assault.
Reasonably than constructing a traditional drive capable of defeat the US in open fight, Iran has invested in uneven capabilities: ballistic and cruise missiles, the usage of regional proxies, cyber operations and anti-access methods (together with missiles, air defences, naval mines, quick assault craft, drones and digital warfare capabilities). Anybody who assaults Iran would face extended and escalating prices.
That is why comparisons to Iraq in 2003 are deceptive. Iran is bigger, extra populous, extra internally cohesive and way more militarily ready for a sustained confrontation.
An assault on Iranian territory wouldn’t symbolize the opening part of regime collapse however the ultimate layer of a defensive technique that anticipates precisely such a situation. Tehran can be ready to soak up injury and is able to inflicting it throughout a number of theatres – together with in Iraq, the Gulf, Yemen and past.
With an annual defence finances approaching US$900 billion, there is no such thing as a query that the US has the capability to provoke a battle with Iran. However the problem for the US lies not in beginning a conflict, however in sustaining one.
The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan provide a cautionary precedent. Collectively, they’re estimated to have price the US between US$6 trillion and US$8 trillion when long-term veterans’ care, curiosity funds and reconstruction are included.
These conflicts stretched over many years, repeatedly exceeded preliminary price projections and contributed to ballooning public debt. A conflict with Iran – bigger, extra succesful and extra regionally embedded – would nearly actually comply with an identical, if no more costly, trajectory.
