Secretary of Protection Pete Hegseth berated his Democratic questioners and former administrations in a contentious listening to earlier than the Home Armed Providers Committee that was scheduled to debate the Pentagon’s 2027 budget however was extra a debate on the war with Iran.
Hegseth set the tone for what was to return in his opening assertion, saying, “The most important adversary we face at this level are the reckless, feckless and defeatist phrases of congressional Democrats and a few Republicans.”
Wednesday’s look is Hegseth’s first look earlier than Congress for the reason that warfare began. He’ll testify earlier than the Senate Armed Providers Committee on Thursday concerning the Pentagon’s request for a $1.5 trillion funds for 2027, essentially the most the Pentagon has ever requested.
Protection Secretary Pete Hegseth testifies earlier than a Home Armed Providers Committee listening to on the Division of Protection’s FY27 funds request on Capitol Hill in Washington, April 29, 2026.
Elizabeth Frantz/Reuters
Calculations for that funds request have been finalized months in the past, earlier than the U.S. and Israel attacked Iran in February, and would not account for spending on the Iran warfare.
Jules Hurst III, the Pentagon comptroller, testified the warfare has up to now value $25 billion. The Pentagon has mentioned it’ll ask for $200 billion in supplemental funding for the marketing campaign.
Hegseth and Democrats — in addition to some Republicans — traded barbs over the rationale of the warfare and its timetable and Hegseth’s firings of high-ranking army officers.
Two Republicans — Reps. Don Bacon and Austin Scott — advised Hegseth they disagreed together with his firing of Gen. Randy George, the previous Military chief of workers. GOP Rep. Jen Kiggans, a Republican, raised questions over Hegseth’s firing of former Navy Secretary John Phelan.
“As you are evaluating whether or not they’re operating with the mission they have been given, you bought to make a change,” Hegseth mentioned about Phelan’s firing.
Two dozen senior officers have been fired or had their promotions blocked with out rationalization by the Pentagon. Hegseth made a equally obscure touch upon the firing of John Phelan who served as Navy secretary.
“You may have the constitutional proper to do this stuff, but it surely doesn’t make it proper or clever,” Bacon mentioned.

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Employees Basic Dan Caine testifies earlier than a Home Armed Providers Committee listening to on the Division of Protection’s FY27 funds request on Capitol Hill in Washington, April 29, 2026.
Elizabeth Frantz/Reuters
Hegseth was additionally requested concerning the 4 colonels who have been blocked from promotion to one-star normal. Two of these officers are Black and two are ladies. None of these officers have been going through any self-discipline points and have been totally vetted earlier than being tapped for promotion, in accordance with two U.S. officers.
“I anticipate different officers will likely be eliminated additionally,” Hegseth mentioned with out providing a rationale.
Democratic Rep. John Garamendi accused Hegseth of mendacity concerning the warfare’s progress and slammed him for what he mentioned was shifting causes for beginning the warfare.
“Price of residing, gasoline costs are up 40% and inflation is hovering,” Garamendi mentioned. “A lot for decreasing the price of residing. The president has received himself in America caught within the quagmire of one other warfare within the Center East. He is desperately attempting to extricate himself from his personal errors.”
“You stain the troops once you name this a quagmire two months in, handing propaganda to our enemies,” Hegseth responded.

Committee Rating Member Rep. Adam Smith asks questions of Secretary of Protection Pete Hegseth earlier than the Home Armed Providers Committee within the Rayburn Home Workplace Constructing in Washington, April 29, 026.
Luke Johnson/EPA/Shutterstock
In a tense trade, rating Democrat Adam Smith pressed Hegseth to reconcile two seemingly incompatible claims: that Iran’s nuclear program was “obliterated” throughout final summer time’s assault on its nuclear amenities and President Donald Trump and different administration officers have mentioned, and that its nuclear program posed an imminent risk which was used as justification for launching the warfare.
Hegseth mentioned that regardless of “obliterated” nuclear capabilities that the US is surveilling 24/7, Iran maintained an “ambition” and “standard protect” that posed a risk.
“What’s the plan to really flip all of this deadly kinetic motion into an enchancment within the nuclear scenario? As a result of we have not gotten there but. Play it out for us. How does that occur? How does it really result in that outcome?“ Smith requested.
“I might take situation with the premise of the query that nothing was completed. Operation Midnight Hammer was very efficient,” Hegseth mentioned.
“What are we going to do now?” Smith requested.
Hegseth touted Trump’s file on Iran, together with withdrawing from the Iran nuclear deal, killing Qassem Soleimani, and ordering the assault on Iran’s nuclear amenities.
“It’s important to stare down this sort of enemy who’s hellbent on getting a nuclear weapon and get them to a degree the place they’re on the desk giving it up, in a means that ensures they’ll by no means have it,” Hegseth mentioned.

Protection Secretary Pete Hegseth, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Employees Basic Dan Caine and Underneath Secretary of Protection, Chief Monetary Officer Jules W. Hurst, testify earlier than a Home Armed Providers Committee listening to on Capitol Hill in Washington, April 29, 2026.
Kylie Cooper/Reuters
The testimony of Jules Hurst III, the Pentagon’s comptroller, was the primary public accounting from the Protection Division on the price of the battle up to now. A lot of that value is as a result of hundreds of bombs and missiles used, Hurst mentioned.
Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Employees mentioned in his opening assertion that he is dedicated to a non-partisan army.
“My blueprint for this position is Gen. George C. Marshall, his dedication to civilian management the army, and nonpartisan army stays a continuing normal, and one thing I borrow from usually, I attempt each day to emulate as candor, delivering the details to our leaders and telling them all the time what they should hear, not all the time what they wish to hear.”
The listening to got here simply two days earlier than a deadline set by the 1973 Battle Powers Decision that provides the president latitude for 60 days to conduct army strikes.
The decision offers the president latitude to conduct army strikes for a 60-day window, which closes Friday. The legislation permits for a one-time 30-day extension for the president to behave with out the consent of lawmakers.
Protection specialists have lengthy raised issues about stockpile constraints even earlier than the warfare with Iran, with some estimates of a possible battle with China suggesting the US may exhaust long-range missile inventories throughout the first few weeks of preventing.
In lower than two months of exchanging hearth with Iran, the U.S. has used roughly half of sure missiles and different munitions, in accordance with an analysis revealed final week by the Heart for Strategic and Worldwide Research (CSIS).
Retired Col. Mark Cancian, a senior adviser at CSIS and an creator of the report, mentioned Operation Epic Fury “does create a window of vulnerability” for a interval of as many as 4 years — the time it could take to replenish shares.
“The USA has sufficient munitions to battle this warfare if it stubs up once more,” Cancian mentioned. “However the threat is in a future warfare with China, the place stock ranges are far under the place warfare planners would really like them to be.”
Pentagon officers have maintained the U.S. has sufficient ammo to battle Iran. Although rearming the pressure with new munitions can take years, with some missiles requiring one to 2 years to construct, reflecting an inherent restrict on what number of complicated munitions the protection trade can produce every year, spurring a lot of the curiosity in enormous investments in comparatively low cost, easier-to-produce drones, which the Pentagon continues to surge into the Center East.
