Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Tech Life – Microsoft’s big quantum bet
    • Market Talk – June 2, 2026
    • Commentary: The biggest losers from Trump’s tariffs? Americans
    • Trump berated Netanyahu? Analysts question US-Israel feud rumours | US-Israel war on Iran News
    • Landry Shamet opens up about major concern ahead of NBA Finals
    • Contributor: How Democrats drifted away from the working class
    • Rep. Tom Kean hasn’t voted in months, yet Trump is backing him
    • World Service – Listen Live
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»Latest News»US judge blocks Justice Department bid to seize voter data in Rhode Island | Donald Trump News
    Latest News

    US judge blocks Justice Department bid to seize voter data in Rhode Island | Donald Trump News

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsApril 18, 2026No Comments3 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Ruling is newest loss for Trump administration, which has sought entry to state voter information forward of the US midterms.

    Printed On 17 Apr 202617 Apr 2026

    A federal decide in the USA has dismissed a Division of Justice lawsuit looking for to entry voter information from Rhode Island.

    The choice on Friday was the newest loss for the administration of President Donald Trump, which has sought to entry voter information in dozens of states throughout the nation.

    Beneficial Tales

    listing of three gadgetsfinish of listing

    Within the ruling, US District Courtroom Decide Mary McElroy sided with election officers and civil rights teams, writing that the Justice Division doesn’t have the authority “to conduct the sort of fishing expedition it seeks right here”.

    Rhode Island Secretary of State Gregg Amore praised the ruling in a press release afterwards.

    “The chief department appears to haven’t any drawback taking actions which can be clear Constitutional overreaches, recurrently meddling in obligations which can be the rights of the states,” Amore wrote.

    “However the energy of our democratic republic, constructed on three, coequal branches of presidency, is clearer than ever earlier than.”

    The Justice Division has sued at the least 30 states for his or her voter data, sustaining it wants the knowledge to safe election safety. State officers have mentioned that turning over the info raises an array of privateness issues.

    Beneath the US Structure, state officers administer elections. Solely Congress can go legal guidelines associated to how states oversee voting.

    However Trump has sought to rework election administration, claiming that voting has been marred by widespread fraud.

    Particularly, Trump has continued to take care of that the 2020 election, during which he misplaced to former President Joe Biden, was “stolen”.

    No proof has ever been put ahead to help the claims.

    Federal judges have rejected makes an attempt in California, Massachusetts, Michigan and Oregon to power the states handy over voter recordsdata to the federal authorities. No less than 12 states, nonetheless, have willingly offered or pledged to offer voter data to the Trump administration.

    The push for voter data is one among several actions which have raised issues over how the Trump administration will strategy the midterm elections in November, which can determine the make-up of the US Congress.

    He’s at present calling on Republicans to go the so-called SAVE America Act, a invoice that might create greater documentation requirements for voters to show their citizenship when registering to vote and casting ballots.

    The vast majority of Republican lawmakers have embraced Trump’s declare that the legislation is required to stop non-citizens from registering to vote, regardless of research displaying that cases of voter fraud are glancingly uncommon.

    Critics say the measure would threat disenfranchising hundreds of thousands of voters, notably those that have legally modified their names, which is a typical apply in US marriages.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleThe ‘Stanley Cup Playoff hat-tricks’ quiz
    Next Article Singapore, Australia have ‘substantially concluded’ negotiations on economic resilience, essential supplies agreement: Ministers
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Latest News

    Trump berated Netanyahu? Analysts question US-Israel feud rumours | US-Israel war on Iran News

    June 2, 2026
    Latest News

    Spain bans DR Congo World Cup warm-up due to Ebola fears | World Cup 2026 News

    June 2, 2026
    Latest News

    UN tells world to brace for extreme weather as El Nino looms | Climate News

    June 2, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    Chinese tech groups prepare for AI future without Nvidia

    May 30, 2025

    How to sell your Tesla and other options for electric cars: Elon Musk alienates drivers as sales fall

    February 27, 2025

    Jubilation as Thailand’s marriage equality law comes into effect | LGBTQ News

    January 23, 2025
    Our Picks

    Tech Life – Microsoft’s big quantum bet

    June 2, 2026

    Market Talk – June 2, 2026

    June 2, 2026

    Commentary: The biggest losers from Trump’s tariffs? Americans

    June 2, 2026
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.