Unlock the Editor’s Digest without spending a dime
Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favorite tales on this weekly e-newsletter.
Right here’s a narrative you might need heard earlier than: as soon as upon a time, a giant dangerous wave of Chinese language exports crashed on to the US financial system. Anybody complaining was dismissed as a protectionist crank, proof against progress, freedom and low cost furnishings. The victims suffered for years, struggling to search out new work. Ultimately they tried to take revenge by electing a chaotic wizard as their president: Donald Trump. The Finish.
Economists know this story all too effectively, although in addition they know that it’s removed from over. The Chinese language financial system by no means reformed sufficient to forestall its excesses smashing into its buying and selling companions, and not too long ago speak of a second “China Shock” has became extra of a screech. So far as I’m involved, no yarn is full and not using a nerdy dive into the information. So when assessing whether or not the sequel is as scary as the unique, how spooked ought to we be?
China alone, the primary shock appears rather more extreme. Over the primary seven years of the 2000s, its present account surplus as a share of its GDP exploded by roughly 8 share factors, whereas the amount of its items exports quadrupled. These beautiful surges dwarf newer modifications in each the present account surplus (a mere 3.5 share factors between 2018 and 2025) and items exports (a 50 per cent rise).
When you’re feeling soothed, cease. China’s financial system at this time is far bigger than it was again then, which implies that smaller imbalances have a lot stronger world results. As a share of worldwide GDP, the rise in China’s present account surplus over the previous seven years has been fairly much like the rise over the identical interval within the 2000s. And in absolute phrases, the will increase in export volumes throughout the 2 shocks aren’t very completely different.
Maybe a shock is scarier if it’s concentrated in a couple of merchandise, destroying, say, a automotive business. On this dimension the second China shock seems barely extra intense than the primary. Over the six years as much as 2007 the highest 10 fastest-growing merchandise accounted for 25 per cent of whole Chinese language manufacturing export progress, in contrast with 31 per cent over the identical interval as much as 2024, for instance. However that distinction isn’t big, and shrinks utilizing various measures.
The clearer distinction is within the nature of the merchandise China is sending. Whereas wealthy westerners have been comparatively relaxed about China sending over thousands and thousands of socks and sippy-cups, they’re feeling rather more threatened by competitors in higher-tech merchandise like vehicles and chips. China has turn out to be so large in so many areas that they’re additionally anxious concerning the nation weaponising its market dominance as they did for uncommon earths. (The protectionist cranks mutter “I instructed you so.”)
Peering by means of the information, there are a couple of different methods wherein the 2 shocks differ. One is the trail of China’s items export costs, which for all of the complaints about foreign money manipulation, rose by roughly 40 per cent between 2000 and 2007. Over the previous few years they’ve plunged, pushing Chinese leaders to acknowledge the issues related to competitors so cut-throat that nobody can flip a revenue. In 2025 they have been on the similar degree as they have been in 2018.
One other deviation from the primary China shock playbook lies in what China is shopping for — or moderately, what it’s not shopping for. Over the primary seven years of the 2000s, China’s import volumes rose comparatively healthily, because it sucked up the delicate tools it wanted to make its manufacturing exports increase. However extra not too long ago, its import volumes have been anaemic. Moderately than bemoaning the factories crushed by Chinese language competitors, maybe we needs to be pining for gross sales that by no means materialised.
Then there may be the distinction with America’s coverage method. Throughout the first China shock, the US Congress howled about foreign money manipulation, however in the end didn’t erect many new commerce obstacles. This time the Trump administration has one spell for every little thing: “Tariffa Kedavra!” So whereas throughout the first China shock, America’s share of China’s exports fell by round 2 share factors, over the previous seven years its share has fallen by 3 times as a lot.
For protagonists elsewhere on the planet, all this sounds alarmingly like a horror story — China’s export surge continues unabated, smashing into the remainder of the world. There’s additionally a twist: any efforts to reject Chinese language competitors might provoke retaliation, threatening entry to the Chinese language suppliers which are so central to trendy manufacturing provide chains. Which brings me to the ultimate distinction between the 2 China shocks: this time policymakers can be attempting more durable to keep away from an sad ending.
The Economics Show with Soumaya Keynes is a podcast from the FT bringing listeners a deeper understanding of essentially the most complicated world financial points in easy-to-digest weekly episodes. Hearken to new episodes each Friday on Apple, Spotify, Pocket Casts or wherever you get your podcasts
