NEWNow you can take heed to Fox Information articles!
As the controversy over birthright citizenship is debated within the Supreme Court, resurfaced movies of prime Democrats echoing the argument of the Trump administration sparked a conservative uproar on social media.
“If making it simple to be an unlawful alien isn’t sufficient, how about providing a reward for being an unlawful immigrant?” Former U.S. Senator Harry Reid stated on the Senate flooring in 1993.
“No sane nation would try this. Proper? Guess once more. When you break our legal guidelines by getting into this nation with out permission and provides beginning to a baby, we reward that youngster with U.S. citizenship and [a] assure of full entry to all public and social providers this society offers — and that’s lots of providers.”
Reid, who served within the Senate as a Democrat for 30 years and was Senate Majority Chief for 8 years, was talking in regards to the Immigration Stabilization Act of 1993 which he launched. The laws was a broad immigration reform package deal that included a provision to disclaim birthright citizenship to kids born within the U.S. to moms who had been neither U.S. residents nor lawful everlasting residents.
CHINESE ELITES EXPLOITING US BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP AT ‘INDUSTRIAL SCALE,’ EXPERT WARNS
US President Donald Trump takes a query from a reporter after signing an govt order within the Oval Workplace of the White Home in Washington, DC, on March 31, 2026. (Brendan SMIALOWSKI / AFP by way of Getty Photos)
Reid, who died in 2021 on the age of 82, finally modified his tune on the laws and said in 2018 that the invoice was a “mistake.”
Many on social media rapidly pointed to Reid’s lofty stature inside the Democratic Celebration and puzzled aloud why he’s not labeled “racist” the identical means Republicans who oppose birthright citizenship typically are.
“WOW,” conservative influencer Libs of TikTok posted on X. “Senator Harry Reid, a DEMOCRAT, launched a invoice in 1993 to END birthright citizenship for unlawful aliens .But when Trump needs to do it, Democrats name it ‘rAcIsT.’”
WHAT TO KNOW ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT’S BLOCKBUSTER BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP CASE
“A number of Democrats supported him,” actor Kevin Sorbo posted on X. “They alter their minds to suit no matter narrative fits them. That is why they cannot be trusted.”
“Democrats as soon as stated ‘no sane nation’ would give birthright citizenship to unlawful aliens,” Rep. Lance Gooden (R-Texas) posted on X. “Now, breaking our legal guidelines is rewarded with full US citizenship and entry to each authorities profit. SCOTUS ought to END this exploitation as soon as and for all!”
“Harry Reid was proper,” Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, posted on X.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Demonstrators holding opposing views verbally interact forward of President Donald Trump’s arrival on the U.S. Supreme Courtroom, Wednesday, April 1, 2026, in Washington. (Tom Brenner/AP)
One other Democrat, the late Sen. Dianne Feinstein from California, additionally grew to become fodder on social media in latest days over related feedback on immigration that had been considered over 8 million occasions after being posted by MAZE, a conservative influencer account on X.
“Ought to you’ve got a system the place folks can come to this nation, even when they’re well-to-do?” Feinstein stated in 1993. Get on Medicaid and provides beginning to a child, then return. The reply is not any! And we all know that Medicaid legal guidelines are getting used and abused to just do this within the state of California. I’d wish to see that cease.”
The resurfaced posts come because the Trump administration argues at the Supreme Court in favor of an govt order signed on the president’s first day again in workplace, which seeks to finish computerized citizenship for almost all individuals born within the U.S. to undocumented mother and father, or to oldsters with short-term non-immigrant visas within the U.S.
The high-stakes case introduced into focus greater than a century of govt department motion, Supreme Courtroom precedent, and the textual content of the Structure itself — or, extra particularly, the Citizenship Clause of the 14th Modification — which the administration argues has been misinterpreted within the greater than 100 years since its passage.
Fox Information Digital’s Breanne Deppisch contributed to this report.
