Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Tech Life – Would you wear smart glasses?
    • EPA To Repeal Greenhouse Gas Regulations
    • Federal authorities announce an end to the immigration crackdown in Minnesota
    • Italy stun Nepal for historic first T20 World Cup win | Cricket News
    • Team USA’s Madison Chock, Evan Bates settle for silver
    • The Winter Olympics should be the least of our climate change concerns
    • Nancy Guthrie live updates: Neighbors asked to look for video footage from Jan. 11, Jan. 31
    • Navigating AI Tools in Job Interviews
    Prime US News
    • Home
    • World News
    • Latest News
    • US News
    • Sports
    • Politics
    • Opinions
    • More
      • Tech News
      • Trending News
      • World Economy
    Prime US News
    Home»Opinions»Contributor: Don’t let natural gas exports wreck the Gulf of California ecosystem
    Opinions

    Contributor: Don’t let natural gas exports wreck the Gulf of California ecosystem

    Team_Prime US NewsBy Team_Prime US NewsFebruary 12, 2026No Comments5 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    As the consequences of local weather change intensify, it has turn into normal observe for main firms to pledge their help for environmental sustainability. That is accurately, as a result of real company engagement is important to the success of our collective response — and it makes good enterprise sense.

    Sempra, one in every of California’s largest public utilities, isn’t any exception, with commitments to “scale back current and future greenhouse fuel emissions” and “defend and protect biodiversity.” Sadly, these phrases are irreconcilable with Sempra’s plans to construct a harmful fossil gasoline challenge within the Gulf of California, also called the Sea of Cortez. This slim sea in Mexico is the location of wealthy biodiversity unsurpassed anyplace on Earth.

    A long time in the past, citing its distinctive range of marine life, legendary ocean explorer Jacques Cousteau nicknamed the gulf the “Aquarium of the World.” Confirming its international significance, UNESCO designated its islands and guarded areas a World Heritage Website. In the present day, extremely, this pure gem lies immediately within the bull’s-eye of U.S. fossil gasoline firms and their monetary allies as an industrial sacrifice zone for the manufacturing and transport to Asia of liquefied pure fuel.

    Final October, on the quadrennial assembly of the planet’s largest community of conservation consultants, convened by the 1,400-member Worldwide Union for the Conservation of Nature, the World Conservation Congress resoundingly permitted a resolution urging the U.S. and Mexico to ban LNG industrialization actions within the area to guard biodiversity, ecosystems and native Indigenous communities.

    Sempra apparently didn’t get the message. The truth is, it’s selling one in every of three main LNG terminals proposed on the japanese shore of the gulf. Known as Vista Pacifico LNG, Sempra’s challenge is anticipated to liquify 200 billion cubic toes per 12 months of pure fuel piped from the fuel fields of west Texas for export to Asia. Situated at Topolobampo, immediately throughout the water from Loreto and La Paz, the challenge would comprise a 5-million-ton-per-year floating liquefaction unit, a 180,000-cubic-meter tank, an LNG jetty, a fuel pipeline and different associated services.

    Nothing about this dystopian imaginative and prescient within the Aquarium of the World is appropriate with Sempra’s express environmental commitments. As emphasised by the latest World Conservation Congress, the gulf is a acknowledged sanctuary of world conservation worth. It has not solely been a World Heritage Website since 2005, however a Biosphere Reserve since 1993, a Migratory Hen Refuge since 1978, and, over a few years, the location of Ramsar Conference Wetlands of Worldwide Significance, together with the wetlands proposed for the Vista Pacifico challenge itself.

    The indeniable scientific bases for these designations are the long-lasting habitat and wealthy range of species themselves: 39% of all marine mammal species, eight species of nice whales (together with the endangered blue and fin), 891 species of fish (together with endangered whale sharks), 5 of eight species of sea turtles (together with the two,000-pound endangered leatherback), rebounding numbers of big manta ray, and thousands and thousands of marine birds.

    As a serious contributor to a wave of LNG export projects in the region, Vista Pacifico threatens not solely to industrialize this pure sanctuary but in addition to increase the worldwide local weather disaster. Cumulatively, these initiatives would allow vital portions of greenhouse fuel emissions (with a rise in air air pollution within the gulf area alone estimated to equal yearly emissions of 130,000 passenger autos) as fossil gasoline dependence continues for many years in Asia.

    Past the consequences of elevated air air pollution, water contamination and habitat degradation related to this industrialization, the results of utilizing the uniquely biodiverse gulf as a delivery channel for large LNG vessels are staggering. In line with a July research by the Autonomous College of Baja California Sur, the ships transiting the gulf, every the size of three soccer fields, would inevitably lead to ship strikes and an exponential improve in ambient ocean noise in key habitats of marine mammals whose survival (together with communication, feeding, discovering mates and reproducing) depends upon listening to and being heard. Unavoidably, endangered whales and different marine life would die as a direct results of LNG improvement, and the area’s sturdy fishing business and the communities it helps could be jeopardized.

    There could by no means be a clearer prescription for destruction of a pure World Heritage Website than this, and it should not stand. In 2026, the way forward for the Gulf of California presents a crossroad for the planet and a elementary alternative for Sempra. We urge the corporate to stick to its personal environmental requirements and cancel Vista Pacifico.

    Mary D. Nichols is counsel for the Emmett Institute at UCLA Legislation College and former chair of the California Air Sources Board. Joel R. Reynolds is senior legal professional and founding director of Marine Mammal Safety on the Pure Sources Protection Council.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleWhatsApp says Russia has tried to fully block the messaging app
    Next Article Defensive-minded No. 18 Saint Louis lugs win streak to Loyola Chicago
    Team_Prime US News
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Opinions

    The Winter Olympics should be the least of our climate change concerns

    February 12, 2026
    Opinions

    Contributor: Is there a duty to save wild animals from natural suffering?

    February 12, 2026
    Opinions

    Contributor: What’s behind these wild new wealth-tax proposals?

    February 5, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Most Popular

    Eagles’ Hurts shares advice for Browns’ Sanders after setback

    August 14, 2025

    Retail And Tech Jobs At-Risk In The US

    August 4, 2025

    Spatial Web: Transforming Device Interactions

    July 25, 2025
    Our Picks

    Tech Life – Would you wear smart glasses?

    February 12, 2026

    EPA To Repeal Greenhouse Gas Regulations

    February 12, 2026

    Federal authorities announce an end to the immigration crackdown in Minnesota

    February 12, 2026
    Categories
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • US News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Primeusnews.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.