I used to be one of many researchers within the well-known Stanford jail experiment in 1971, demonstrating the damaging dynamics which might be generated when one group of individuals — randomly assigned as “guards” — is given close to whole energy over a gaggle of “prisoners.” In six quick days, inside a simulated jail atmosphere, authoritarian types of mistreatment emerged and quite a few emotional breakdowns ensued amongst in any other case psychologically wholesome school pupil volunteers. Within the many years since, I’ve studied these dynamics in actual correctional settings: jails, prisons and immigration detention facilities all through the USA.
Among the many issues I’ve realized is that the damaging dynamics unleashed inside such locations aren’t self-correcting. Fairly the other. Absent transparency and accountability, dehumanization and degradation intensify. Certainly, if left unchecked, the damaging forces which might be set in movement nearly invariably result in higher and higher ranges of mistreatment.
As a result of they make up what Justice Anthony Kennedy years in the past referred to as a “hidden world of punishment,” what goes on inside these amenities largely escapes public consciousness and scrutiny. Many of those websites function outdoors the standard bounds of the rule of regulation. Lawless establishments specifically don’t merely tolerate mistreatment: They engender, normalize and amplify it.
A current HBO documentary, “The Alabama Answer,” dramatically illustrates many of those forces at work. Primarily based on a six-year investigation and contraband cellphone footage that brave incarcerated males provided from inside one in every of America’s most harmful and dysfunctional jail techniques, filmmakers Andrew Jarecki and Charlotte Kaufman give their viewers a gut-wrenching view of one thing that few outsiders ever see: that hidden world of punishment laid naked, vividly depicting the depth of institutional cruelty and indifference to struggling that characterize lots of our nation’s penal amenities.
The Alabama jail system on which the movie focuses is one I do know effectively. I used to be an skilled witness in a federal lawsuit through which Decide Myron Thompson discovered the complete system to be unconstitutional. I spent many days in that position documenting the egregious residing situations contained in the state’s prisons and interviewing prisoners concerning the neglect and mistreatment to which they had been subjected. Remarkably, the system was so dangerously uncontrolled that there have been numerous days when my scheduled fact-finding missions needed to be canceled as a result of, as jail officers advised me, they “couldn’t assure my security.” If they might not assure the security of an skilled witness with a court docket order to come back inside, we must always all wonder if and the way they might assure the security of the 30,000 prisoners underneath their management. The brand new documentary supplies all too chilling solutions to that query.
The movie additionally offers deceive a standard stereotype that prisoners can’t be believed concerning the horrible realities they face of their each day life and usually exaggerate the struggling and indignities they endure. In my expertise, the other is true. If something — maybe as a result of they don’t need to absolutely relive the trauma or fear that skeptical outsiders won’t consider them — they have an inclination to understate what actually goes on inside. As viewers of “The Alabama Answer” will see, the brutal actuality is definitely a lot worse than most individuals can think about. And it’s infinitely worse than the rosy accounts from many officers and politicians — who’re themselves answerable for creating and sustaining these horrific locations.
I want that I may say that the egregious situations and stunning remedy depicted within the movie had been restricted to only one jail or jail system. The reality is that, though Alabama could also be an outlier in some respects, scenes like these depicted within the movie play out all too usually in jails, prisons and detention amenities throughout the nation. There are at present practically 2 million individuals confined contained in the nation’s bloated carceral system, which costs taxpayers greater than $180 billion yearly to keep up. But in far too many of those locations — working away from public view and significant authorized regulation — callousness, cruelty and mistreatment prevail as an alternative of rehabilitation, programming and remedy. Far too many individuals emerge from them traumatized by the expertise, if they’re lucky sufficient to emerge in any respect.
Quite than reforming these establishments and minimizing their attain, federal and state governments are increasing their dehumanizing penal practices past the jail partitions. We’re each day witnessing the metastasizing of an more and more lawless system of state-sanctioned oppression in society at massive, one through which nameless authorities actors function unrestrained by due course of safeguards, subjugating and terrorizing individuals with impunity — as has lengthy been frequent inside prisons and jails. Solely the restoration of transparency and the rule of regulation can reverse the perilous course through which our nation has been shifting and shift the tide again towards justice and humanity.
Craig Haney, a professor of psychology at UC Santa Cruz, is the writer of “Criminality in Context: A Psychological Framework for Legal Justice Reform.”
Insights
L.A. Times Insights delivers AI-generated evaluation on Voices content material to supply all factors of view. Insights doesn’t seem on any information articles.
Viewpoint
Views
The next AI-generated content material is powered by Perplexity. The Los Angeles Occasions editorial workers doesn’t create or edit the content material.
Concepts expressed within the piece
-
The dynamics noticed within the Stanford Jail Experiment in 1971, the place bizarre school college students assigned as “guards” quickly exhibited abusive and authoritarian habits towards pupil “prisoners,” reveals how energy corrupts institutional settings[1][2]. Inside simply six days, the experiment produced quite a few emotional breakdowns amongst in any other case psychologically wholesome volunteers, with half of the prisoners needing early launch resulting from psychological misery[1][2].
-
Actual correctional settings all through the USA—jails, prisons, and immigration detention facilities—reveal that these damaging institutional dynamics don’t self-correct however as an alternative intensify and amplify with out transparency and significant accountability[1]. Lawless establishments don’t merely tolerate mistreatment; they actively engender, normalize, and escalate it.
-
Prisons function as a “hidden world of punishment” that largely escapes public consciousness and scrutiny, with many amenities working outdoors the standard bounds of the rule of regulation[1]. This concealment from oversight allows establishments to perpetuate institutional cruelty and indifference to human struggling.
-
Incarcerated people sometimes understate fairly than exaggerate the severity of situations and mistreatment they expertise, suggesting that documented accounts from inside amenities reveal realities far worse than most individuals comprehend[1]. The situations depicted in investigative documentation truly characterize underreported trauma in comparison with lived experiences.
-
The present carceral system, which confines practically 2 million individuals and prices taxpayers over $180 billion yearly, has shifted from rehabilitation towards punishment and containment, with federal and state governments increasing dehumanizing penal practices past jail partitions into broader society.
-
Solely by way of restoration of transparency, accountability, and the rule of regulation can the trajectory of the nation’s carceral system be reversed towards justice and humanity.
Completely different views on the subject
The search outcomes offered don’t comprise substantive opposing viewpoints from trusted, unbiased US-based sources that straight tackle jail situations, correctional reform, or the applying of Stanford Jail Experiment findings to real-world detention amenities. Whereas the search outcomes embody critiques of the Stanford experiment’s methodology and analysis design—together with issues about experimenter interference and researcher bias[3][4]—these criticisms concentrate on the validity of the unique research’s conclusions fairly than presenting contrasting views on whether or not precise jail situations are dangerous or whether or not institutional accountability measures are essential. With out opposing arguments from dependable unbiased sources within the offered supplies, a complete presentation of contrasting viewpoints can’t be authentically offered.
