Attorneys for former FBI Director James Comey and New York Legal professional Basic Letitia James have requested a decide to throw out their criminal indictments on the idea that the Trump-installed prosecutor who charged them was appointed unlawfully.
At a listening to Thursday, U.S. District Choose Cameron Currie pressed Justice Division attorneys on the federal government’s conduct in bringing indictments towards Comey and James, which had been introduced simply weeks aside on the direct urging of President Donald Trump after he eliminated a earlier appointee overseeing the highly effective U.S. Legal professional’s Workplace within the Japanese District of Virginia and changed him with Lindsey Halligan, a White Home aide and former insurance coverage lawyer with no prior prosecutorial expertise.
Attorneys for Comey, who has pleaded not responsible to allegedly making false statements to Congress, and James, who has pleaded not responsible to mortgage fraud-related charges, argued that the instances towards them are “fatally flawed” as a result of Halligan’s appointment violates the Structure’s Appointments Clause.
Choose Currie stated she would plan to rule earlier than Thanksgiving.
The authorized problem comes on the heels of different profitable efforts to disqualify prosecutors that the Trump administration had tried to put in in at the very least three different U.S. attorneys workplaces in Los Angeles, Nevada and New Jersey past the 120-day restrict set by federal regulation.
Choose Currie, an appointee of former President Invoice Clinton from South Carolina, was appointed final month to supervise the problem to Halligan’s appointment.
In authorized briefs, attorneys for each Comey and James pointed to the bizarre sequence of developments main as much as Halligan’s eventual appointment to steer the workplace after the ouster of Erik Siebert, who judges within the Japanese District of Virginia had unanimously voted to steer the workplace on an interim foundation after his 120-day appointment by Legal professional Basic Pam Bondi had expired.
On this March 6, 2025, file photograph, Lindsey Halligan, legal professional for Donald Trump, holds ceremonial proclamations to be signed by Donald Trump within the Oval Workplace of the White Home, in Washington, D.C.
Al Drago/Getty Pictures, FILE
Siebert, as ABC Information beforehand reported, had resisted bringing the instances towards each Comey and James after profession prosecutors within the workplace decided proof towards them would seemingly fail to convince a jury of their guilt.
However simply 4 days after Halligan was put in to steer the workplace, in keeping with sources, she dismissed suggestions of prosecutors and personally introduced the fees towards Comey earlier than a grand jury, which voted to indict him on two of three counts sought by Halligan. Simply two weeks later, Halligan once more personally appeared earlier than a grand jury to hunt James’ indictment.
“The President and Legal professional Basic appointed the President’s private lawyer as interim U.S. Legal professional in violation of a transparent statutory command in order that the interim U.S. Legal professional might indict an outspoken critic of the President simply days earlier than the related statute of limitations was set to run out,” Comey’s attorneys stated in a submitting final month.
The Justice Division has argued that the authorized problem to Halligan’s appointment relies on a misreading of statutes that govern presidential appointments and have accused Comey and James of in search of to take advantage of a “paperwork error” associated to the regulation cited by Bondi when she initially appointed Halligan to steer the workplace.
In a authorized transient earlier this month, prosecutors revealed that over a month after Halligan was appointed to steer the workplace, Bondi signed an extra order that sought to retroactively appoint Halligan as a “Particular Legal professional” particularly licensed to hunt the indictments of Comey and James.
“The Legal professional Basic has ratified Ms. Halligan’s appointment as Particular Legal professional with the authority to conduct prison litigation on this district,” prosecutors stated. “As a result of Ms. Halligan now has the indeniable authority to proceed with this prosecution, potential aid could be inappropriate.”
In a reply transient filed final week, Comey’s attorneys accused the federal government of in search of to “retroactively rework” Halligan into an “licensed authorities legal professional” and stated their efforts to bolster the validity of her appointment had been “unpersuasive.”
Critics say the indictments are a part of a campaign of retribution by Trump towards his perceived political foes, however Vice President JD Vance has stated any such prosecutions are “pushed by regulation and never by politics.”
Each James and Comey have urged Choose Currie to dismiss their indictments with prejudice, which might limit from the federal government from bringing costs towards them once more if Halligan’s appointment had been to be invalidated.
