Danish man given suspended sentence for sharing nude film scenes on Reddit

A Danish man has been convicted of sharing nude scenes from copyrighted movies and TV sequence on the social media website Reddit.

In response to a police doc seen by BBC Information, the person – who shouldn’t be named within the doc – shared 347 clips of nude scenes on the Reddit group he moderated, which had been then seen 4.2 million instances.

The Danish police say he has been given a seven month suspended sentence for copyright infringement.

Specialists say the person was prosecuted underneath a rarely-used clause in Danish copyright legislation, with the decide discovering that by taking the scenes out of their authentic context, the person had broken the artists’ “ethical rights”.

He has additionally been convicted of sharing greater than 25 terabytes of copyrighted knowledge.

From March 2022 to Could 2023, the person referred to as “KlammereFyr” on Reddit posted sexually specific scenes that includes over 100 actresses.

He shared them within the subreddit – or discussion board – he was a moderator of.

In response to the Danish anti-piracy group The Rights Alliance (TRA), his subreddit had greater than 6,000 members and customers had been inspired to request for clips of particular actors.

In 2023, campaigners reported the case to the police on behalf of the affected actors, administrators and producers, which led to the subreddit being closed down.

Andrea Vagn Jensen, one of many actresses whose specific scenes had been shared within the group, told the Danish broadcaster DR at the time she felt there was a distinction between showing bare in a movie and showing on Reddit.

The actress stated the posts amounted to “abuse”.

The person was arrested in September 2024 and pleaded responsible to the fees final month.

In a press release following the decision, TRA head Maria Fredenslund stated the ruling despatched an “essential” sign “that violations of artists’ rights has penalties”.

The ruling is taken into account distinctive in Denmark for its use of the “ethical rights” part of the Danish Copyright Act, which states an artist’s work can’t be utilized in a manner which infringes upon their popularity.

Copyright legislation professional Dr Alina Trapova advised the BBC the case was “uncommon” for its concentrate on the harm to the integrity of an artist, somewhat than to them economically.

How the case may have an effect on different international locations is unclear.

However she stated there could also be “an increasing number of of those actions” sooner or later with the expansion of synthetic intelligence, the place “the integrity of 1’s work is likely to be tempered with rather more simply”.